The aim of this study was to compare the short-term and mid-term outcome of lateral UKRs using a single prosthesis, the AMC Uniglide knee implant. Between 2003 and 2010, seventy lateral unicompartmental knee replacements (mean patient age 63.6±12.7 years) were performed at our unit for isolated lateral compartmental disease. Range of knee motion and functional outcome measures including the American Knee Society (AKSS), Oxford (OKS) and WOMAC scores were recorded from 19 knees at five years' post-operatively and compared to 35 knees at two-years and 53 knees at one-year post-op.Purpose
Methods
Kneeling ability is better in unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty. There is also an impression that mobile bearing knees achieve better functional outcome than their fixed bearing cousins in unicompartmental and to a lesser extent total joint arthroplasty. In the UK, the market leading unicompartmental replacement is mobile bearing. To analyse kneeling ability after total and unicompartmental knee replacement using mobile and fixed bearing inserts.Introduction
Aim
The aim of this study was to study the short-term outcome of a contemporary modular revision knee system used in our centre for managing Knee revision arthroplasty Preoperative, one and two years follow up scores and radiographic analysis were recorded from 72 consecutive knee revision cases performed between 2006 and 2008. Outcome measures included the American Knee Society (AKSS), Oxford (OKS) and WOMAC scores and range of motion. The radiographic assessment included review of standing AP, lateral and skyline views. Figgie's method was used to measure the joint line reproduction. A difference of 5 mm (pre=op/post-op) was deemed satisfactory.PURPOSE
METHODS
Assessing medium term outcome of medial Uni compartmental replacement and whether there is a difference in outcome between mobile and fixed bearing variants of the same prosthesis. Knee outcome was assessed in 150 patients (81 male, 69 females, mean age 67.0±10.4yrs) undergoing medial UKR knee (Uniglide, Corin Medical, UK) using either fixed or mobile bearing prosthesis between 2002-2007. All operations were performed by members of the Bristol knee group. All patients were scored using the American Knee Score (AKS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and WOMAC pre-operatively and at 2-year follow up. The mobile group (n=93) comprised 43 males and 50 females, aged 62.8±8.9yrs. The fixed bearing group (n=57) comprised 38 males and 19 females, aged 74±8.8yrs.Purpose of the study
Methods
To compare minimally invasive (MIS) and standard surgical total knee replacement technique through a prospective, randomised, single-centre, multi-surgeon, controlled trial. Between March 2007 and May 2009, 70 patients undergoing 73 total knee replacements were recruited. 31 operations were randomised to the MIS treatment arm, 42 to the standard control arm. Data were collected for mode of anaesthesia, American Society of Anaesthesiologists' score (ASA), surgical time, Postoperative blood loss within surgical drains, length of stay and complications. Patients underwent surgery via a mini-mid vastus approach or medial parapatella approach (controls). All operations were performedAim
Methods
