Aseptic loosening is the leading cause of revision of total hip arthroplasty (THA). It is well recognized that an occult infection is the underlying cause of some aseptic revisions. Intraoperative cultures are central to the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, the diagnostic and prognostic value of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures remains unclear. The aim was to study whether first-time aseptic revision of a total hip arthroplasty with unexpected bacterial growth in cultures of intraoperatively taken biopsies have an increased risk of secondary revision due to all causes and increased risk of PJI revision, specifically. Cases reported as first-time aseptic loosening revisions to the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (DHR) performed during January 1st, 2010, to May 15th, 2016, were included. DHR data were merged with the Danish Microbiology Database, which contains data from all intraoperatively obtained cultures in Denmark. Included first-time revisions were grouped based on the number of positive cultures growing the same bacteria genus: ≥2, 1 and 0 cultures. Revisions were followed until secondary revision, death, or end of follow-up period after one year. Relative risk for secondary revision due to all causes and PJI was estimated.Aim
Method
The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (DHR) is a national database on total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with a high completeness and validity of registration for primary procedures. The aim was to validate the registration in DHR for revisions due to Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI). We identified a cohort of patients in the DHR who underwent primary THA from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2012 and we followed these patients until first-time revision, death, emigration or December 31, 2012. The PJI diagnosis registered was tested against a gold standard encompassing information from microbiology, prescription, and clinical biochemistry registries in combination with clinical findings retrieved from medical records. We estimated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for PJI in DHR alone and in DHR combined with microbiology registries. Out of 37,828 primary THAs, 1,382 were registered with any revision, 232 of which were due to PJI. For PJI revisions in DHR, the sensitivity was 67.0% (CI: 61.0 – 72.6), specificity 95.2% (CI: 93.8 – 96.4), PPV 77.2% (CI: 71.2 – 82.4), and NPV 92.3% (CI 90.7 – 93.8). Combining DHR with microbiology registries led to a notable increased in the sensitivity for PJI revision to 90.3% (CI: 86.1 – 93.5) and likewise for specificity 99.6% (CI: 99.1 – 99.9), PPV 98.4% (CI: 95.9 – 99.6) and NPV 98.5% (CI: 97.6 – 99.1). Only two thirds of PJI revisions were captured in DHR and the PPV was moderate. However, combining DHR with microbiology registries improved the accuracy remarkably. The study was supported by Region of Southern Denmark and Lillebaelt Hospitals.
