Classical fixation using a circular frame involves two rings per segment and in many units this remains the norm whether using ilizarov or hexapod type frames. We present the results of two ring circular frame at King's College Hospital. A prospective database has been maintained of all frames applied since 2007. Radiographs from frames applied prior to July 2022 were examined. Clinic letters were then used to identify complications. Included: two ring hexapod for fracture, malunion, nonunion, arthrodesis or deformity correction in the lower limb. Excluded: patients under 16 years old, diabetic feet, Charcot joints, soft tissue contractures, arthrodiastasis, correction of the mid/forefoot, plate fixation augmentation, fixation off a third ring.Introduction
Materials & Methods
Patients undergoing complex limb reconstruction are often under immense physical, psychological and financial stress. We already provide psychological support within our unit. We have identified that patients struggle to obtain proper advice on the financial support to which they are entitled. In September 2019, In total 19 patients (68% male) have been seen. There have been 58 clinic appointments which have been a combination of face to face and virtual. The majority (80%) of issues dealt with relate to benefits – including claiming tax credits, universal credits and Personal Independence Payments. Other issues include housing problems, employment and claiming for travel and transport.Introduction
Materials and Methods
The locked plates are commonly used to obtain fixation in periarticular and comminuted fractures. Their use has also gained popularity in fixing fractures in osteoporotic skeleton. These plates provide stable fixation and promote biological healing. We have used over 150 locked plates with varying success in last 3 years to fix periarticular fractures involving mainly Knee and Ankle. These plates need to be removed if indicated which may be implant failure, infection, non-union or a palpable symptomatic implant. There are no reports in the literature regarding complications associated with removal of these locked plates. We report our clinical experience of removing locked plates in 28 adult patients. The procedure of implant removal was associated with a complication rate of 25%. The main problems encountered were difficulty in removing the locked screws and the implant itself. The locking plate could not be removed in two patients and had to be left in situ. We recommend that surgeon should be aware of these potential complications whilst removing these plates and that fluoroscopic control and all available extra equipment mainly metal cutting burrs and screw removal set should be available in theatre.
The medial collateral (MCL) length at full extension ranged from −9mm to 11mm and post-operatively was reduced to −16mm and 8mm, (p=0.042). At 90o flexion the length ranged from −3mm to 9mm and postoperatively was reduced to −8mm and 10mm (p=0.025). The lateral collateral (LCL) length at full extension changed from −10mm to 9mm pre-operatively to −13mm and 6mm post-operatively (p=0.011). At 90o flexion the range from −8mm and 9mm pre-operatively changed to − 5mm and 11mm post-operatively (p=0.005). All the above changes correspond to improvement in the post-operative axial alignment.
26 knees had normal tibial rotation pattern with the tibia rotating internally during knee flexion (mean rotation: 15.5°). In 22 knees (40%) the tibia was rotating internally and then externally as the flexion was progressing (mean rotation: 6.7°). In 7 joints (13%) a reverse tibial rotation was recorded, the tibia was rotating externally in all flexion increments (mean rotation: 2.2°). We also recorded that most of the tibial rotation occurs in the first 0–30° of flexion (70%) p<
0.001.
Proximal humeral fractures are common injuries but there is no general agreement on the best method for fixing unstable and displaced 3 &
4 part fractures. A new implant – Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (PHILOS) – has recently been introduced to fix these fractures. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the PHILOS plate in the surgical treatment of these fractures. We operated upon 36 patients between March 2002 and December 2004. 33 of them were available for follow up, which ranged from 12–45 months. Assessment at follow up included radiological review, Constant and DASH scoring. While recovery of movements and relief in pain was satisfactory, the strength of shoulder did not recover fully in any patient. There were two failures in our series, one due to breakage of plate. 4 patients have shown radiological signs of avascular necrosis of humeral head. The plate was removed in 4 patients due to impingement and / or mechanical block in abduction. Another 2 patients had to undergo arthroscopic subacromial decompression for the same reasons. We encountered the problem of cold welding and distortion of screw heads, while removing the PHILOS plate. The broken plate was subjected to biomechanical and metallurgical analysis, which revealed that the plate is inherently weak at the site of failure. The PHILOS plate does have inherent advantages over other implants for fixation of 3 and 4 part proximal humeral fractures but we are not convinced about its strength. Design of its proximal screws also appears less than satisfactory. The plate may cause impingement in some patients necessitating its removal later on, which itself may not be easy.
The movement of a normal knee is a complex of flex-ion-extension, translation and rotational movements. Intracapsular anatomical structures such as ACL, PCL, menisci, the bone anatomy as well as the muscles acting on the knee joint influence the screw home mechanism. We assessed the axial rotation of the tibia during knee flexion in order to better understand the kinematic behavior of osteoarthritic knees. We included 55 consecutive admissions (31 females and 24 males) with diagnosed osteoarthritis of the knee. All records were obtained by consultant orthopaedic surgeons using the trackers and software of a navigation knee replacement system, prior to a knee replacement surgery. All the records were obtained before any soft tissue release. For the statistical analysis we used the Wilcoxon non parametric two sample test. We found that the tibial rotation on knee flexion followed three distinct patterns: a) normal rotation: 26 knees (47%) with average rotation of 15.96° (range: 0.5°–34°). b) mixed internal and external rotation: 22 knees (40%) with average rotation 6.7° (range: 5°–0.5°) and c) reversed rotation: seven knees (13%) with average external rotation of 2.7° (range:1°–4°). Most of the tibial rotation occurs in the first 0–30° of flexion (70%) p<
0.001. Our study confirms that osteoarthritis affects the normal kinematics of the knee joint and also suggests that the observed kinematics follow distinctive patterns.
We studied the change in the axial rotation of the tibia at different levels of knee flexion after Knee Replacement using navigation systems. We reviewed the knee kinematic data of 36 consecutive patients (15 males and 21 females) who underwent elective knee replacement (Scorpio/Stryker) at King’s College Hospital. All data were generated using the navigation TKR trackers and software of a knee replacement system. All preoperative data obtained before any soft tissue release. We studied the tibial rotation at 30°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion. All operations were performed by consultant orthopaedic surgeons. We used the Wilcoxon non parametric two sample test for statistical analysis. The average tibial internal rotation upon knee flexion was 9.4° preoperatively and was reduced to 5.3° (mean 7.3°) post operatively. Most of the change (80%) occurred within the first 30° of flexion (p<
0.001). Postoperatively 38% of the studied knees had the screw home mechanism preserved. 52.7% had a mixed pattern of both internal and external rotation of the tibia and three knees (8%) had a reversed rotation of the tibia. The abnormal screw home pattern was preserved in 16 of the postoperative joints (46%). One knee was found postoperatively with external tibial rotation in all flexion increments. The abnormal pattern of tibial rotation was not improved following a navigation arthroplasty. We found that computer navigated TKR reduces significantly the tibial rotation and the replaced knee joint does not behave as a hinge joint. Pre-existing abnormal tibial rotation patterns were not improved postoperatively.