Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 357 - 357
1 Jul 2011
Chouliaras V Giotis D Roussi C Boulis S Grestas A Tatsis C
Full Access

Tunnel enlargement after AC reconstruction with a hamstring autograft has been noticed mainly the first 3–6 months postoperatively. Its etiology involves biomechanical and biological factors. The aggressive rehabilitation program is another etiological factor. The aim of this study is to investigate the tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction with a Hamstring autograft by the aid of CT-scan.

We investigate the tunnel diameter in a series of 25 consecutive patients who operated with a Hamstring autograft 3 months postoperatively. The mean age of the patients was 23.6 years old (18–35). The same femoral fixation system (XObutton) and the same tibial fixation system (bioabsorbable screw) were used in all the patients. All the follow the same rehabilitation program, partial weight bearing from the 1st postoperative day, brace for 3–5 weeks and return to sports activities in 6 months.

In 2 patients a meniscal suture was performed and in 3 patients a partial meniscectomy was performed. All patients had excellent clinical result which was demonstrated by the physical examination and by the KT-1000 results. Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS system. We noticed a tunnel enlargement in the majority of the patients, but this was not statistical significant (P< 0.01).

Tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring autograft has been noticed the first postoperative months, especially with the use of suspensor fixation systems. However in our study the tunnel enlargement is not correlated with a poor clinical outcome.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 346 - 346
1 Jul 2011
Nikolopoulos F Poulilios A Giotis D Tsapakidis I Tzoumakas K Grestas A
Full Access

Fractures of the distal tibia metaphysis comprise a challenge for the orthopaedic trauma surgeon because of the poor blood irrigation they do not heal very easy leading sometimes to pseudarthrosis and many times arise problems with the skin.

We compare the following techniques: LC-DCP and LCP plates, MIPO, External fixators (hybrids or simple one), intramedullary nailing with multiple screws at the distal end.

94 cases of distal tibia fractures from all AO types were treated during last 3 years (2005–2008) with the following techniques:

16 ORIF with LC-DCP plates

9 ORIF with LCP plates

19 MIPO

35 External fixators

15 intramedullary nailing

The simple oblique or spiral fractures which treated with the 1st and 2nd method (ORIF), they do not seem any remarkable difference in healing but both methods demonstrate a delay in fracture healing over 5 months. The 3rd method display faster healing 2,5 months average in simple fractures with no skin wound at all. The 4th method display 3 pin track infections and dealt with removal of the material and 2 pseudarthrosis which encountered with ORIF and bone grafting from the iliac. The 5th method display 2 malunions but because of the small angle in varus we do not perform any treatment. Every technique has its own position on those type of fractures, depending of the personality of the fracture and the skill of the surgeon.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 186 - 186
1 Feb 2004
Tsiampas D Papakostidis C Grestas A Stylos K Chrisovitsinos I
Full Access

Introduction: High tibial osteotomy is an established procedure for the mid-term treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee, especially in young patients. Nevertheless, its performance at the proximal end of the tibia, close to the site of insertion of the extensor mechanism of the knee, might produce anatomic alterations of the latter, which, in turn, could influence the final result.

Aim: The purpose of the present retrospective study is the radiologic evaluation of the anatomic changes of the extensor mechanism of the knee, caused by high tibial valgus osteotomy (closed-wedge step osteotomy, with internal fixation).

Material – Method: For this purpose we studied the X-rays of 44 kness (pre-op, p-op and 1 year p-op) that had undergone the above procedure. The assessed variables were the horizontal and vertical shift of tibial tubercle as well as the position of the patella (patellar vertical height, Linclau, Caton).

Results: We didn’t find any statistically significant difference of the postoperative position of the patella with respect to the preoperative one (p=0.88), whereas there was definite proximal and anterior shift of the tibial tubercle in a statistically significant degree (p< 0.01) with respect to the preoperative situation.

Conclusions: The certain type of high tibial osteotomy seems to impart an unloading effect on the patellofemoral joint (due to the anterior shift of the tibial tubercle). On the contrary, the vertical shift of the tibial tubercle seems to have no effect to the postoperative position of the patella.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 216 - 216
1 Mar 2003
Papakostidis C Grestas A Vardakas D Motsis E Tsiampas D Chrysovitsinos I
Full Access

Introduction: High tibial osteotomy is an established procedure for the mid-term treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. Nevertheless, it produces anatomic alterations of the proximal part of tibia, which might affect the later performance of TKR. These anatomic changes are basically patella infera and medialization of the tibial medullary canal with respect to the tibial plateau (tibial condilar offset).

Material and Method: The purpose of the present retrospective study is the evaluation of the above mentioned anatomic changes, caused by high tibial valgus osteotomy (Mittelmeier’s technique). For this purpose we studied the X-rays of 44 kness (pre-op, p-op and 1 year p-op) that had under gone the above procedure.

Results: We didn’t find any statistically significant difference of the postoperative position of the patella with respect to the preoperative one, whereas there was definite medialization of the tibial anatomic axis with respect to the preoperative situation. The latter change was directly correlated with the degree of valgus correction. The mean change of the tibial anatomic axis (as estimated by the value of the tibial condylar offset ratio) was 15%.

Conclusions: Although Mittelmeier’s high tibial valgus osteotomy does not cause any significant alteration of the position of the patella, it does alter the relationship of the tibial medullary canal with respect to the tibial plateau in direct correlation with the degree of valgus correction. Thus, the performance of TKR after proximal tibial osteotomy necessitates a thorough preoperative plan and the selection of the appropriate implant.