Surgical site infections following spinal surgery profoundly influence continued treatment, significantly impacting psychological and economic dimensions and clinical outcomes. Its reported incidence varies up to 20%, with the highest incidence amongst neuromuscular scoliosis and metastatic cord compression patients. We describe the first reported biphasic osteoconductive scaffold (Cerament G) with a logarithmic elution profile as a cumulative strategic treatment modality for adjacent spinal surgery infections. All patients who developed surgical site infections following instrumented fusion (May 2021-December 2021) had their demographics (age, sex), type and number of procedures, isolated organism, antibiotics given, comorbidities, and WHO performance status analysed. The infected wound was debrided to healthy planes, samples taken, and Cerament g applied. Thirteen patients were treated for deep SSI following spinal instrumentation and fusion procedures with intraoperative Cerament G application. There were four males and nine females with an average age of 40 ranging between 12 and 87. Nine patients underwent initial surgery for spinal deformity, and four were treated for fractures as index procedure. 77% of infections were attributable to MSSA and Cutibacteriousm acnes; others included Klebsiella, Pseudomonas and Streptococcus and targeted with multimodal cumulative therapy. A WHO performance score improved in 11 patients. In addition, there was no wound leak, and infection was eradicated successfully in 12/13 with a single procedure. This series shows the successful eradication of the infection and improved functional outcomes with Cerament G. However, the low numbers of patients in our series are an essential consideration for the broader applicability of this device.
The purpose of this study was to identify factors (radiographic and MRI) which may be important in determining whether a degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4/5 is mobile. We identified 60 consecutive patients with a degenerative spondylolisthesis(DS) at L4/5 and reviewed their imaging. Patients were separated into groups on the basis of whether the DS was mobile (group A) or non-mobile (Group B) when comparing the upright plain lumbar radiograph to the supine MRI. We assessed the lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, grade of the slip, facet angles at L4/5, facet tropism, facet effusion size, facet degenerative score (cartilage and sclerosis values) and disc degenerative score (Pfirrmann) at L4/5.Aim:
Method:
The Lenke Classification for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) classifies curves as nonstructural if they reduce to less than 25° on bending radiographs. We aimed to establish whether there is a significant difference in curves assessed as structural/ nonstructural when comparing bending radiographs to forced traction radiographs. We undertook a retrospective database review of 100 consecutive AIS patients having undergone surgical correction by the 2 senior authors, together with radiographic review. Curves were classified according to the Lenke system including modifiers. Magnitude of the minor curves were compared on plain PA standing radiographs, bending radiographs and forced traction radiographs.Aim:
Methods:
To compare the degree of deformity correction achieved using cobalt chromium versus titanium alloy rods in patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. A retrospective comparison of two cohorts of patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis treated with posterior segmental pedicle screw fixation using either Titanium or Cobalt Chromium rods. The radiographs of 50 patients treated before 2009 (Ti group) and 50 patients after 2009 (CoCr group) were reviewed for changes in: Main Coronal Curvature Sagittal Balance (C7 Plumb Line) Kyphosis (T5-12)Aim:
Method:
To compare the ability of fulcrum bend and traction radiographs to predict correction of AIS using pedicle screw only constructs and to compare the fulcrum bending correction index (FBCI) with a new measurement: the traction correction index (TCI). Retrospective radiographic analysis of eighty patients, average age 14 yrs, who underwent posterior correction of scoliosis using pedicle screw only construct. Analysis was carried out on the pre-op and immediate post-op PA radiographs and the pre-op fulcrum bend and traction radiographs. Correction rate, fulcrum flexibility, traction flexibility, FBCI and TCI was calculated.Aim:
Method:
To establish whether incidental durotomy complicating lumbar spine surgery adversely affects long-term outcome. Data was collected prospectively. The study population comprised 200 patients. 19 patients who sustained dural tears (Group A) were compared to a control group of 181 patients with no tear (Group B). Outcomes were measured with the SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scores for back (VB) and leg (VL) pain. Scores for the 2 groups were compared pre-operatively, at 2 and 6 months post-op for all patients and at long-term follow-up (range 2-9 years) for patients in group A. In addition for patients in group A the patients satisfaction with the procedure, ongoing symptoms, employment status and analgesic intake were documented.Purpose
Methods
To evaluate the level of health resource utilisation by patients after lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) for mechanical low back pain. At our centre, 35 patients underwent TDR and were followed prospectively from surgery. All surgery was performed by the senior author. Patients were followed routinely in clinic at yearly intervals. In addition, the patients and their GPs were contacted via telephone. Information gathered included ODI and VAS, satisfaction with surgery and return to work. We specifically established whether the patients continued to seek healthcare, for persistent back symptoms, from professionals (both NHS and private) including their GP, pain clinic, physiotherapist, acupuncturist, chiropractor or another spinal surgeon, and had any further interventions.Aim
Method
NICE guidance on lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) recommends ongoing audit should be an integral part of disc replacement surgery. We present our ongoing audit data and the extent of problem of patients lost to follow up. 35 patients underwent lumbar TDR surgery over 4.5 years. They were followed prospectively. A database is maintained and ODI and VAS were collected prospectively, including patient satisfaction and any failures.Aim
Method
In this study we aim to establish which symptoms and signs are able to reliably predict the presence or absence of cauda equina syndrome. Prospective collection of data was carried out over 10 months on all patients referred with suspected cauda equina syndrome(CES) to a single spinal unit. 28 patients were referred. MRI was normal in 4 (14%) patients. 4 (14%) had disc prolapse causing CES and 3 (11%) had spinal metastatic disease. All patients with CES presented with low back pain, unilateral sciatica, urinary dysfunction (painless retention 2, incontinence 2), altered perianal sensation and abnormal anal tone. 1 described constipation. Of patients without CES or malignancy 21 (100%) complained of low back pain, 19 (90%) sciatica (15 unilateral, 4 bilateral), 12 urinary dysfunction (incontinence 5, reduced sensation 3, painless retention 2, urgency 1, terminal dribbling 1) and 5 described altered bowel habit. 7 (33%) exhibited altered perianal sensation and 1 (5%) abnormal anal tone. The patients with spinal metastases all described back pain but no sciatica. 2 had urinary retention and constipation with 1 having abnormal perianal sensation and anal tone. This study suggests abnormal anal tone (sensitivity 1.0, specificity 0.95) and altered perianal sensation (sensitivity 1.0, specificity 0.67) are the most reliable predictors of CES. Thorough clinical examination is essential. Back pain with bladder and/or bowel dysfunction without sciatica should raise the suspicion of malignancy.
To establish whether incidental durotomy complicating lumbar spine surgery adversely affects long-term outcome. Data was collected prospectively. The study population comprised 200 patients. 19 patients who sustained dural tears (Group A) were compared to a control group of 181 patients with no tear (Group B). Outcomes were measured with the SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scores for back (VB) and leg (VL) pain. Scores for the 2 groups were compared pre-operatively, at 2 and 6 months post-op for all patients and at long-term follow-up (range 2-9 years) for patients in group A. In addition for patients in group A the patients satisfaction with the procedure, ongoing symptoms, employment status and analgesic intake were documented Pre-operative scores were similar between the 2 groups apart from significantly higher vb scores (63 –A vs 46-B). Results at 2 and 6 months showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Outcome scores for group A at long-term follow-up do not show any significant decline. Our study demonstrates that incidental dural tears complicating lumbar spine surgery do not adversely affect outcome in the long-term
