Surgical site infections following spinal surgery profoundly influence continued treatment, significantly impacting psychological and economic dimensions and clinical outcomes. Its reported incidence varies up to 20%, with the highest incidence amongst neuromuscular scoliosis and metastatic cord compression patients.

We describe the first reported biphasic osteoconductive scaffold (Cerament G) with a logarithmic elution profile as a cumulative strategic treatment modality for adjacent spinal surgery infections.

All patients who developed surgical site infections following instrumented fusion (May 2021-December 2021) had their demographics (age, sex), type and number of procedures, isolated organism, antibiotics given, comorbidities, and WHO performance status analysed.

The infected wound was debrided to healthy planes, samples taken, and Cerament g applied.

Thirteen patients were treated for deep SSI following spinal instrumentation and fusion procedures with intraoperative Cerament G application. There were four males and nine females with an average age of 40 ranging between 12 and 87. Nine patients underwent initial surgery for spinal deformity, and four were treated for fractures as index procedure.

77% of infections were attributable to MSSA and Cutibacteriousm acnes; others included Klebsiella, Pseudomonas and Streptococcus and targeted with multimodal cumulative therapy. A WHO performance score improved in 11 patients. In addition, there was no wound leak, and infection was eradicated successfully in 12/13 with a single procedure.

This series shows the successful eradication of the infection and improved functional outcomes with Cerament G. However, the low numbers of patients in our series are an essential consideration for the broader applicability of this device.

Aim:

The purpose of this study was to identify factors (radiographic and MRI) which may be important in determining whether a degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4/5 is mobile.

Aim:

The Lenke Classification for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) classifies curves as nonstructural if they reduce to less than 25° on bending radiographs. We aimed to establish whether there is a significant difference in curves assessed as structural/ nonstructural when comparing bending radiographs to forced traction radiographs.

Aim:

To compare the degree of deformity correction achieved using cobalt chromium versus titanium alloy rods in patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Aim:

To compare the ability of fulcrum bend and traction radiographs to predict correction of AIS using pedicle screw only constructs and to compare the fulcrum bending correction index (FBCI) with a new measurement: the traction correction index (TCI).

Purpose

To establish whether incidental durotomy complicating lumbar spine surgery adversely affects long-term outcome.

Aim

To evaluate the level of health resource utilisation by patients after lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) for mechanical low back pain.

Aim

NICE guidance on lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) recommends ongoing audit should be an integral part of disc replacement surgery. We present our ongoing audit data and the extent of problem of patients lost to follow up.

In this study we aim to establish which symptoms and signs are able to reliably predict the presence or absence of cauda equina syndrome.

Prospective collection of data was carried out over 10 months on all patients referred with suspected cauda equina syndrome(CES) to a single spinal unit. 28 patients were referred.

MRI was normal in 4 (14%) patients. 4 (14%) had disc prolapse causing CES and 3 (11%) had spinal metastatic disease. All patients with CES presented with low back pain, unilateral sciatica, urinary dysfunction (painless retention 2, incontinence 2), altered perianal sensation and abnormal anal tone. 1 described constipation. Of patients without CES or malignancy 21 (100%) complained of low back pain, 19 (90%) sciatica (15 unilateral, 4 bilateral), 12 urinary dysfunction (incontinence 5, reduced sensation 3, painless retention 2, urgency 1, terminal dribbling 1) and 5 described altered bowel habit. 7 (33%) exhibited altered perianal sensation and 1 (5%) abnormal anal tone.

The patients with spinal metastases all described back pain but no sciatica. 2 had urinary retention and constipation with 1 having abnormal perianal sensation and anal tone.

This study suggests abnormal anal tone (sensitivity 1.0, specificity 0.95) and altered perianal sensation (sensitivity 1.0, specificity 0.67) are the most reliable predictors of CES. Thorough clinical examination is essential. Back pain with bladder and/or bowel dysfunction without sciatica should raise the suspicion of malignancy.

To establish whether incidental durotomy complicating lumbar spine surgery adversely affects long-term outcome.

Data was collected prospectively. The study population comprised 200 patients. 19 patients who sustained dural tears (Group A) were compared to a control group of 181 patients with no tear (Group B). Outcomes were measured with the SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scores for back (VB) and leg (VL) pain. Scores for the 2 groups were compared pre-operatively, at 2 and 6 months post-op for all patients and at long-term follow-up (range 2-9 years) for patients in group A.

In addition for patients in group A the patients satisfaction with the procedure, ongoing symptoms, employment status and analgesic intake were documented

Pre-operative scores were similar between the 2 groups apart from significantly higher vb scores (63 –A vs 46-B). Results at 2 and 6 months showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Outcome scores for group A at long-term follow-up do not show any significant decline.

Our study demonstrates that incidental dural tears complicating lumbar spine surgery do not adversely affect outcome in the long-term

Introduction: Discectomy for herniation of the nucleus pulposus is an effective procedure when conservative treatment has failed. However, a number of patients rapidly progress to symptomatic instability after discectomy. Those most likely to develop instability have central and multi-regional herniations. Therefore, primary posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) may be a better option than discectomy alone in this group. This paper presents the clinical and radiological outcome of a consecutive group of such patients treated in one centre by PLIF, but recognises that newer technologies may make such destructive spinal surgery unnecessary in the future.

Methods: Between June 1997 and December 2000, PLIF for central disc herniation presenting with acute, subacute and chronic back and leg pain, with or without neurological loss, using Diapason pedicle screw instrumentation and Ogival PEEK (Polyether-ether-ketone) Interbody Fusion cages was performed on 41 patients. Eight patients presented acutely with cauda equina symptoms and 33 patients had sub-acute or chronic symptoms. Formal clinic follow-up was continued for at least two years post-surgery and the final outcome at 2 to 5 years after operation was assessed using the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS). Two independent orthopaedic surgeons assessed the radiological evidence of fusion on X-rays taken at least two years after surgery.

Results: 39 of the 41 patients completed the LBOS questionnaire (95%). One patient had died from an unrelated cause and the other could not be contacted having moved away. 34 (87%) of these had an excellent or good outcome according to the LBOS criteria. However, every patient who returned the questionnaire stated that they would undergo the operation again if guaranteed the same surgical result and all would recommend it to a friend for similar trouble. Four patients (9.7%) were dissatisfied with the process of care they experienced. Analysis of radiographs taken between two and four years post-operatively revealed that spinal fusion (as defined by the Brantigan and Steffee criteria) was present in 38 cases (92.7%). None of the patients with a non-union radiologically had a poor outcome.

Conclusions: Post-discectomy instability causing disabling low back and leg pain is more likely to occur in patients with an incompetent annulus than those with a largely intact annulus. The patients in this series all had good evidence on MRI of complete (pan-annular) failure. The decision to perform an acute single level PLIF was taken after discussion with the patients, presenting them with the option of having only a central discectomy and a later fusion if needed or of dealing with the problem at one operation. The outcomes described in this study show that this condition is a good indication for PLIF. However, newer technologies such as disc arthroplasty may be a better option for this group of patients in the future.

INTRODUCTION: Discectomy for herniation of the nucleus pulposus is an effective procedure when conservative treatment has failed. However, a number of patients rapidly progress to symptomatic instability after discectomy. Those most likely to develop instability have central and multi-regional herniations. Therefore, primary posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) may be a better option than discectomy alone in this group. This paper presents the clinical and radiological outcome of a consecutive group of such patients treated in one centre by PLIF, but recognises that newer technologies may make such destructive spinal surgery unnecessary in the future.

METHODS: Between June 1997 and December 2000, PLIF for central disc herniation presenting with acute, sub-acute and chronic back and leg pain, with or without neurological loss, using Diapason pedicle screw instrumentation and Ogival PEEK (Poly-ether-ether-ketone) Interbody Fusion cages was performed on 41 patients. Eight patients presented acutely with cauda equina symptoms and 33 patients had sub-acute or chronic symptoms. Formal clinic follow-up was continued for at least two years post-surgery and the final outcome at two to five years after operation was assessed using the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS). Two independent orthopaedic surgeons assessed the radiological evidence of fusion on X-rays taken at least two years after surgery.

RESULTS: 39 of the 41 patients completed the LBOS questionnaire (95%). One patient had died from an unrelated cause and the other could not be contacted having moved away. 34 (87%) of these had an excellent or good outcome according to the LBOS criteria. However, every patient who returned the questionnaire stated that they would undergo the operation again if guaranteed the same surgical result and all would recommend it to a friend for similar trouble. Four patients (9.7%) were dissatisfied with the process of care they experienced. Analysis of radiographs taken between two and four years post-operatively revealed that spinal fusion (as defined by the Brantigan and Steffee criteria) was present in 38 cases (92.7%). None of the patients with a non-union radiologically had a poor outcome.

CONCLUSIONS: Post-discectomy instability causing disabling low back and leg pain is more likely to occur in patients with an incompetent annulus than those with a largely intact annulus. The patients in this series all had good evidence on MRI of complete (pan-annular) failure. The decision to perform an acute single level PLIF was taken after discussion with the patients, presenting them with the option of having only a central discectomy and a later fusion if needed or of dealing with the problem at one operation. The outcomes described in this study show that this condition is a good indication for PLIF. However, newer technologies such as disc arthroplasty may be a better option for this group of patients in the future.