Objectives

Open fracture classification systems are limited in their use. Our objective was to classify open tibia and femur fractures using the OTS classification system in a region with high incidence of gunshot fractures.

One hundred and thirty-seven patients with diaphyseal tibia and femur open fractures were identified from a prospectively collected cohort of patients. This database contained all cases (closed and open fractures) of tibial and femoral intramedullary nailed patients older than 18 years old during the period of September 2017 to May 2021. Exclusion criteria included closed fractures, non-viable limbs, open fractures > 48 hours to first surgical debridement and patients unable to follow up over a period of 12 months (a total of 24). Open fractures captured and classified in the HOST study using the Gustilo-Anderson classification, were reviewed and reclassified using the OTS open fracture classification system, analysing gunshot fractures in particular.

Ninety percent were males with a mean age of 34. Most common mechanism was civilian gunshot wounds (gsw) in 54.7% of cases. In 52.6% of cases soft tissue management was healing via secondary intention, these not encompassed in the classification. Fracture classification was OTS Simple in 23.4%, Complex B in 24.1% and 52.6% of cases unclassified.

The OTS classification system was not comprehensive in the classification of open tibia and femur fractures in a setting of high incidence of gunshot fractures. An amendment has been proposed to alter acute management to appropriate wound care and to subcategorise Simple into A and B subdivisions; no soft tissue intervention and primary closure respectively. This will render the OTS classification system more inclusive to all open fractures of all causes with the potential to better guide patient care and clinical research.

Removal of bullets retained within joints is indicated to prevent mechanical blockade, 3rd body wear and resultant arthritis, plus lead arthropathy and systemic lead poisoning. The literature is sparse on this subject, with mostly sporadic case reports utilizing hip arthroscopy. We report on the largest series of removal of bullets from the hip joints using open surgical.

We reviewed prospectively collected data of patients who presented to a single institution with civilian gunshot injuries that breached the hip joint between 01 January 2009 and 31 December 2022.

We included all cases where the bullet was retained within the hip joint area. Exclusion criteria: cases where the hip joint was not breached, bullets were not retained around the hip area or cases with isolated acetabulum involvement.

One hundred and eighteen (118) patients were identified. One patient was excluded as the bullet embedded in the femur neck was sustained 10 years earlier. Of the remaining 117 patients, 70 had retained bullets around the hip joint. In 44 patients we undertook bullet removal using the followingsurgical hip dislocation (n = 18), hip arthrotomy (n = 18), removal at site of fracture fixation/replacement (n = 2), posterior wall osteotomy (n = 1), direct removal without capsulotomy (tractotomy) (n = 5).

In 26 patients we did not remove bullets for the following reasons: final location was extra-capsular embedded in the soft tissues (n=17), clinical decision to not remove (n=4), patients’ clinical condition did not allow for further surgery (n= 4) and patient refusal (n=1). No patients underwent hip arthroscopy.

With adequate pre-operative imaging and surgical planning, safe surgical removal of retained bullets in the hip joint can be achieved without the use of hip arthroscopy; using the traditional open surgical approaches of arthrotomy, tractotomy and surgical hip dislocation.

Introduction

External fixation (EF) devices are commonly used in the management of complex skeletal trauma, as well as in elective limb reconstruction surgery for the management of congenital and acquired pathology. The subsequent removal of an EF is commonly performed under a general anaesthetic in an operating theatre. This practice is resource intensive and limits the amount of operating theatre time available for other surgical cases. We aimed to assess the use of regional anaesthesia as an alternative method of analgesia to facilitate EF removal in an outpatient setting.

Abstract

Introduction

Methoxyflurane can cause hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity at anaesthetic doses but has excellent analgesic properties and no nephrotoxic effects in patients without preexisting disease. Approved for use in the UK and Ireland in 2015, it is currently being used in emergency departments for analgesia during fracture reduction. During the Covid emergency, with theatre access severely restricted and many patients unwilling to use inhaled Nitrous oxide, Penthrox had the potential to provide adequate pain relief to aid frame removals and minor procedures in the clinic.

The treatment for Humeral Supracondylar fractures in children is percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires using a unilateral or crossed wire configuration. Capitellar entry point with divergent wires is thought crucial in the lateral entry approach. Crossed wire configuration carries a risk of Ulnar nerve injury. Our department had recorded a number of failures and this required review.

A search was conducted for children with this injury and surgical fixation. A two year time frame was allocated to allow for adequate numbers. The hospitals radiography viewing system and patient notes were utilized to gather required information.

30 patients from 2–14 years all underwent surgery on the day of admission or the following day. 18 had sustained Gartland grade 3 or 4 injuries. Unilateral configuration was used in 10 cases; a loss of reduction was noted in 5 of these with one case requiring reoperation. Crossed wires were used in 20 cases with a loss of reduction in 1.

Crossed wire configuration provides a more reliable fixation with a lower chance or re-operation. Our DGH policy now advises the use of this configuration. A small “mini-open” ulnar approach is utilized with visualization and protection of the nerve.

Aims and Objectives

To assess the efficacy of linezolid in the treatment of orthopaedic related infection and the instance of adverse reactions.

Background: During cemented hip arthroplasty revision removal of all the old cement mantle is a time staking process with multiple disadvantages. In some selected patients cementing revision stem into the old mantle is regarded as a highly attractive option. Contradictory evidence exists whether bond between two cement layers is strong enough, especially in the presence of interfering fluids.

Aim: analysis of the shearing strength of the interface between two layers of polymethylmethacrylate cement in the presence of fluid.

Methods: Cylindrical blocks of polymethylmethacrylate cement represented primary cement mantle. Its flat surface was machined to reproduce smooth old cement mantle surface comparable with that after removal of a highly polished stem (Ra=200nm). A second block was cast against the first and their junction represented the investigated interface. The influence of fluid was examined by injecting liquid onto the ‘primary’ surface prior to casting. Water or 2% water solution of carboxy-methyllcellulose (representing bone marrow viscosity of 400mPas) were used in two volumes: 0.02ml/cm2 (small) or 0.4ml/cm2 (large - surface submerged).

6 variants (control monoblock, dry surface, surface stained with small or large volume of water or highly viscous fluid) containing 7 repeats were exposed to a single shearing stress to failure at the speed of 1mm/min (Autograph AGS, Shimadzu, Japan).

Results were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA with post-hoc analysis (equal N HSD) and power calculations.

Results: Large volume of viscous fluid prevented bonding completely in two cases and significantly weakened the other samples showing mean failure stress of 5.53 MPa (95%CI:1.33–9.73 MPa). This was significantly lower compared with control monoblock (19.8–95% CI: 17.8–21.9 MPa), dry surface variant (16.9–95% CI: 15.9–18.0 MPa) and that stained with small amount of high viscosity fluid (16.01–95% CI: 15.12–17.0 MPa). Interestingly, presence of a large volume of low viscosity fluid (water) did not significantly reduce resistance to shear stress (17.05 – 95% CI:15.67–18.43 MPa).

Similar relations were observed when strain at failure and toughness were analyzed.

Conclusions: In all but large volume of viscous fluid variants, the failure occurred away from the interface between two cement layers. Large amount of viscous fluid weakened significantly this interface. If such a viscous fluid can be eliminated by copious water irrigation it is likely that strength of the cement-cement bond will be maintained. In the presence of low viscosity fluids (water, blood) careful use of gun technique is likely to allow for their escape as the cement is advanced within the femoral or the old mantle canal leading to a satisfactory bond. Our observations suggest that cement-in-cement technique seems to be biomechanically acceptable.

Introduction: Ever since the coding has been introduced in the NHS there has been lot of debate whether the trust is being paid accurately. There is no data available which compares the coding done by the surgeon and the one done by the coding department.

Material and Methods: A prospective study was done on 305 patients in an elective orthopedic hospital over a period of one month. All operations were coded separately by the operating surgeon and the coding department. The procedures included all upper and lower limb procedures other than elective hand, spine and paediatric procedures. The results were compared by an independent assessor in line with the national guidelines and the information originally available to clinical coders.

Results: The results showed a marked difference in reimbursement cost of complex procedures, revisions and co-morbidities as coded by the surgeon who took into consideration additional top ups which were available and these were often missed by the coding department. There was no difference in the primary hip and knee arthroplasty.

Conclusion: There is an increased need for correct coding as this can result in potential income consequences by applied tariffs. With the introduction of acute phase tariffs and marked difference in reimbursement to the trust if correct codes are not applied, there is an increased need for awareness for the coding and the top-ups available for complex procedures.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of Bilateral Simultaneous Total Hip Arthroplasty (BSTHA) with that of staged (SgTHA) and unilateral (UTHA) was conducted using DerSimonian–Laird heterogeneity meta-analysis. Twenty three citations were eligible for inclusion. A total of 2063 BSTHA patients were identified. Meta-analysis of homogenous data revealed that there were no statistically significant differences between rates of thromboembolic events (p=0.268 and p=0.356) and dislocation (p=0.877) when comparing SgTHA or UTHA versus BSTHA procedures. Systematic analysis of heterogenous data demonstrated that mean length of stay was shorter in BSTHA as compared to SgTHA and UTHA procedure, blood loss was lower in BSTHA in all studies except one, whilst the surgical time was not different between groups. BSTHA was also found to be economically and functionally efficacious.

To evaluate a peri-operative protocol developed to facilitate day case open shoulder procedures that historically have required overnight hospital admission. 75 consecutive day-case open shoulder procedures were performed in 75 patients (aged 18 – 65) followed up prospectively for a minimum of 6 months. The procedures included Open Primary Anterior Capsulo-Labral Reconstruction (ACLR) (24), open Revision ACLR (4), open Posterior Capsulo-Labral Reconstruction (2), mini-arthrotomy and rotator cuff repair (6), mini-arthrotomy and sub-acromial decompression (28), modified Weaver Dunn Reconstruction of Acromio-clavicular joint (ACJ) (2), decompression of ACJ (7), open release for frozen shoulder (2). Exclusion criteria included concomitant medical problems, and patients who would have no assistance in their care for the first 24 post operative hours. All patients received general anaesthesia, peri-operative analgesia using intravenous Fentanyl, and Diclofenac (PR), and local Bupivicaine 0.5% to incisions and intra-articular spaces; patients were discharged with oral analgesics. Patient satisfaction with overall experience, pain control, the incidence of nausea that was difficult to manage, the incidence of unplanned admission, attendance or delayed admission to hospital and postoperative complications were measured. 98% of patients were satisfied with their pain management. None of the patients suffered intractable post operative pain, nausea or vomiting; none required unplanned hospital admission or unexpected re-admission. All the patients were satisfied with their overall experience. There were no short or long term post operative complications. In conclusion, the anaesthetic protocol and surgical techniques used in this study permitted same day discharge for a wide variety of open shoulder procedures. For selected patients, open shoulder surgery as a day case appears to be safe effective and acceptable to the patient.