Prosthetic joint infections provide complex management, due to often-difficult diagnosis, need for multiple surgeries and increased technical and financial requirements. “2 in 1” single stage approaches have been advocated due to reduction in risks, costs and complications. This study aimed to investigate the results of single stage revision using metaphyseal sleeves for infected primary Total Knee Replacement (TKR).

Prospective data was collected on all patients presenting with an infected primary TKR over an 8-year period (2009–17). All revision procedures were undertaken in a single stage using metaphyseal sleeves.

26 patients were included, 2 of which had previously failed 2 stage revision and 3 failed DAIR procedures. Mean age was 72.5. Mean BMI was 33.4. Median ASA 2. Mean time to revision was 3.5 years range 3 months to 12 years. Six patients had actively discharging sinuses at the time of surgery. Only 4 of the 26 patients had no positive microbiological cultures from deep tissue samples or joint aspirates.

Only one patient has a recurrence of infection. This patient did not require further surgery and is treated on long term antibiotic suppression and is systemically well.

There were statistically significant improvements in both the pain and function component of AKSS scores. There was no significant improvement in flexion, however mean extension and total range of movement both showed statistically significant improvements.

Using Metaphyseal sleeves in single stage revision for infected TKR are safe and lead to an improvement in pain, function and have excellent efficacy for eradication of infection.

The aim of this study was to identify psychosocial factors associated with pain intensity and disability following distal radius fracture (DRF).

We prospectively followed up 216 adult patients with DRF for 9 months. Demographics, injury and treatment details and psychological measures (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS), Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS), Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist – Civilian (PCL-C), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), Illness Perception Questionnaire Brief (IPQB), General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) and Recovery Locus of Control (RLOC)) were collected at enrolment. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors associated with DASH and Likert pain score.

Ten week DASH was associated with age (β-coefficient (β)= 0.3, p < 0.001), deprivation score (β=0.2, p = 0.014), nerve injury (β=0.1, p = 0.014), HADS depression (β=0.2, p = 0.008), IPQB (β=0.2, p = 0.001) and RLOC (β= −0.1, p = 0.031). Nine month DASH was associated with age (β=0.1, p = 0.04), deprivation score (β=0.4, p = 0.014), number of medical comorbidities (β=0.1, p = 0.034), radial shortening (β=0.1, p = 0.035), HADS depression (β=0.2, p = 0.015) and RLOC (β= −0.1, p = 0.027). Ten week pain score was associated with deprivation score (β=0.1, p = 0.049) and IPQB (β=0.3, p < 0.001). Pain score at 9 months was associated with number of medical comorbidities (β=0.1, p = 0.047).

Psychosocial factors are more strongly associated with pain and disability than injury or treatment characteristics after DRF. Identifying and treating these factors could enhance recovery.

An increasing number of distal humeral fractures are presenting as fragility fractures in low demand elderly patients. The optimal management of these injuries remains controversial. The primary aim of this study was to document the short and long term outcomes of these fractures treated with primary nonsurgical intervention. All patients were identified from a prospective trauma database from 1995 to 2010. All conservatively managed, isolated fractures of the distal humerus (OTA Type A,B,C) were included. Prospective long term follow up was collected by telephone interview. Demographic data, fracture classification, management protocol, subsequent surgeries, complications, range of motion, function and patient reported outcomes were recorded. The primary short-term outcome measure was the Broberg and Morrey Elbow Score. The primary long-term outcome measure was the DASH score.

Sixty-two patients were included. Mean age 76 (range, 11–96). Low-energy injuries were seen in 97% (59/61) of patients and ≥1 co-morbidities in 50% (27/54). At a mean of 3.7 months (range, 1–14) mean Broberg and Morrey score was 86 (range, 52–100); 70% (28/40) achieving excellent or good short-term outcome. Long-term follow-up was available in 17% (n=11) patients, with 75% (48/64) deceased. At a mean of 7 years (range, 4–17) mean DASH was 23.6 (range, 0.8–45.8), mean Oxford Elbow Score was 42 (range, 32–48). Overall patient satisfaction was 100% (n=11). One patient subsequently underwent open reduction internal fixation for malunion. We have reported satisfactory short-term and longer-term outcomes following the nonsurgical management of isolated distal humerus fractures in older lower demand patients.

The primary aim of this study was to identify risk factors for developing neuritis and its impact on outcome following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of distal humerus fractures.

Patients were identified from a prospective trauma database (1995–2010). All fractures of the distal humerus (OA-OTA Type A, B, C) managed with ORIF were included. Prospective long-term follow up was collected by telephone. Demographic data, fracture classification, intraoperative details (time to surgery, tourniquet, approach, fixation technique, nerve transposition), subsequent surgeries, presence of postoperative nerve palsy, complications and range of motion were collected. The Broberg and Morrey Elbow Score and DASH score were used as functional outcome measures.

Eighty-two patients, mean age 50(range, 13–93) were included. 16% (13/82) developed post-operative ulnar neuritis, 7% (6/82) radial neuritis and 5% (4/82) longterm nonspecific dysaesthesia. Short-term (mean 10 months, range 1–120, collected in 82 patients) and long-term (mean 6 years, range 4–18, collected in 45%, 34/75, of living patients) was completed. In patients with nerve complication: average Broberg and Morrey score was 86 (76% good/excellent), average DASH was 24.7(range, 3.3–100) and Oxford Elbow Score was 39.5(range, 18–48). Compared to: 94 (96% good/excellent), 17.7(range, 0–73.3) and 43.8(range, 17–48) in patients without. Mean pain score was 3.7 in patients with nerve complication compared to 2 without. Nerve complications were seen with increased frequency in young, male patients with high energy and Type C injuries.

Nerve complication following ORIF of distal humerus fractures is relatively common. They have detrimental impact on functional outcome. Certain groups appear to be at increased risk.

Vancouver B fractures around a cemented polished tapered stem (CTPS) are often treated with revision arthroplasty. Results of osteosynthesis in these fractures are poor as per current literature. However, the available literature does not distinguish between fractures around CTPS from those around other stems.

The aim of our study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcome of open reduction and internal fixation in Vancouver B fractures around CTPS using a broad non-locking plate.

Patients treated with osteosynthesis between January 1997 and July 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. All underwent direct reduction and stabilisation using cerclage wires before definitive fixation with a broad DCP. Bicortical screw fixation was obtained in the proximal and distal fragments. We defined failure of treatment as revision for any cause.

101 patients (42 men and 59 women, mean age 79) were included. 70 had minimum follow-up of 6 months. 63 of these went on to clinical and radiological union. Three developed infected non-union. 7 had failure of fixation. Lack of anatomical reduction was the commonest predictor of failure followed by inadequate proximal fragment fixation and infection. 14 patients dropped at least 1 mobility grade from their preoperative status.

This is the largest series of a very specific group of periprosthetic fractures treated with osteosynthesis. Patients who develop these fractures are often frail and “high risk” for major revision surgery. We recommend osteosynthesis for patients with Vancouver B periprosthetic fractures around CTPS provided these fractures can be anatomically reduced and adequately fixed.