Short cementless femoral stems are increasingly popular as they allow for less dissection for insertion. Use of such stems with the anterior approach (AA) may be associated with considerable per-operative fracture risk. This study's primary aim was to evaluate whether patient-specific femoral- and pelvic- morphology and surgical technique, influence per-operative fracture risk. In doing so, we aimed to describe important anatomical thresholds alerting surgeons. This is a single-centre, multi-surgeon retrospective, case-control matched study. Of 1145 primary THAs with a short, cementless stem inserted via the AA, 39 periprosthetic fractures (3.4%) were identified. These were matched for factors known to increase fracture risk (age, gender, BMI, side, Dorr classification, stem offset and indication for surgery) with 78 THAs that did not sustain a fracture. Radiographic analysis was performed using validated software to measure femoral- (canal flare index [CFI], morphological cortical index [MCI], calcar-calcar ratio [CCR]) and pelvic- (Ilium-ischial ratio [IIR], ilium overhang, and ASIS to greater trochanter distance) morphologies and surgical technique (% canal fill). Multivariate and Receiver-Operator Curve (ROC) analysis was performed to identify predictors of fracture. Femoral factors that differed included CFI (3.7±0.6 vs 2.9±0.4, p<0.001) and CCR (0.5±0.1 vs 0.4±0.1, p=0.006). The mean IIR was higher in fracture cases (3.3±0.6 vs 3.0±0.5, p<0.001). % Canal fill was reduced in fracture cases (82.8±7.6 vs 86.7±6.8, p=0.007). Multivariate analysis and ROC analyses revealed a threshold CFI of 3.17 was predictive of fracture (sensitivity:84.6% / specificity:75.6%). Fracture risk was 29 times higher when patients had CFI>3.17 and II ratio>3 (OR:29.2 95%CI: 9.5–89.9, p<0.001). Patient-specific anatomical parameters are important predictors of fracture-risk. When considering the use of short stems via the AA, careful radiographic analysis would help identify those at risk in order to consider alternative stem options.
For total hip arthroplasty (THA), cognitive training prior to performing real surgery may be an effective adjunct alongside simulation to shorten the learning curve. This study sought to create a cognitive training tool to perform direct anterior approach THA, validated by expert surgeons; and test its use as a training tool compared to conventional material. We employed a modified Delphi method with four expert surgeons from three international centres of excellence. Surgeons were independently observed performing THA before undergoing semi-structured cognitive task analysis (CTA) before completing successive rounds of electronic surveys until consensus. The agreed CTA was incorporated into a mobile and web-based platform. Forty surgical trainees (CT1-ST4) were randomised to CTA-training or a digital op-tech with surgical videos, before performing a simulated DAA THA in a validated fully-immersive virtual reality simulator.Background
Methods
Virtual Reality (VR) uses headsets and motion-tracked controllers so surgeons can perform simulated total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a fully-immersive, interactive 3D operating theatre. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of laboratory-based VR training on the ability of surgical trainees to perform direct anterior approach THA on cadavers. Eighteen surgical trainees (CT1-ST4) with no prior experience of direct anterior approach (DAA) THA completed an intensive 1-day course (lectures, dry-bone workshops and technique demonstrations). They were randomised to either a 5-week protocol of VR simulator training or conventional preparation (operation manuals and observation of real surgery). Trainees performed DAA-THA on cadaveric hips, assisted by a passive scrub nurse and surgical assistant. Performance was measured on the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Project (ISCP) procedure-based assessment (PBA), on a 9-point global summary score (Table 1). This was independently assessed by 2 hip surgeons blinded to group allocation. The secondary outcome measure was error in cup orientation from a predefined target (40° inclination and 20° anteversion).Background
Methods
This study aims to: determine the difference in pelvic position that occurs between surgery and radiographic, supine, postoperative assessment; examine how the difference in pelvic position influences subsequent component orientation; and establish whether differences in pelvic position, and thereafter component orientation, exist between total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed in the supine versus the lateral decubitus positions. The intra- and postoperative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of 321 THAs were included; 167 were performed with the patient supine using the anterior approach and 154 were performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus using the posterior approach. The inclination and anteversion of the acetabular component was measured and the difference (Δ) between the intra- and postoperative radiographs was determined. The target zone was inclination/anteversion of 40°/20° (± 10°). Changes in the tilt, rotation, and obliquity of the pelvis on the intra- and postoperative radiographs were calculated from Δinclination/anteversion using the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm.Aims
Patients and Methods
The resultant cup orientation depends upon the orientation of the pelvis at impaction. No studies to date have assessed whether patient-position during total hip arthroplasty (THA) has an effect on cup orientation. This study aims to 1) Determine the difference in pelvic position that occurs between surgery and radiographic, supine, post-operative assessment; 2) Examine how the difference in pelvic position influences subsequent cup orientation and 3) Establish whether pelvic orientation, and thereafter cup orientation, differences exist between THAs performed in the supine versus the lateral decubitus positions. This is a retrospective, multi-surgeon, single-centre, consecutive series. 321 THAs who had intra-operative, post-cup impaction, AP pelvic radiograph, in the operative position were included; 167 were performed with the patient supine (anterior approach), whilst 154 were performed in the lateral decubitus (posterior approach). Cup inclination/anteversion was measured from intra- and post-operative radiographs and the difference (Δ) was determined. Change in pelvic position (tilt, rotation, obliquity) between surgery and post-operatively was calculated from Δinclination/anteversion using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm.Introduction
Patients/Materials & Methods
The mechanisms of how spinal arthrodesis (SA) affects patient function after total hip replacement (THA) remain unclear. The objectives of this study were to a) Determine how outcome post-THA compares between patients with- and without-SA, b) Characterize sagittal pelvic changes that occur when moving between different functional positions, and test for differences between patients with- and without-SA, and c) Assess whether differences in sagittal pelvic dynamics are associated with outcome post-THA. Forty-two patients with THA-SA (60 hips) were case-control matched for age, gender, BMI with 42 THA-only patients (60 hips). All presented for review where outcome, PROMs [including Oxford-Hip-Score(OHS)] and 4 radiographs of the pelvis and spino-pelvic complex in 3 positions (supine, standing, deep-seated) were obtained. Cup orientation and various spino-pelvic parameters [including pelvic tilt (PT) and Pelvic-Femoral-Angle (PFA)] were measured. The difference in PT between standing and seated allowed for patient classification based on spino-pelvic mobility into normal (±10–30°), stiff (<±10°) or hypermobile (>±30°).Introduction
Patients/Materials & Methods
