Total shoulder arthroplasty results in excellent outcomes for most patients who suffer from osteoarthritis of the shoulder. Current trends within the field reflect a desire to minimise stem lengths in contemporary prosthetic designs. The movement towards short-stem humeral implants proffers several advantages including the ease of revision and ‘less invasive’ surgery. But, is there data to support these claims? This talk will focus on the proposed advantages of short-stem implants, variations in the current designs, the data on their outcomes and other current concepts with these implants.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has improved the lives of many patients with complex shoulder pathology including rotator cuff arthropathy, glenoid bone defects, post-traumatic arthritis and failed non-constrained total shoulder arthroplasty. However, this non-anatomic replacement has a very different complication profile than has been observed with non-constrained shoulder arthroplasty and the revision of RTSA can be extremely challenging. The purpose of this talk is to review some of the typical complications observed in RTSA including instability, infection, stress fractures, peri-prosthetic fractures and glenoid failures, and discuss the treatment options for dealing with these difficult problems.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) was designed to treat the cuff-deficient shoulder with arthritis and irreparable rotator cuff tears of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons. The results of RTSA in this patient population have been very good and reliable in the majority of cases. However, it has also been reported that patients whose rotator cuff tear involves the supraspinatus, infraspinatus and teres minor and who demonstrate a ‘horn-blower's sign’ do very poorly if a muscle transfer is not performed to improve external rotation in these shoulders in abduction. The loss of the teres minor in these patients results in grave difficulty for the patient attempting to perform their activities of daily living even if they can obtain reasonable good forward flexion. The muscle transfer that is most commonly used for these select patients is a latissmus dorsi tendon transfer in conjunction with RTSA. The purpose of this talk is to review the pathology of this problem and review the technique for its surgical treatment.

Rotator cuff arthropathy is a challenging problem to treat in many patients whose function remains intact despite pain from arthritis. In recent years, the introduction of reverse shoulder arthroplasty has improved the function and pain in pseudoparalytic shoulders with rotator cuff deficiency. However, significant evidence exists to support the use of alternative surgical and non-surgical treatments for those patients who suffer from the pain of arthritis while maintaining an intact force-couple of the rotator cuff and relatively well preserved function.

Large osteochondral defects of the glenohumeral joint are difficult to treat in young, active patients. When initial non-operative treatment with physical therapy, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, corticosteroid injections, and viscosupplementation fails, surgery may become an option for some patients.

Traditional shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty provide excellent function and pain relief that can be long-lasting, but these treatments are still very likely to fail during a young patient's lifetime, and results have been unsatisfactory in many younger patients. Microfracture and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) have been used in the shoulder, but their use has been limited to small defects. Other techniques that incorporate soft-tissue coverage of larger osteochondral defects have the benefit of preserving bone, but have not provided consistently good results.

Advanced surgical techniques have been developed including all-arthroscopic osteochondral graft resurfacing of the humerus and glenoid for the treatment of osteoarthritis. This method of ‘biological resurfacing’ of the joint without using prosthetic implants may offer potential benefits to these young patients with shoulder arthritis including faster rehabilitation, pain relief, and easier revision surgery, if necessary. Early outcomes are encouraging in many cases, but inconsistent overall, with pain relief being the most reliable indicator of patient satisfaction.

The infected shoulder arthroplasty is a devastating complication that can be very difficult to diagnose and treat. This presentation will compare the data on two-stage and single-stage exchange arthroplasty as pertains to functional outcomes and efficacy of eradication of the infection. Traditionally, the two-stage exchange arthroplasty has been the gold standard in the United States for the treatment of infected total shoulder replacements. In Europe, the trend seems to be moving towards a single-stage exchange with results that are reportedly comparable for eradication of infection to those of two-stage exchange although with seemingly better results for shoulder function. The surgeon's clinical experience with both techniques will be highlighted. A lively debate of the virtues and pitfalls of both approaches is the goal.

Is there an optimal way to place a glenoid in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA)? Four of the six parameters that a surgeon can control in a RTSA involve the glenoid. The parameters are: inferior tilt, increased lateral or inferior offset and increased glenosphere diameter. The theoretical challenges are further complicated by the normal variations that exist in the bony anatomy of the scapula and pathological abnormalities prevalent in as many as 40% of patients undergoing RTSA. Over the last 5 years there has been a growing body of data and study on the biomechanics, clinical outcomes and complications of this prosthesis. What have we learned? How does a surgeon incorporate this into their practice? The goal of this talk is to briefly review the current status of biomechanics on the impact of glenosphere positioning and offset on the outcome of reverse arthroplasty.

Aseptic loosening of the glenoid after total shoulder replacement is a challenging problem to manage clinically. In the right circumstances, arthroscopic retrieval of loose polyethylene glenoids can be a valuable tool in the shoulder surgeon's repertoire for dealing with this uncommon problem. The purpose of this talk is to demonstrate the technique for arthroscopic removal of a loose glenoid and review the clinical circumstances where this procedure may play a valuable role.

Introduction

The treatment of glenohumeral arthritis in a young patient poses a significant challenge. Factors that affect decision making include higher activity levels, greater expectations, and concerns of implant longevity. Conflicting results have been reported in the literature. The purpose of this study is to report on our results for resurfacing of the humeral head combined with a biologic glenoid resurfacing using a soft tissue allograft for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Common problems following total knee arthroplasty include tibial component malpositioning, ligament imbalance, and clinical and subclinical fat embolism associated with intramedullary alignment guides. Tibial component malaligment can lead to component loosening. Ligament imbalance can lead to dysfunction and the need for revision. Fat embolism had been shown to occur in 46% of unilateral and 65% of bilateral total knee arthroplasty patients with neurological sequelae in 2 and 4% of patients respectively (Kim YH, J. Arth. 1999). All three of these common problems can be addressed with the use of surgical navigation.

Instruments designed for the Genesis II total knee arthroplasty (Smith-Nephew, Memphis, TN) are tracked optically using the ION virtual fluoroscopy surgical navigation system (Medtronics SNT, Louisville, CO). A software system specifically designed for TKR navigation is employed. Following exposure, reference frames are attached to the femur and tibia and fluoroscopic images of the knee are obtained. Hip and Ankle centres can be determined either kinematically or with images. Proper alignment and component rotation is determined using navigation without intramedullary alignment guides. Proper implant sizing is determined before the cuts are made by superimposing images of the proposed implants into the fluoroscopic images of the knee. Motion and ligament integrity can be quantified kinematically. The system was used to perform total knee arthroplasty on 14 cadavers. Post-operative alignment was measured radiographically.

As compared to the mechanical axis measured radiographically, the coronal femoral alignment measured 0.03 degrees of valgus (95% confidence:−1.81 to 1.88 degrees). Coronal tibial aligment measured 0.88 degrees of valgus (95% confidence: −2.17 to 0.41 degrees). Sagittal tibial aligment measured 1.81 degrees of posterior slope (95% confidence: −0.14 to 3.76 degrees)

The use of surgical navigation for TKA results in appropriately aligned implants. Surgical navigation has the potential to improve many of the most common problems encountered during and following total knee arthroplasty including component malaligment and malsizing, malrotation, ligament imbalance, and fat embolism.