Established hip and knee arthroplasty registers exist in many countries but this is not the case with spinal implants. Moreover, in the case of a rod intended to guide spinal growth in a child and then be removed, the definition of ‘failure’ (revision) used for hip or knee arthroplasty is inappropriate. How can the performance of such spinal implants be judged? Ninety-six MAGnetic Expansion Control (MAGEC) spinal rods were obtained from multiple centres after removal from the spines of 52 children with scoliosis. Clinical details were assessed and divided between unplanned revision operations (‘failures’) and those which were planned. Of the explanted rods, 49 were tested for the amount of force they could output, using the manufacturer's supplied test jig. Sixty-five rods were cut apart so that the internal components (bearings, O-ring seals, drive pins) could be assessed, alongside if there was evidence of internal wear.Background
Methods
The MAGnetic Expansion Control (MAGEC) system
is used increasingly in the management of early-onset scoliosis.
Good results have been published, but there have been recent reports
identifying implant failures that may be associated with significant
metallosis surrounding the implants. This article aims to present
the current knowledge regarding the performance of this implant,
and the potential implications and strategies that may be employed
to identify and limit any problems. We urge surgeons to apply caution to patient and construct selection;
engage in prospective patient registration using a spine registry;
ensure close clinical monitoring until growth has ceased; and send
all explanted MAGEC rods for independent analysis. The MAGEC system may be a good instrumentation system for the
treatment of early-onset scoliosis. However, it is innovative and
like all new technology, especially when deployed in a paediatric
population, robust systems to assess long-term outcome are required
to ensure that patient safety is maintained. Cite this article:
To identify patterns in referral and the management pathway of patients with primary bone tumours of the spine referred to the Orthopaedic Spine Unit in order to recommend ways to improve the service. A retrospective notes and imaging review to evaluate the referral pathway undertaken by patients ending up in the orthopaedic spine unit over a 5 year period according to the recommendations for primary bone tumours. Significant events leading to potential improvement in outcomes were assessed. Recommendations for improvements are suggested. None of the 38 patients evaluated were referred within two weeks of presentation, and only 6 were referred directly to the bone tumour service. Almost half (15/32) of the patients who had an indirect referral pathway had a prior intervention. Five of these had non-surgical, while 10 had surgical interventions outside the tumour centre before their referral. Of these, seven had malignant tumours.Aim
Methods and Results
There were 29 patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and 7 patients with congenital or infantile scoliosis. Z-scores from patients with neuromuscular scoliosis also included, 10 patients with cerebral palsy and 11 with muscular dystrophies (mainly Duchenne MD). There were also 3 patients with Neurofbromatosis and 8 patients with other conditions (miscellaneous). Outcome measures were bone mineral density in patients with different types of scoliosis in form of Z-scores.
We studied MR images of the spine in a consecutive series of 100 patients with acute compression of the spinal cord due to metastases. All patients had documented neurological deficit and histologically proven carcinoma. MRI was used to localise bony metastatic involvement and soft-tissue impingement of the cord. A systematic method of documenting metastatic involvement is described. A total of 43 patients had compression at multiple levels; 160 vertebral levels were studied. In 120 vertebrae (75%), anterior, lateral and posterior bony elements were involved. Soft-tissue impingement of the spinal cord often involved more than one quadrant of its circumference. In 69 vertebrae (43%) there was concomitant anterior and posterior compression. Isolated involvement of a vertebral body was observed in only six vertebrae (3.8%). We have shown that in most cases of acute compression of the spinal cord due to metastases there is coexisting involvement of both anterior and posterior structures.