Various authors have linked hypermobility at the trapeziometacarpal joint to future development of arthritis. When examining hypermobility, the anterior oblique ligament (AOL) and ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) are the two most important supporting structures. Literature suggests that reconstructive techniques to correct the hypermobility can prevent subsequent development of osteoarthritis. Eaton and Littler proposed a surgical technique to reconstruct the ligamentous support of this joint in 1973. This cadaveric biomechanical study aimed to evaluate the resultant effect on the mobility of the thumb metacarpal following this reconstructive technique. Seventeen cadaveric hands were prepared and strategically placed on a jig. Movements at the trapeziometacarpal joint were created artificially. Static digital photographs were taken with intact AOL and UCL at trapeziometacarpal joint (controls), for later comparison with those after sectioning of these ligaments and following Eaton-Littler reconstructive technique. The photographic records were analyzed using Scion.Image. Statistical analysis was performed using Minitab. A paired T-test was used to establish statistical relevance. Results confirmed that the AOL and UCL had a major role in limiting excessive motion at the trapeziometacarpal joint, principally in extension. Division of these ligaments produced a significant degree of subluxation of the metacarpal at this joint with thumb in neutral position (p-value = 0.013). Reconstruction of the ligamentous support using the Eaton-Littler technique reduced the degree of extension available (p-value = 0.005). This study confirmed the important role of the AOL and UCL in maintaining trapeziometacarpal joint stability, and that the Eaton-Littler reconstructive technique reduces the degree of hyperextension at this joint.
We present a retrospective study of bilateral CDH. We analysed the correlation of complications to the confounding factors. We reviewed all bilateral CDH patients treated by the same surgeon at Southampton between 1988-2006. The patient recruitment was carried out as follows:
Group A – failed Pavlik harness; Group B – late presentations not treated in Pavlik harness.AIMS
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The study aimed to determine how well recorded pain levels and range of motion relate to patients' reported levels of functional ability/disability pre- and post- total hip arthroplasty. Range of motion (ROM), Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Self-Report Harris Hip Score (HHS) were recorded pre-operatively and 3 months post-total hip arthroplasty. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the strength of the relationships both pre- and post-operatively between ROM (calculated using the HHS scoring system) and scores on OHS and HHS and response relating to pain from the questionnaires (question 1 HHS and questions 1, 6, 8, 10, 11 and 12 of OHS) and overall scores. Only weak relationships were found between ROM and HHS pre- (r = 0.061, n = 99, p = 0.548) and post-operatively (r = 0.373, n = 66, p = 0.002). Similar results were found for OHS, and when ROM was substituted for flexion range. In contrast, strong correlations were found between OHS pain component and HHS pre- (r = -0.753, n = 107, p<0.001) and post-operatively (r = -0.836, n = 87, p<0.001). Strong correlations were also found between the OHS pain component correlated with the HHS functional component only (HHS with score for questions relating to pain deducted) pre- (r = -0.665, n = 107, p<0.001) and post-operatively (r = -0.688, n = 87, p<0.001). Similar results were found when the HHS pain component was correlated with OHS. In orthopaedic clinical practice ROM is routinely used to assess the success or failure of arthroplasty surgery. These results suggest that this should not be done. Instead, asking the patient the level of pain that they are experiencing may be a good determinant of level of function. The results of this study may aid the development of arthroplasty scoring systems which better assess patients' functional ability.