The Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement's (OUKR's) fully-congruent design minimises polyethylene wear. Consequently, wear is a rare failure mechanism. Phase-3 OUKR linear wear at 5 years was higher than previous OUKR phases, but very low compared to fixed-bearing UKRs. This study aimed to measure OUKR bearing wear at 10 years and investigate factors that may affect wear. Bearing thickness for 39 OUKRs from a randomised study was calculated using radiostereometric analysis at regular intervals up to 10 years. Data for 39 and 29 OUKRs was available at 5 and 10 years, respectively. As creep occurs early, wear rate was calculated using linear regression between 6 months and 10 years. Relationships between wear and patient factors, fixation method, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), bearing position, and component position were analysed.Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
The aim of this study was to compare the maximum
laxity conferred by the cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilised
(PS) Triathlon single-radius total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for anterior
drawer, varus–valgus opening and rotation in eight cadaver knees
through a defined arc of flexion (0º to 110º). The null hypothesis
was that the limits of laxity of CR- and PS-TKAs are not significantly
different. The investigation was undertaken in eight loaded cadaver knees
undergoing subjective stress testing using a measurement rig. Firstly
the native knee was tested prior to preparation for CR-TKA and subsequently
for PS-TKA implantation. Surgical navigation was used to track maximal
displacements/rotations at 0º, 30º, 60º, 90º and 110° of flexion.
Mixed-effects modelling was used to define the behaviour of the
TKAs. The laxity measured for the CR- and PS-TKAs revealed no statistically
significant differences over the studied flexion arc for the two
versions of TKA. Compared with the native knee both TKAs exhibited
slightly increased anterior drawer and decreased varus-valgus and
internal-external roational laxities. We believe further study is required
to define the clinical states for which the additional constraint
offered by a PS-TKA implant may be beneficial. Cite this article:
