Introduction: Musculoskeletal injuries of the shoulder in paraplegic patients can result from overuse and/or incorrect use of wheelchairs. With improved long-term survival of these patients who exclusively depend on their upper extremities for weight-bearing activities such as transfers and wheelchair propulsion, they are particularly susceptible for shoulder pathologies. The purpose of this study was to compare the functional and structural changes in weight-bearing shoulders of paraplegic patients who are wheelchair dependent for more than 30 years with able-bodied volunteers.

Methods: This was a randomized study with 80 (160 shoulders) patients who had been paraplegic and wheelchair dependent for a mean of 33 years. These patients were matched for gender, age, occupation, and hobbies to a group of 80 (160 shoulders) able-bodied volunteers. The mean age for the paraplegic patients was 54 years and 51 years for the matched volunteers. Shoulders from both groups were prospectively evaluated using MRI. All films were analyzed by two board-certified radiologists who were blinded to the study. Prospectively collected outcome measures included a standardized clinical examination protocol, the Constant score, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores.

Results: The shoulder function according to the Constant score was significantly worse in paraplegic patients compared to able-bodied volunteers (p< 0.001). Similarly, the VAS scores were significant greater in the paraplegic patients (three-fold higher pain intensity, p< 0.001). Comparison of the MRI films of the paraplegic patients and the volunteers revealed the following significant differences: rotator cuff tears 67% (108/160) vs 5.6% (9/160); tendonitis 50% (80/160) vs 23% (37/160); tendonitis of the long head of the biceps 25% (40/160) vs 3.7% (6/160); rupture of the long head of the biceps 10% (16/160) vs 2.5% (4/160); subacromial subdeltoid bursitis 71% (113/160) vs 34% (55/160); acromioclavicular osteoarthritis 33% (53/160) vs 15% (24/160); and glenohumeral osteoarthritis 15% (24/160) vs 8% (13/160).

Conclusion: This is the first study comparing the long-term effect on shoulder pathologies of paraplegic wheelchair users to a cohort of able-bodied volunteers. The complications of weight-bearing activities in these patients require appropriate prevention including wheelchair and/or home modification, physical therapy, pharmacological pain management, surgical intervention, and patient education.

Instrumented gait analysis has evolved into a widely used tool to define and describe abnormalities of gait. It is used as a tool to enhance the performance in sports as well as to measure the effects of conservative or surgical treatment methods. Patients usually walk very slow during gait training, whereas normal data are obtained at regular walking velocity. This may lead to misinterpretations. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of walking slow towards gait and to establish normal data for “walking slow” on a treadmill.

10 healthy volunteers with no known gait problem underwent training to accommodate to the conditions of treadmill walking. There were 5 females and 5 males. The mean age was 30 [range 22–56] years. Instrumented gait analysis was performed using a camera system (Motion Analysis Systems). Data obtained were processed by OrthotracTM and the proprietary software of our lab. During data acquisition participants were asked to walk at leisure velocity, then they were asked to slow down as much as possible.

The normal walking velocity of was 0,99 [range 0,78–1,16] m/s. When asked to walk as slow as possible the walking speed decreased to 0,29 [range 0,14–0,50] m/s. We noted a change in the ratio between swing and stance periods with less swing time, as well as a increase of double limb support time. Step length decreased. Changes in the pattern of motion included delayed and increased peak ankle dorsiflexion and decrease of ankle plantar flexion at initial contact. 3-D motion data for hip and knee also demonstrate noteworthy changes, generally resulting in a decrease of joint excursion.

Interpretation of gait data obtained from slow walking patients should consider the effects walking velocity. Locomotion therapy (e.g. for spinal cord injuries) should not force patients into motion patterns that are only found at faster walking velocities.