The purpose of this study was to measure the effect of the implementation of a LEAN continuous process improvement initiative on the waitlist in an ambulatory pediatric orthopaedic clinic.

LEAN is a set of principles that guide organizational thinking and form a comprehensive approach to continuous process improvement. In 2016, our health centre began its journey towards becoming a LEAN organization. The health centre's Strategy and Performance portfolio collaborated with the Orthopaedic Clinic Team to facilitate a Value Stream Analysis, which mapped the clinic process from referral to discharge from care. This informed the plan for targeted improvement events designed to identify and reduce non-value added activity, while partnering with patients and families to share their experiences with care in the clinic. Improvement events included: In-Clinic Patient Flow; Scheduling Process Review; Standardized Triage Process; Clinician Schedule; 5-S Large Cast and Sample Exam Rooms; Booking Orthopedics Clinic; and Travelling and Remote Care. During each event, solutions were identified to improve the patient experience, access, and clinic flow. These solutions have been standardized, documented, and continuously monitored to identify additional improvement opportunities. Comparison of wait-list and percentage of new patients seen within target window was performed from August 2017 to December 2018.

The LEAN initiative resulted in a 48% decrease in wait-list for new patients, which translated to an improvement from 39% to 70% of new patients seen within their target window. There was a 19% decrease in the 3400+ patient wait-list for follow-up appointments, an 85% reduction in follow-up patients waiting past their target date for an appointment, and the number of patients waiting over a year beyond their target appointment improved from over 300 patients to 0 patients. There was a 15% improvement in average length of clinic visit.

Without the addition of new resources, the implementation of a LEAN continuous process improvement initiative improved the waitlist for new patients in an ambulatory pediatric orthopaedic clinic by almost 50%. Solutions identified and implemented through the LEAN process have contributed to unprecedented improvements in access to care. In fulfilling one of the LEAN theory principles to “pursue perfection”, the paediatric orthopaedic clinic team has embraced a culture of continuous improvement and continues to use LEAN tools such as daily huddles and visual management to monitor solutions and identify gaps.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is traditionally treated with in situ fixation using a threaded screw, leading to physeal arrest while stabilizing the femoral head. Recently, there has been interest in alternative methods of fixation for SCFE, aiming to allow growth and remodelling of the femoral neck postoperatively. One such option is the Free Gliding SCFE Screw (Pega Medical), which employs a telescopic design intended to avoid physeal compression. The objective of this study is to evaluate radiographic changes of the proximal femur following in situ fixation using the Free Gliding SCFE Screw.

This study retrospectively evaluated 28 hips in 14 consecutive patients who underwent in situ hip fixation using the Free Gliding SCFE Screw between 2014 and 2018. Initial postoperative radiographs were compared to last available follow-up imaging. Radiographic assessment included screw length, articulotrochanteric distance (ATD), posterior sloping angle (PSA), alpha angle, head-neck offset (HNO) and head-shaft angle (HSA).

Of the 28 hips reviewed, 17 were treated for SCFE and an additional 11 treated prophylactically. Average age at surgery was 11.7 years, with an average follow-up of 1.44 years. Screw length increased by 2.3 mm (p < 0.001). ATD decreased from 25.4 to 22.2 mm (p < 0.001). Alpha angle decreased from 68.7 to 59.8 degrees (p = 0.004). There was a trend towards an increase in HNO (p = 0.07). There was no significant change in PSA or HAS. There were three complications (two patients with retained broken guide wires, and one patient requiring screw removal for hip pain).

With use of the Free Gliding SCFE Screw, there was evidence of screw expansion and femoral neck remodelling with short-term follow-up. More research is required to determine the long-term impact of these changes on hip function, and to aid in patient selection for this technology.

Objective evaluations of resident performance can be difficult to simulate. A novel competency based surgical OSCE was developed to evaluate surgical skill. The goal of this study was to test the construct validity comparing previously validated Ottawa scores (O-scores) and Orthopaedic in-training evaluation scores (OITE).

An OSCE designed to simulate typical general orthopaedic surgical cases was developed to evaluate resident surgical performance. Post-graduate year (PGY) 3–5 trainees have an encounter (interview and physical exam) with a standardized patient and perform a correlating surgery on a cadaver. Examiners evaluate all components of the treatment plan and provide an overall score on the OSCE and also provide an O-score on overall surgical performance. Convergent and divergent validity was assessed comparing OSCE scores to O-scores and OITE scores. SPSS was used for statistical analysis. ANOVA was used to compare PGY averages and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to compare OSCE versus O-score and OITE scores.

A total of 96 simulated surgical cases were evaluated over a 3 year period for 24 trainees. There was a significant difference in OSCE scores based on year of training. (PGY3 − 6.06/15, PGY4 − 8.16/15 and PGY5 − 11.14/15, p < 0 .001). OSCE and O-scores demonstrated a strong positive correlation of +0.89 while OSCE and OITE scores demonstrated a moderate positive correlation of 0.68.

OSCE scores demonstrated strong convergent and moderate divergent correlation. A positive trajectory based on level of training and stronger correlations with established, validated scores supports the construct validity of the novel surgical OSCE.

Objectives

To quantify and compare peri-acetabular bone mineral density (BMD) between a monoblock acetabular component using a metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing and a modular titanium shell with a polyethylene (PE) insert. The secondary outcome was to measure patient-reported clinical function.

Purpose

Use of a large femoral head metal-on-metal bearing in total hip arthroplasty may offer an advantage in terms of dislocation rates and more natural joint kinematics. The acetabular component is more rigid however in these prostheses and if not placed accurately can lead to increased levels of metal ion release. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to quantify bone mineral density on the acetabular side, as well as compare metal ion levels from a standard metal-on-polyethylene bearing to a large head metal-on-metal bearing in primary total hip arthroplasty.