Aims: The combination of microsurgical techniques with engineering of pseudo-nerves has recently seen an increased employment for the repair of peripheral nerve defects. Over the last ten years, we have investigated a particular type of bio-engineered nerve guide, the muscle-vein-combined tube, which is made by filling a vein with skeletal muscle. However, the basic mechanism underlying the effectiveness of this surgical technique are still unclear and yet an experimental study on its efficacy on functional recovery compared to traditional nerve autografts is still lacking in the literature. The aim of the present study was thus to fill this gap.

Methods: In rats, 10-mm-long median nerve defects were repaired using either traditional autografts or fresh muscle-vein-combined bioengineered scaffolds. Posttraumatic nerve recovery was assessed by grasping test. The samples were collected at different times after surgery: 5, 15, 30 days and 6 months. Analysis was carried out by light and electron microscopy. In addition, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to investigate the expression of mRNAs coding for glial markers as well as glial growth factor (NRG1) and its receptors (erbB2 and erbB3).

Results: Results showed that both types of nerve repair techniques led to successful axonal regeneration along the severed nerve trunk as well as to a partial recovery of the lost function as assessed by grasping test. Rats operated on by traditional nerve autografts performed better in the grasping test. Biomolecular analysis by RT-PCR demonstrated early overexpression during nerve regeneration of the gliotrophic factor NRG1 and two of its receptors: erbB2 and erbB3.

Conclusions: Our results confirmed that use of muscle-vein-combined tissue-engineered conduits is a good approach for bridging peripheral nerve defects in selected cases when traditional autografts are not employable and disclosed one of the basic biological mechanism that support the effectiveness of this surgical technique. Our experience also suggested that the rat forelimb experimental model is particularly appropriate for the study of microsurgical reconstruction of major mixed nerve trunks. Furthermore, since the forelimb model is less compromising for the animal, it should be preferred to the hindlimb model for many research purposes.