Methods:

Four surgeons performed the study on osteoarthritic and dysplastic Sawbone models using 3 different methods for placing the acetabular component (total n = 24). The 3 methods included (1) standard preoperative planning and instrumentation (i.e., standard method), (2) 3D computed tomographic (CT) scan planning and standard instrumentation (i.e., 3D planning method), and (3) 3D CT scan planning combined with an acetabular imprinting device (i.e., AID method). In the AID method, 3D planning software was used to virtually place the acetabular component at 40° of inclination and 22° of anteversion and create a parallel guide pin trajectory. A patient-specific surrogate bone model with a built-in guide pin trajectory was then manufactured as a stereoltihography device (Fig. 1A). The surgeon molded bone cement into the acetabulum imprinting the acetabular features while maintaining the guide pin trajectory (Fig. 1B). Afterward, the AID was removed from the surrogate bone model and placed onto the Sawbone, ensuring a secure fit (Fig. 1C). A guide pin was drilled into the Sawbone along the prescribed trajectory. With the guide pin in place, the surgeon could ream the acetabulum and impact the acetabular component using the guide pin as a visual aid (Fig. 1D). Postoperatively, a CT scan was used to define and compare the actual implant location with the preoperative plan. Statistical analysis was performed as 3 group comparisons using the chi-squared test for categorical data and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous measurements.