Introduction

Osteloysis following metal-on-UHMW polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is well reported, as is lack of osteolysis following Ceramic-on-Ceramic (CoC)THA. Early ceramic failures did report some osteolysis, but in flawed implants. As 3rd and now 4th generation ceramic THAs come into mid- and long-term use, the orthopaedic community has begun to see reports of high survival rates and very low incidence of osteolysis in these bearings. Osteolysis reported after 3rd generation CoC THA often included metallosis due to neck rim impingement. In our department we have revised only 2 hips in over 6000 CoC THAs for osteolysis. Both had evidence of metallosis as well as ceramic wear. The technique used by Radiologists for identifying the nature of lesions on CT is the Hounsfield score which will identify the density of the tissue within the lucent area. It is common for radiologist to have no access to previous imaging, especially pre-operative imaging if a long time has elapsed.

With such a low incidence of osteolysis in this patient group, what, then, should a surgeon do on receiving a CT report on a ceramic-on-ceramic THA which states there is osteolysis? Revision of such implants in elderly patients has a high risk of morbidity and mortality.