Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is recognised as an effective treatment for end-staged knee osteoarthritis. Up to 20% of these patients is unfortunately unsatisfied due to anterior knee pain from unknown origin (Bourne and al. 2010). The aim of this study is to compare knee 3D kinematics during gait of patients with anterior knee pain after TKA to an asymptomatic TKA group. Our hypothesis is that the painful TKA group would exhibit known kinematics characteristics during gait that increase patellofemoral (PF) stresses (i.e. dynamic flexion contracture, valgus alignment, valgus collapse or a quick internal tibial rotation movement) compared to the TKA asymptomatic group. Thirty-eight patients (45 knees) were recruited 12–24 months post-surgery done by one of three experienced orthopaedic surgeons (31 unilateral TKA and seven bilateral TKA, all using the same knee implant). Patients were divided according to their KOOS pain score (with a cut-off at 6/20 to be included in the painful group). The KOOS questionnaire was also used to assess activities of daily living, symptoms, sports and quality of life. A complete clinical and radiological work up was done on the painful group to exclude those with known explanation for pain (i.e. loosening, malrotation, infection and clinical instability). 3D knee kinematics during treadmill walking was captured and computed using the KneeKGTM system. For the painful and asymptomatic groups, demographic results show respectively: age of 64.4 ± 7.6 and 69.8 ± 8.3 years, BMI of 31.9 ± 5.0 and 28.1 ± 3.6 kg.m−2, speed of 1.8 ± 0.6 and 1.67 ± 0.5 miles/h., and 50% of women in each group. Only age and BMI showed to be statistically different between groups. The painful TKA group exhibited a valgus alignment when walking (at initial contact and during stance, p<0.001). No significant difference has been put forward for the flexion/extension and internal/external tibial rotation. Since a higher valgus alignment increases the Q angle, which lateralise the patella and increases PF stresses, results provide new insight on origin of symptoms. Conservative treatments for PF pain syndrome have shown to address the valgus alignment and improve symptoms, therefore the next step will be to assess the impact on pain level and alignment during gait of a personalised conservative management for the painful TKA group. Additionally, a study assessing the change in the radiological and dynamic alignment from pre to post surgery could bring valuable insight on the impact of surgical procedure on anterior knee pain.
The interval between injury and surgery was similar in both groups (<
12 days). Postoperative protocol and rehabilitation was the same in both groups. Full range of motion as tolerated was allowed two week after surgery. Active range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), pain, strength (Dexter isokinetic testing), patient satisfaction, operative time and elbow radiographs were evaluated at 12 months postoperatively. The mean follow-up was 17 months (range, 12–34).
We performed physical (including body mass index, BMI), functional and image examination (X-Rays and CT scan). In order to objectify the results we used SF-36, AOFAS scale (max 90 points) and Mazur scale (max 97 points). Kinetic parameters of motion with two force plates (Kistler, Switzerland) and pedography (Emed, Novel, Munich, Germany) were obtained. Kinematic data were obtained with a 3-D video analysis system (Clima system, STT, San Sebastian, Spain). A statistical descriptive study was performed to know the grade of patients’ satisfaction and to analyze the range of motion (ROM) and reaction force of the limbs. Both sides were compared.
Open arthrolysis (column procedure) trough a lateral (72%) or posterior (28%) approach followed a minimum rehabilitation period of 6 months post original injury. In 8 cases, an anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve was required. Patients received postoperative analgesia with Bupivacaine 0,0125% trough an indwelling catheter. No chemical or radiotherapy ectopic calcification prophylaxis was used. Postoperative complications, range of motion, X-ray evaluation, time to return to work, activity level and workers’ compensation were evaluated at the end of follow-up (24 months, range 12–36).
In 20% of cases, patients returned to their previous job with some restrictions (33% disability) and 12% changed to a less physically demanding occupation.
We considered factors such as: systemic conditions, functional work requirement, preoperative time, surgical technique, and their correlation with complications, clinical outcome and time to return to work and activity level.
Postoperative complications, pain (visual analogue scale), clinical and functional outcome based on DASH score, grip strength, X-ray evaluation, time to return to work and activity level were evaluated and compared at 3, 6 and 12 months of prospective follow-up.
Thirty-eight patients were treated with scaphoid excision and 4-corner fusion using dorsal circular plate. Thirty-nine patients were treated with total wrist fusion using one single, dorsal, precontoured and tapered plate for osteosynthesis and third carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ-3) was included. All patients were immobilised in a cast for 4 weeks after surgery. Postoperative complications, pain (visual analogue scale), clinical and functional outcome based on Green and O’Brien score, grip strength, X-ray evaluation, time to return to work and activity level were evaluated and compared.
The average time to return to work was 17 weeks (4-corner) and 16,2 weeks (total fusion). All patients return to work. Twelve percent of four-corner fusion and 72% of total wrist fusion return to the same work level with restrictions (until 33% of activity). Twenty-two percent of 4-corner fusion and 28% of total wrist fusion were unable to return to their previous activity level, performing lower intensity work activities. Overall satisfaction was high in both groups with 85% (4corner) and 93% (total fusion).
Total wrist fusion had less surgical failures, better level of satisfaction, lesser lost of force than 4-corner fusion, with less potential for further deterioration with time. However, 4-corner fusion allows return to work with a similar activity level and preserve a functional range of motion in patients with high levels of activity.
The patients were assessed clinically (modified Mayo wrist score) and radiograhically. The grip and pinch strength were also studied.