The aim of this study was to determine whether
obesity affects pain, surgical and functional outcomes following lumbar
spinal fusion for low back pain (LBP). A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was made of
those studies that compared the outcome of lumbar spinal fusion
for LBP in obese and non-obese patients. A total of 17 studies were
included in the meta-analysis. There was no difference in the pain
and functional outcomes. Lumbar spinal fusion in the obese patient resulted
in a statistically significantly greater intra-operative blood loss
(weighted mean difference: 54.04 ml; 95% confidence interval (CI)
15.08 to 93.00; n = 112; p = 0.007) more complications (odds ratio:
1.91; 95% CI 1.68 to 2.18; n = 43858; p <
0.001) and longer duration
of surgery (25.75 mins; 95% CI 15.61 to 35.90; n = 258; p <
0.001). Obese
patients have greater intra-operative blood loss, more complications
and longer duration of surgery but pain and functional outcome are
similar to non-obese patients. Based on these results, obesity is
not a contraindication to lumbar spinal fusion. Cite this article:
This study aims to evaluate the impact of associated psychological co-morbidities (Depression/Anxiety), smoking history, gender, work benefits and employment status on the clinical outcome following anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR). We included in our study 100 patients who underwent ACDR in our Spinal Unit (between May 2006 – May 2010). We used as clinical outcome measures: Visual Analogue Score for neck pain (VAS-NP) and arm pain (VAS-AP), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Bodily Pain (SF36-BP) component of the Short Form 36 questionnaire. Statistics were obtained using SPSS 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Independent sample t-test for normally distributed data and Man-Whitney U test for non-parametric data were used. Statistical significance was designated at p < 0.05.Introduction
Materials and Methods
We present the results of a single centre, prospective study to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior cervical decompression and replacement (ACDR) using the NuNec(tm) Cervical Arthroplasty System (Pioneer Surgical Technology, Marquette, Mich., USA). 36 patients with radiculopathy/myelopathy, who failed to respond to conservative measures, were included. Pain and function were evaluated by Visual Analogue score for Neck pain (VAS-NP) and Arm pain (VAS-AP), Neck disability index (NDI) and SF-36 questionnaires. Radiological assessments include assessing overall range of movement (ROM) and at functional segment unit (FSU). Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS 16.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Appropriate parametric (A paired t-test) and non parametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) were used to assess the statistical significance (p<0.05). The average age at operation was 51 years (range 35 - 77years). 8 patients received ACDR at one-level, 15 had 2-level surgery, 12 had 3-level surgery and 1 had a 4-level surgery. At the time of final follow-up (Mean 14.25 months, Range 12- 22.5 months) the mean NDI improved from 49.35; to 33.78 (p< 0.001). There statistically significant improvement note in VAS-NP (Post-op3.65, Pre-op:8.16, p<0.001), VAS-AP (Post-op:3.12, Pre-op:7.32, p<0.001) and SF-36BP (pre-op:29.15, post-op:37.18, p<0.002). The overall global ROM movement was preserved (pre-op:46.80±10.52, post-op:45.04±11.53) and an improvement in ROM at FSU was observed (pre-op:16.60±8.50, post-op:20.22±12.22) at final follow–up.Background
Methodology and Results
The purpose of this study is to compare the pre and post-operative magnetic resonance image clarity of titanium and PEEK based cervical arthroplasty devices at the level of implantation and adjacent level discs. This is a prospective, blinded, randomised study on imaging of cervical arthroplasty devices. The pre and postoperative MRI images of 16 patients who underwent cervical arthroplasty using Prestige LP(r) (Medtronic Sofamor Danek) and NuNec(tm) Cervical Arthroplasty System (Pioneer Surgical Technology, Marquette, Mich., USA) were assessed. Two independent radiologists who were blinded and provided with a sets of random images to score using a four point Jarvick grading system. Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS 16.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) and analysis included comparing MR image quality before and after cervical arthroplasty at the operated and adjacent levels, and in between two types of implant. The pre-operative MR image quality at operated and adjacent levels was excellent in both groups. In the post-operative images, the adjacent level visualisation was adequate in both groups without much difference in average scores. However, at operated level, the quality of MR images in the NuNec group (PEEK on PEEK articulating disc) was excellent and clear visualisation of the cord, central canal, foramen and disc.Aim
Methodology and Results
To assess the clinical and radiological outcome of single and multiple level Anterior Cervical Disc Replacement (ACDR) using Peek-on-peek system. We present the largest series of POPCDR at a single centre. Thirty-one patients with radiculopathy and/or myelopathy caused by disc generation who did not respond to conservative treatments were included. Pain and function were evaluated by VAS (Visual Analogue Score) for neck (VAS-NP) and arm pain (VAS-AP). Neck disability index (NDI) and SF-36 questionnaires were completed. Disc height and segmental angular correction (SAC) were measured on radiographs pre- and postoperatively. Seven patients had one-level, fifteen had two-level, seven had three-level and two had four-level ACDR. Sixty-six discs were replaced. Average follow-up was six months. Mean VAS-NP improved from 7.27 to 3.93 and VAS-AP from 7.27 to 3.4. Mean SF-36 improved from 32.21 to 40.22. There was functional improvement for NDI in all patients. There was an improvement in SAC from 5.4° to 8.0° for one-level, 3.1° to 7.5° for two level, 8.4° to 9.4° for three-level and 5.8° to 26.7° for four-level ACDR. Post-operative anterior disc height increased by 152% for lower and 55% for higher levels. Similar improvements were noted for posterior disc heights. Early results show that POPCDR is safe and effective for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. The clinical and radiological outcomes are similar to other types of ACDR reported in literature. POPCDR also allows safe use of MRI during follow-up with fewer artifacts giving it an edge over other systems.
