header advert
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 178 - 178
1 Mar 2006
Karnezis L George I Drosos Emmanouel G Fragkiadakis
Full Access

Aims: To investigate the correlation between radiological parameters of distal radial fractures and the clinical outcome expressed by objective clinical parameters and the level of patient-rated wrist dysfunction.

Methods: A Prospective study of 30 consecutive patients with unstable fractures of the distal radius treated with closed reduction and percutaneous wire fixation followed by six-week cast immobilisation and fully assessed for a period of one year. The outcome parameters included the fracture type, radial shortening, palmar angle, radial angle, presence of postoperative intra-articular ‘step-off’, range of wrist movement, grip strength, function and pain Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores[1].

Results: There was statistically significant differences in the range of final wrist palmarflexion according to the AO fracture type (p=0.04, Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric analysis) and final wrist dorsiflexion and PRWE function score (p< 0.01 and p=0.02 respectively, Mann-Whitney test) according to the presence or not of postoperative articular ‘step-off’. Permanent radial shortening and loss of palmar angle correlated inversely with the PRWE pain score (p< 0.01 and p=0.03 respectively with statistical correlation).

Conclusions: Permanent radial shortening and loss of palmar angle are associated with prolonged wrist pain. Residual articular incongruity correlates with persisting loss of wrist dorsiflexion and wrist dysfunction a finding that contradicts the notion that loss of articular congruity is associated with late development of articular degeneration but not with early wrist dysfunction. The study failed to show any association between the fracture type and the functional outcome as rated by the patients.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 14 - 14
1 Jan 2003
Karnezis I Fragkiadakis E
Full Access

It is generally appreciated that the internal structure and external shape of living bone adapt to mechanical stimuli according to Wolff’s law. However, the precise details of bone adaptation to external forces are not fully understood and there has been no previous investigation of the association between specific loading conditions and the skeletal architecture of a particular anatomical area using case-specific observations in a group of individuals. The aim of the present study was to investigate a previously unreported correlation between the maximum wrist joint reaction force and the volar tilt angle of the distal radius using parameters radiographically obtained parameters from normal wrist joints.

Using free body analysis of the forces acting on the distal radius for the loading condition that corresponds to the lift of a weight using the supinated hand, the wrist joint reaction force F and the angle formed between the vector of F and the long axis of the radius have been expressed as a function of the lifted weight, the lever-arm of the wrist flexor tendons and that of the lifted weight. Measurements of the volar tilt angle of distal radius and the lever-arms of the flexor tendons and the lifted weight were performed from lateral wrist radiographs of 30 normal wrists. Subsequently, using the equations obtained from free body analysis, the maximum wrist joint reaction force F and the angle that the latter forms with the long axis of the radius were calculated for each the cases. Statistical analysis compared the angle of the maximum wrist force and the volar tilt of the distal radius (two-tailed paired t-test) and correlated (a) the angle of the maximum wrist force and the volar tilt angle and (b) the maximum joint reaction force and the volar tilt angle.

Results showed no significant difference (p=0.33, 95% confidence interval −0.64° to 0.22°) but a statistically significant correlation (R2 = 0.74, r = 0.86, p < 0.001) between the angle of the maximum wrist force and the volar tilt angle of the distal radius. Additionally, an inverse relationship between the volar tilt angle and the magnitude of the maximum wrist force (R2 = 0.71, r =−0.84, p< 0.001) was found.

These observations may explain the mechanism of the phylogenetical development of the volar tilt angle and support the ‘minimum effective strain’ theory of adaptive bone remodeling1. The importance of accurate restoration of the volar tilt during treatment of distal radius fractures, especially in wrists that are normally characterised by a low volar tilt angle, is also emphasized by the results of the present study.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 7 - 7
1 Jan 2003
Karnezis I Fragkiadakis E
Full Access

Patient disability and handicap following wrist injuries have been the focus of recent research interest1. However, the relative importance of each of the commonly-reported and easily-measured clinical outcome parameters such as the range of wrist movement and the grip strength on the level of actual wrist disability following distal radial fractures has not been investigated previously. The present study investigates the correlation between measurements of specific clinical parameters and the patient-rated wrist joint function following wrist fractures.

A prospective assessment of unstable (AO types 23-A2, -A3, -C1 and -C2) fractures of the distal radius treated by closed reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation followed by cast immobilisation was undertaken. One hundred consecutive observations were made during various follow-up time periods up to one year in a group of twenty-five patients (fifteen female and ten male patients, mean age 43 years – range 18 to 67 years). The clinical parameters tested were the range of wrist dorsiflexion, palmarflexion, pronation and supination (measured using a goniometer) and the mass grip strength (Jamar grip dynamometer) following removal of the plaster cast, expressed as percentage of the affected side relative to the opposite normal side. Additionally, each patient completed the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) Score1. A stepwise multiple regression multivariate model was employed to statistically analyse the relative effect (expressed as the regression coefficient, b) of each clinical parameter on the ‘Function Score’ part of the PRWE Score. Furthermore, the association between each clinical parameter and the Function Score part of the PRWE Score was also investigated using single-patient observations by calculating the correlation coefficient (r).

The results of the statistical analysis (Minitab 12.1) gave the following regression (b) and correlation (r) coefficient values: grip strength (b=0.77, r=0.80), dorsiflexion (b=0.58,r=0.78),pronation (b=0.39,r=0.70),supination (b=0.38, r=0.63), palmarflexion (b=0.32, r=0.62).

The present study shows that grip strength (expressed as percentage that of the unaffected side) is the most reliable index of wrist disability and the most sensitive indicator of return of wrist function, followed by the range of wrist dorsiflexion and pronation. Wrist supination and palmarflexion are the clinical outcome variables showing the weakest correlation with the wrist function as rated by the patients. These observations may facilitate correct interpretation and comparisons of the results of clinical studies on various methods of treatment of wrist trauma.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 7 | Pages 967 - 970
1 Sep 2002
Karnezis IA Fragkiadakis EG

Although the outcome of fractures of the distal radius is traditionally assessed using objective clinical variables such as grip strength and range of movement of the wrist, the extent to which they reflect function and outcomes of importance for the patient is uncertain. This may cause considerable inconsistencies in the assessment of outcome using current scoring systems. We prospectively studied 31 patients recovering from unstable fractures of the distal radius in order to investigate the association between objective variables and the level of post-traumatic disability of the wrist as measured by the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score.

Multiple regression showed considerable differences in the extent to which limitations in specific objective clinical variables reflected the level of disability of the wrist. Grip strength was shown to be a significant predictor of the PRWE score (regression coefficient −1.09, 95% confidence interval −1.76 to −0.42, p < 0.01) and thus appears to be a sensitive indicator of return of function of the wrist. Forearm rotation and flexion and extension of the wrist were not significantly associated with the PRWE score. These observations should be taken into account during the evaluation of methods of treatment and in constructing future clinical outcome scoring systems.