The Cartiva synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) entered mainstream use in the management of first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthritis following the positive results of large trials in 2016. Limited information is available on the longer-term outcomes of this implant within the literature, particularly when independent from the originator. This single-centre cohort study investigates the efficacy of the Cartiva SCI at up to five years. First MTPJ arthritis was radiologically graded according to the Hattrup and Johnson (HJ) classification. Preoperative and sequential postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were evaluated using the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), and the activities of daily living (ADL) sub-section of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).Aims
Methods
Cartiva synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) is licenced for use in management of symptomatic hallux rigidus in several countries including the UK. As for now, there are no independent comparative series for treatment of hallux rigidus utilising polyvinyl alcohol implants. Patients at a single centre with symptomatic hallux rigidus who underwent Cartiva SCI implant procedure were identified. First metatarsophalangeal joint arthritis was radiographically graded according to the Hattrup and Johnson (HJ) classification. Pre-operative and post-operative patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) activities of daily living subscale and the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ).Objectives
Study design and methods
Patient reported outcome and experience measures have been a fundamental part of the NHS. We used PROMS2.0, a semi-automated web-based system, which allows collection and analysis of outcome data, to assess the patient reported outcome/experience measures for scarf+/− akin osteotomy for hallux valgus. Prospective PROMs/PREMs data was collected. Scores used to asses outcomes included EQ-5D VAS, EQ-5D Health Index, and MOxFQ, collected pre-operatively and post-operatively (Post-op follow-up 6–12months) Patient Personal Experience (PPE-15) was collected postoperatively.Background
Methods
The Mobility™ prosthesis [Depuy] is the most extensively used TAR in the UK, though there are few published results. We present our complete experience of the Mobility prosthesis in a diverse population. From March 2005 to December 2009, 84 consecutive Mobility ankle replacements were performed by the senior author, in 79 patients (28 female, 51 male) with mean age 64.5 years (43–80). This complete cohort included the first and last cases with this implant. Mean follow-up was 50.1±18.2 months (range 14–86). Patients with ankle replacements in situ, were reviewed clinically and radiologically. Clinical outcome measures were: AOFAS score, MOXFQ (adapted for the ankle), and VAS for pain. Post-operative radiographs were reviewed to assess component position and examine for zones of lucency.Introduction
Methods
The most important determinant of treatment of malleolar fractures is stability. Stable fractures have an intact deep deltoid ligament and do not displace with functional treatment. If the deep deltoid/medial malleolar complex is disrupted, the talus is at risk of displacement. We developed clinical criteria for potential instability and applied them to a prospective series of patients. Criteria included: a medial clear space of <
4mm; medial tenderness, bruising or swelling; a fibular fracture above the syndesmosis; a bimalleolar or trimalleolar fracture; an open fracture; a high-energy fracture mechanism. Patients with a medial clear space of <
4mm and none of these criteria were considered to have stable fractures, while those with a medial clear space of >
4mm were considered to have a displaced fracture. We studied 152 consecutive skeletally mature patients with undisplaced, potentially unstable malleolar fractures treated by the senior author between 1st January 1998 and 31st December 2007. Patients were treated in a below-knee walking cast (136 patients) or a functional ankle brace (16 patients) for six weeks. Weight bearing was encouraged throughout. Weight bearing radiographs were obtained at one week and six weeks. Displacement was defined as talar displacement with a medial clear space >
4mm. Demographic, clinical and radiological data were collected prospectively. There were 88 male and 64 female patients, with a median age of 43 years. Criteria for possible instability were: medial tenderness, 115 patients; proximal fibular fracture, 29 patients; bimalleolar fracture, 17 patients; other criteria, 15 patients. Three fractures displaced (risk of displacement 2.0%, 95% CI 0.4–5.7%). All displaced within the first week and were treated by open reduction and internal fixation. One bimalleolar fracture developed a symptomatic medial malleolar non-union which was treated by percutaneous screw fixation (risk of non-union 5.9%, 95% CI 0.1%–28.7%). All the other fractures achieved clinical union by 8 weeks.
Templating of preoperative radiographs is routinely recommended prior to knee arthroplasty. We performed this study to assess the reproducibility and accuracy of the templates for three commonly used knee implants (PFC, Kinemax, Scorpio). Six lower limb surgeons templated 10 patients for each of the three designs. The inter and intra-observer reliability and accuracy was calculated. There was marked variation in the reliability of the templating with the tibial insert scoring better than the femoral and the Kinemax being the most reproducible of the three. In general, the intra-observer scores (κ= 0.57–0.81) were better than the inter-observer ones (κ= 0.21–0.60). The Scorpio was the most accurately templated of the three implants, with the percentage correlating with what was actually implanted ranging from 55–62% for the femur and 72–75% for the tibia, with no templated sizes more than 1 size different from the actual implant. The other implants ranged from 38–42% for the femur and 53–58% for the tibia with both having up to 3% more than 1 size difference from the actual implant. We believe that the use of templating in total knee arthroplasty should be interpreted with caution and we urge the development of more accurate prosthesis sizing techniques.
Pre-operative range of movement (expressed as a percentage of the total ROM of the unaffected side) was 51.5 % (range 23.8–67.2). The mean postoperative ROM was 85.4% (range 56.2 – 99.3). External rotation improved from 41.7% (range 23.5 – 81.5) of the unaffected side preoperatively to 77.7% (range 44.1 – 105.3) at final review. Abduction improved from 47.4 % (range 23.3 – 70.6) to 85.4% (range 49.7 – 100) and forward flexion improved from 59.1% (range 33.5 – 73.9) to 90o (range 64.3 – 100.6). No patients required further manipulation.