Rectus femoris avulsion (RFA) injuries in paediatric patients are currently managed conservatively. However, the proximal attachment of the rectus femoris muscle lies in a critical zone in the hip joint with attachments to the anterior hip capsule and anterior inferior iliac spine. Violent avulsions therefore could cause damage to the adjacent acetabular labrum and articular cartilage initiating a process leading to early degenerative changes in the hip. To date, the association between rectus avulsions and labral tears has not been studied. The complete medical records of patients who were presented to McMaster University Medical Center with rectus femoris avulsions between 1983 and 2008 who were between the ages of 2 and 18 were identified. Patients were included if they had documented plain radiographs and magnetic resonance arthrography images of their hip. MRIs were reviewed by an independent musculoskeletal radiologist blinded from the history of the patients.Purpose
Method
The ability to correctly interpret quantitative results is a crucial skill developed in medical school and surgical residency. It demands a basic understanding of epidemiological principles and modes of presenting data. Yet, there has been little investigation into the efficacy of current teaching methods and areas of difficulty among orthopaedic residents. Forty orthopaedic residents attended a research course provided by the main author in preparation for this assessment. Immediately after formal teaching, these residents were administered a survey that assessed residents perceived and actual level of understanding of basic modes of presenting results including number needed to treat (NNT), relative risk (RR), odds ratio (OR), and absolute risk reduction (ARR). Residents were given a multiple choice clinical case scenario of fracture nonunion and asked to choose which result would be most efficacious at reducing nonunion. An All are equally efficacious option was given for each question. The multiple choice answers were purposefully identical with regard to effect size but answers differed in the way they were presented.Purpose
Method