The trapeziometacarpal joint (TMCJ) is the most common hand joint affected by osteoarthritis (OA), and trapezium implant arthroplasty is a potential treatment for recalcitrant OA. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of various trapezium implants as an interventional option for TMCJ OA. Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library databases were searched for relevant studies up to May 2022. Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines were adhered to and registered on PROSPERO. The methodological quality was assessed by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute tools for observational studies and the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Subgroup analyses were performed on different replacement implants, the analysis was done via Open Meta-Analyst software and P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

A total of 123 studies comprising 5752 patients were included. Total joint replacement (TJR) implants demonstrate greater significant improvements in visual analogue scale pain scores postoperatively. Interposition with partial trapezial resection implants was associated with the highest grip strength and highest reduction in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. Revision rates were highest in TJR (12.3%), and lowest in interposition with partial trapezial resection (6.2%).

Total joint replacement and interposition with partial trapezial resection implants improve pain, grip strength, and DASH scores more than other implant options. Future studies should focus on high-quality randomized clinical trials comparing different implants to accumulate higher quality evidence and more reliable conclusions.

Non-invasive assessment of lower limb mechanical alignment and assessment of knee laxity using navigation technology is now possible during knee flexion owing to recent software developments. We report a comparison of this new technology with a validated commercially available invasive navigation system.

We tested cadaveric lower limbs (n=12) with a commercial invasive navigation system against the non-invasive system. Mechanical femorotibial angle (MFTA) was measured with no stress, then with 15Nm of varus and valgus moment. MFTA was recorded at 10° intervals from full knee extension to 90° flexion. The investigator was blinded to all MFTA measurements. Repeatability coefficient was calculated to reflect each system's level of precision, and agreement between the systems; 3° was chosen as the upper limit of precision and agreement when measuring MFTA in the clinical setting based on current literature.

Precision of the invasive system was superior and acceptable in all conditions of stress throughout flexion (repeatability coefficient <2°). Precision of the non-invasive system was acceptable from extension until 60° flexion (repeatability coefficient <3°), beyond which precision was unacceptable. Agreement between invasive and non-invasive systems was within 1.7° from extension to 50° flexion when measuring MFTA with no varus / valgus applied. When applying varus / valgus stress agreement between the systems was acceptable from full extension to 20° & 30° knee flexion respectively (repeatability coefficient <3°). Beyond this the systems did not demonstrate sufficient agreement.

These results indicate that the non-invasive system can provide reliable quantitative data on MFTA and laxity in the range relevant to knee examination.

Conventional computer navigation systems using bone fixation have been validated in measuring anteroposterior (AP) translation of the tibia. Recent developments in non-invasive skin-mounted systems may allow quantification of AP laxity in the out-patient setting.

We tested cadaveric lower limbs (n=12) with a commercial image free navigation system using passive trackers secured by bone screws. We then tested a non-invasive fabric-strap system. The lower limb was secured at 10° intervals from 0° to 60° knee flexion and 100N of force applied perpendicular to the tibial tuberosity using a secured dynamometer. Repeatability coefficient was calculated both to reflect precision within each system, and demonstrate agreement between the two systems at each flexion interval. An acceptable repeatability coefficient of ≤3mm was set based on diagnostic criteria for ACL insufficiency when using other mechanical devices to measure AP tibial translation.

Precision within the individual invasive and non-invasive systems measuring AP translation of the tibia was acceptable throughout the range of flexion tested (repeatability coefficient ≤1.6mm). Agreement between the two systems was acceptable when measuring AP laxity between full extension and 40° knee flexion (repeatability coefficient ≤2.1mm). Beyond 40° of flexion, agreement between the systems was unacceptable (repeatability coefficient >3mm).

These results indicate that from full knee extension to 40° flexion, non-invasive navigation-based quantification of AP tibial translation is as accurate as the standard invasive system, particularly in the clinically and functionally important range of 20° to 30° knee flexion. This could be useful in diagnosis and post-operative follow-up of ACL pathology.

Introduction

The anatomy of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint and, in particular, the metatarsosesamoid articulation remains poorly understood. The movements of the sesamoids in relation to the metatarsal plays a key role in the function of the first MTP joint. Although the disorders affecting the sesamoids are described well, the movements of the metatarsosesamoid joints and the pathomechanics of these joints have not been described. We have performed a cadaver study detailing and quantifying the three dimensional movements occurring at these joints.

Isolated talonavicular arthrodesis is a common procedure particularly for posttraumatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Two surgical approaches are commonly used: the medial and the dorsal approach. It is recognized that access to the lateral aspect of the talonavicular joint can be limited when using the medial approach and it is our experience that using the dorsal approach addresses this issue.

We performed an anatomical study using cadaver specimens, to compare the amount of articular surface that can be accessed, and therefore prepared for arthodesis, by each surgical approach. Medial and dorsal approaches to the talonavicular joint were performed on each of 11 cadaveric specimens (10 fresh frozen, 1 embalmed). Distraction of the joint was performed as used intraoperatively for preparation of articular surfaces during talonavicular arthrodesis. The accessible area of articular surface was marked for each of the two approaches using a previous reported technique. Disarticulation was performed and the marked surface area was quantified using an immersion digital microscribe, allowing a three dimensional virtual model of the articular surfaces to be assessed.

The median percentage of accessible total talonavicular articular surface for the medial and dorsal approaches was 71% and 92% respectively. This difference was significant (Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test, p< 0.001).

This study provides quantifiable measurements of the articular surface accessible by the medial and dorsal approaches to the talonavicular joint. These data support for the use of the dorsal approach for talonavicular arthrodesis.

Introduction

The superficial anterior vasculature of the knee is variably described; most of our information comes from anatomical literature. Descriptions commonly emphasise medial-dominant genicular branches of the popliteal artery. Quantifying the relative contribution of medial and lateral vessels to the anastomotic network of the anterior knee may help provide grounds for selecting one of a number of popular incisions for arthrotomy.