Ceramic-on-metal hip replacements (COM, where the head is a Biolox Delta ceramic and liner is Co Cr alloy), have demonstrated reduced wear under standard conditions in vitro compared to metal-on-metal (MOM) [1]. Early clinical results are also encouraging [2]. Recently concerns have been raised regarding the poor clinical performance of MOM hip resurfacings [3], particularly when cups are steeply inclined. Laboratory hip simulator testing has been used to replicate edge loading, also demonstrating elevated wear [4]. Therefore, a range of conditions to replicate sub-optimal use clinically to better predict in vivo performance should be used. The aim of this study was to compare the wear rates of MOM and COM under adverse edge loading conditions in an in vitro hip simulator test. Ceramic-on-metal (n=3) and metal-on-metal (n=3) 36mm hip prostheses (supplied by DePuy International Ltd, UK) were tested in the Leeds Physiological Anatomical Hip Joint Simulator. Liners were mounted to provide a clinical angle of 45o, and stems positioned anatomically. A simplified gait cycle and microseparation was applied as previously described [5] for two million cycles in 25% new born calf serum. Gravimetric analysis was completed every million cycles and wear volumes calculated.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
Hip wear simulation is a widely used technique for the pre-clinical evaluation of new bearing designs. However, wear rates seen in vitro can often be significantly different to those seen clinically. This can be attributed to the difference between the optimal conditions in a simulator and wide ranging conditions in real patients. This study aimed to develop more clinically relevant simulator tests, looking specifically at the effects of cup inclination angle (in vivo) and stop-dwell-start (SDS) protocols on a clinically available product. Five tests using a Paul type walking cycle (ISO 14242) were carried out on two ProSim hip simulators:
28mm MoM, standard walking, cup inclination 45°, (n = 5) 36mm MoM, standard walking, cup 45°, (n = 4) 36mm MOM, SDS: 10 walking cycles and pause of 5s with stance load of 1250N cup 45°, (n = 5) 36mm MOM, SDS: 10 walking cycles and pause of 30s with stance load of 1250N, (n = 5) cup 45° 36mm MOM, standard walking, cup 55°(n = 5), and 65°(n = 5). All samples had matched clearances, measured using a CMM (Prismo Navigator, Zeiss, Germany). Wear was measured gravimetrically (Sartorius ME235S: 0.01mg).Introduction
Method
