It is becoming increasingly common for a patient
to have ipsilateral hip and knee replacements. The inter-prosthetic (IP)
distance, the distance between the tips of hip and knee prostheses,
has been thought to be associated with an increased risk of IP fracture.
Small gap distances are generally assumed to act as stress risers,
although there is no real biomechanical evidence to support this. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of IP
distance, cortical thickness and bone mineral density on the likelihood
of an IP femoral fracture. A total of 18 human femur specimens were randomised into three
groups by bone density and cortical thickness. For each group, a
defined IP distance of 35 mm, 80 mm or 160 mm was created by choosing
the appropriate lengths of component. The maximum fracture strength
was determined using a four-point bending test. The fracture force of all three groups was similar (p = 0.498).
There was a highly significant correlation between the cortical
area and the fracture strength (r = 0.804, p <
0.001), whereas
bone density showed no influence. This study suggests that the IP distance has little influence
on fracture strength in IP femoral fractures: the thickness of the
cortex seems to be the decisive factor. Cite this article:
From a mechanical point of view, the clinical use of pedicle screws in the atlas is a promising alternative to lateral mass screws due to an increased biomechanical fixation. The most established surgical technique for posterior screw fixation in the atlas (C1) is realised by screw placement through the lateral mass [1]. This surgical placement may lead to extended bleeding from the paravertebral venous plexus as well as a violation of the axis (C2) nerve roots [1]. Using pedicle screws is an emerging technique which utilises the canal passing through the posterior arch enabling the use of longer screws with a greater contact area while avoiding the venous plexus and axis nerve roots. The aim of this Summary Statement
Introduction
