Over 62,000 total hip arthroplasty (THA) cases are performed each year in Canada, with an estimated annual healthcare system cost of $1.4 billion and resulting in 4 billion tonnes of waste annually (6,600 tonnes per day). The aims of this study were 1) Assess satisfaction of current/standard set-up amongst different stakeholders. 2) Assess energy, economic and waste cost of current set up and apply lean methodology to improve efficiency 3. Design and test SLIM setup based on lean principles and its ability to be safely implemented into everyday practice.

A Needs Assessment Survey was circulated to OR nursing staff to assess the need for change in the current THA OR setup at an academic tertiary referral hospital. Through feedback, surgeon input, and careful analysis of current instrumentation, the “SLIM setup” was created. Standard instrument tray numbers for elective THA were reduced from 9 to 3 trays. Eighty patients were then randomised to either the standard or SLIM setup. Four staff arthroplasty surgeons each randomised 20 patients to either standard or SLIM setup. OR time, blood loss, 90-day complication rates, cost/case, instrument weight (kg/case), total waste in kg/case (non-recyclable), case set-up time, and number of times and number of extra trays required were compared between groups.

The majority of nursing staff demonstrated dissatisfaction with the current THA setup and felt current processes lacked efficiency. Use of the SLIM setup, was associated with the following savings in comparison to standard (Trays = −6 (720kg/case); Waste = −1.5 kg/case; Cost = − $560 ($50.00 × 6 trays + 10min saved × $26.00 /min OR setup time)). OR time, blood loss and 90-day complication rate were not statistically different (p >0.05); however, set up time was significantly shorter in comparison to standard. Extra instrumentation was opened in < 10% of cases.

A more minimalist approach to THA can be undertaken using the SLIM setup, potentially resulting in cost, energy and waste savings. Estimate savings of $560,000 and 1.65 tonnes reduction in waste per 1,000 THAs performed may be realised.

Dysglycemia in the post-operative period has been associated with increased rates of infection following total joint arthroplasty. Additionally, patients without clinical diagnosis of diabetes with hemoglobin A1c% values between 5.7% and 6.4% have been shown to be dysglycemic in the peri-operative period. This study examines the influence of post-operative blood glucose management on rates of re-operation for infection in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty in diabetic, and clinically non-diabetic patients.

We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data, for all primary, elective total hip and total knee arthroplasties performed at The Ottawa Hospital between April 2010 and October 2017. Kaplan-Meier survivorship, and mutivarient regression analysis were used to determine predictors of infection based on pre-operative diabetes status, HbA1c%, and post-operative insulin management.

4159 joints met inclusion criteria. Patients with HbA1c 5.7–6.4% had lower rate of revision for infection if they received post-operative blood glucose management (0.80%), vs without glucose management (1.20%). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis showed this difference to be insignificant (p=0.23). Patients with DM1 had statistically worse survivorship when compared to other groups (p=0.010).

Patients with undiagnosed perioperative dysglycemia may be at a greater predisposition for developing infection, requiring re-operation, following total joint arthroplasty. This study may be underpowered due to overall low rates of revision. More rigorous peri-operative glucose management strategies may be required for patients, who otherwise receive no glycemic management outside of hospital. This is more pertinent with trends towards decreasing post-operative lengths-of-stay.

The effectiveness of total hip replacement as a surgical intervention has revolutionized the care of degenerative conditions of the hip joint. However, the surgeon is still left with important decisions in regards to how best deliver that care with choice of surgical approach being one of them especially in regards to the short-term clinical outcome. It is however unclear if a particular surgical approach offers a long-term advantage. This study aims to determine the influence of the three main surgical approaches to the hip on patient reported outcomes and quality of life after 5 years post-surgery.

We extracted from our prospective database all the patients who underwent a Total Hip Replacement surgery for osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis between 2008 and 2012 by an anterior, posterior or lateral approach. All the pre-operative and post-operative HOOS (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) and WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) scores were noted. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVAs) were used to study the relationship between amount of change in HOOS and WOMAC subscales (dependant variables) and approach used, by also including confounding factors of age, gender, ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score, Charnley score and Body Mass Index. A total of 1895 patients underwent a primary total hip arthroplasty during the considered period. Among them, 367 had pre-operative and ≥5 years post operative PROM scores (19.47%)

The mean follow-up for the study cohort was 5.3 years (range 5 to 7 years) with, 277 at 5 years, 63 at 6 years, and 27 at 7 years. In the posterior approach group we had 138 patients (37.60%), 104 in the lateral approach (28.34%) and 125 in the anterior approach (34.06%). There were no significant differences between the 3 groups concerning the Charnley classification, BMI, Gender, ASA score, side and pre-operative functional scores. We did not observe any significant difference in the amount of change in HOOS and WOMAC subscales between the 3 groups. There were no differences either in the post-operative scores in ultimate value.

Our monocentric observational study shows that these three approaches provide predictable and comparable outcomes on HRQL and PROMs at long-term follow-up both in terms of final outcome but also in percent improvement. This study has several limitations. We excluded patients who underwent revision surgery leaving the unanswered question of how choice of surgical approach could lead to different revision rates, which have an impact on the functional outcomes. Moreover, even if we controlled for the most important confounders by a multivariate analysis model, there is still some involved cofounders, which could potentially lead to a bias such as smoking, socio-economical status or femoral head diameter. But we do not have any reason to think that these parameters could be unequally distributed between the three groups. Finally, our study cohort represents of 19.47% of the complete cohort. The fact that not all patients have PROM's was pre-determined as eight years ago we instituted that only 1 in 5 patients that returned their pre-operative questionnaire would get their PROM's at follow-up. Despite this, our statistical power was sufficient.

Cementless femoral fixation is the gold standard in revision hip arthroplasty. Distal fixation is achieved using either a cobalt chrome or titanium stem. The purpose of this study is to report the long-term survivorship and clinical outcome of a titanium, long-stemmed, load-bearing calcar-replacement femoral component from an independent centre.

Eighty-one patients (average seventy-four years, range thirty-five to ninety-one) underwent hip arthroplasty with the Mallory-Head calcar-replacement femoral component, by a single surgeon. There were thirty-eight males and forty-three females with fifty-four hips initially revised for aseptic loosening, thirteen for peri-prosthetic fracture, and five for infection as a two-stage procedure. The implant was used as a primary device in eight patients with deformed proximal femurs. At most-recent follow-up, radiographic analysis was conducted and clinical outcome scoring was assessed using the SF-12, Harris Hip Score, and WOMAC questionnaire for surviving patients. Complications were also reviewed.

At a mean follow-up of 7.4 years (range four to fifteen), eight patients have died. There was one deep infection, three DVT’s, and two dislocations in the perioperative period. Six femoral stems have ultimately required another revision surgery for aseptic loosening, two for infection, and 1 for implant fracture at a mean of 5.6 years after initial revision. Four patients required removal of the proximal trochanteric bolt due to breakage or loosening. Overall survival of the implant at five years is 95% (CI 0.87–0.98) and 87% (CI 0.72–0.94) at ten years.

The clinical outcome of the Mallory-Head calcar-replacement femoral revision stem is reported from an independent centre. Although the results are encouraging, it would appear that proximal load-bearing fixation with the calcar-replacement stem is not as reliable as distal fixation. The use of a trochanteric bolt was associated with fracture of the greater trochanter or need for a separate surgical procedure for removal. For this series, there was an overall 11% failure rate at a mean follow-up of 7.4 years. The mechanical failure rate is 7.4%. Our overall and mechanical failure rates are somewhat higher than those of the implant developers, who reported 94% overall survival, and a 1.9% mechanical failure rate at a mean follow-up of eleven years.

There is theoretical concern that volar plating has a disadvantage in cantilever bending when axially loaded dorsal to the neutral axis. This has implications for postoperative rehabilitation protocols and overall outcomes related to maintenance of reduction. Most recent biomechanical studies have compared volar locking plates to traditional dorsal non-locked plates. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of volar and dorsal locking plate fixation in a model of dorsally unstable distal radius fractures.

Fourteen synthetic composite radii (Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA) were used for this study. A dorsally unstable, extra-articular distal radius fracture was simulated by creating a dorsal wedge-shaped defect in the distal metaphysis. Half of the specimens were plated dorsally (n=7) while the other half were plated volarly (n=7) with 2.4mm distal radius locking T-plates (Synthes, Canada). Each specimen was loaded axially in five different positions: central (along the neutral axis of the radius) as well as dorsal, volar, radial and ulnar to the neutral axis using a MTS Sintech 1/G materials testing machine (MTS Systems, Eden Prairie, MN). The plated radii were loaded to 100 N in each position simulating physiological loading during normal range of motion. The main outcome measure was construct stiffness of the plate-bone system (slope of load-displacement curve) for all five loading positions.

Construct stiffness with dorsal locking plates was seven times greater than volar locking plates when dorsally loaded (p < 0.001), 60% greater when centrally loaded (p = 0.055) and 35% greater when volarly loaded (p = 0.029). There was no significant difference in stiffness with any other loading configurations.

The stability of dorsal locking plate fixation is superior to volar locking plate fixation in the setting of large dorsal defects in the distal radius. This is applicable to both fractures with dorsal comminution and dorsal opening-wedge distal radial osteotomies. Further clinical investigation is needed to compare functional outcomes and complication rates between modern dorsal and volar locking plate techniques.