Performance of metal-on-metal (MOM) bearings was of great interest until recently. Major concerns emerged over high incidence of MOM-wear failures and initially there appeared greater risks with MOM total hip arthroplasty (THA) designs compared to resurfacing arthroplasty (RSA). Impingement of the metal neck against the THA cup was likely the differentiating risk. There is a major difference between RSA and THA in (i) size of femoral necks and (ii) risk of THA metal necks impinging on metal cups. For example, a 46mm THA with 12.5mm neck, a 3.68 head:neck (H/N) ratio, provides a suitably large range-of-motion (ROM). In contrast, an RSA patient with retained 31mm size of natural neck would only have H/N = 1.48, indicating even less ROM than a Charnley THA. However, the enigma is that RSA patients have as good or better ROM in majority of clinical studies. We studied this apparent RSA vs THA dilemma by examining MOM retrievals for signs of adverse impingement. We previously described CoCr stripe wear in failed THA bearings, notably alignment of polar and basal wear stripes coincident with the rim profiles of the cups (Clarke 2013). Our governing hypothesis was that RSA patients had to routinely sublux their hips to get ROM comparable to THA. Our THA impingement studies showed polar stripes within 15o of the polar axis in large heads. For the various RSA diameters, we calculated that wear stripes angled 40o from the femoral axis could indicate impingement with no subluxation, whereas smaller angles would indicate routine subluxation of RSA femoral-shell from cup. We compared explanted RSA (N=15) and THA (N=15) bearings representing three vendors (42–54mm diameters). Wear maps and head-stripes were ink-marked for visualization, photography, and analysis. Wear areas were calculated using spherical equations and wear-stripe angles measured by computer graphics.

The results showed that RSA femoral shells had wear areas circular in shape with areas varying 1,085- 3,121mm2. These averaged 14% larger than in matched THA heads but statistically significant difference was not proven. Polar stripes were readily identifiable on femoral components, 75% for RSA cases and 100% for THA. These contained identical linear scratches and all were sited within 30o of neck axis, confirming our hypothesis that RSA patients had to sublux their hips to achieve same motion as THA. Examination of cup wear areas revealed all showed ‘edge-loading’, but RSA cups had a significantly greater degree.

Retrieval studies are limited by uncontrolled case sources, varied brands, and small numbers. In this study, we were able to match RSA and THA cases by vendor and diameter. The RSA retrievals revealed polar stripes identical to THA by site, topography and inclination to femoral-neck axis. This confirmed our starting hypothesis and explained the large clinical ROM available in RSA patients. The larger wear areas on RSA femoral shells, although not statistically significant, and the larger ‘edge loading’ sites in RSA cups appeared as further support for routine subluxation of femoral-shells during hip impingement.

Metal-on-metal (MOM) retrieval studies have demonstrated that CoCr bearings used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and resurfacing (RSA) featured stripe wear damage on heads, likely created by rim impact with CoCr cups.^1-3 Such subluxation damage may release quantities of large CoCr particles that would provoke aggressive 3^rd-body wear. With RSA, the natural femoral neck reduces the head-neck ratio but avoids risk of metal-to-metal impingement (Fig. 1).⁴ For this study, twelve retrieved RSA were compared to 12 THA (Table 1), evaluating, (i) patterns of habitual wear, (ii) stripe-wear damage and (iii) 3^rd-body abrasive scratches. Considering RSA have head/neck ratios much lower than large-diameter THA, any impingement damage should be uniquely positioned on the heads.

Twelve RSA and THA retrievals were selected with respect to similar diameter range and vendors with follow-up ranging typically 1–6 years (Table 1). Patterns of habitual wear were mapped to determine position in vivo. Stripe damage was mapped at three sites: polar, equatorial and basal. Wear patterns were examined using SEM and white light interferometry (WLI). Graphical models characterized the complex geometry of the natural femoral neck in coronal and sagittal planes and provided RSA head-neck ratios.⁴

Normal area patterns of habitual wear were similar on RSA and THA bearings. The wear patterns showing cup rim-breakout proved larger for RSA cups than THA. Polar stripes presented in juxtaposition to the polar axis in both RSA and THA (Fig. 1). As anticipated, basal stripes on RSA occurred at steeper cup-impingement angles (CIA) than THA. The micro-topography of stripe damage was similar on both RSA and THA heads. Some scratches were illustrative of 3^rd-body wear featuring raised lips, punctuated terminuses, and crater-like depressions (Fig. 2).

Neck narrowing observed following RSA procedures may be a consequence of impingement and subluxation due to the small head-neck ratios. However, lacking a metal femoral neck, such RSA impingement would not result in metal debris being released. Nevertheless it has been suggested that cup-to-head impingement produced large CoCr particles and also cup “edge wear” as the head orbits the cup rim.⁴ Our study showed that impingement had occurred as evidenced by the polar stripes and 3^rd-body wear by large hard particles as evidenced by the wide scratches with raised lips. We can therefore agree with the prior study, that 2-body and 3rd-body wear mechanisms were present in both RSA and THA retrievals.