Aims

The authors present the results of a cohort study of 60 adult patients presenting sequentially over a period of 15 years from 1997 to 2012 to our hospital for treatment of thoracic and/or lumbar vertebral burst fractures, but without neurological deficit.

The revised Tokuhashi, Tomita and modified Bauer scores are commonly used to make difficult decisions in the management of patients presenting with spinal metastases. A prospective cohort study of 199 consecutive patients presenting with spinal metastases, treated with either surgery and/or radiotherapy, was used to compare the three systems. Cox regression, Nagelkerke’s R² and Harrell’s concordance were used to compare the systems and find their best predictive items. The three systems were equally good in terms of overall prognostic performance. Their most predictive items were used to develop the Oswestry Spinal Risk Index (OSRI), which has a similar concordance, but a larger coefficient of determination than any of these three scores. A bootstrap procedure was used to internally validate this score and determine its prediction optimism.

The OSRI is a simple summation of two elements: primary tumour pathology (PTP) and general condition (GC): OSRI = PTP + (2 – GC).

This simple score can predict life expectancy accurately in patients presenting with spinal metastases. It will be helpful in making difficult clinical decisions without the delay of extensive investigations.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:210–16.

We present a review of 553 patients who underwent surgery for intractable sciatica ascribed to prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. One surgeon in one institution undertook or supervised all the operations over a period of 16 years.

The total number of primary discectomies included in the study was 531, of which 42 subsequently required a second operation for recurrent sciatica, giving a revision rate of 7.9%. Factors associated with reoperation were analysed. A contained disc protrusion was almost three times more likely to need revision surgery, compared with extruded or sequestrated discs. Patients with primary protrusions had a significantly greater straight-leg raise and reduced incidence of positive neurological findings compared with those with extruded or sequestrated discs. These patients should therefore be selected out clinically and treated by a more enthusiastic conservative programme, since they are three times more likely to require revision surgery.

Objective: To determine if (a) inflammatory mediators are present in herniated intervertebral discs and (b) if their presence correlates with inflammation of nerve roots or symptoms.

Design: Inflammation was assessed with gadolinium enhancement of MRI. Neurological compromise was measured. Disc tissue was examined for inflammatory mediators IL-1α and β, IL-6, MCP-1, TSG-6, iNOS, TNFα and thromboxane.

Patients: Sixty-five discs were removed from 64 patients undergoing surgery for disc prolapse.

Outcome measures: We developed (i) an MRI score to assess inflammation radiologically prior to surgery (n=28, mean 4.9±6.8 days), (ii) a Surgical Score to assess inflammation of the nerve roots at surgery (n=44), (iii) a Clinical Score to determine pain, disability and neurological compromise (n=17) and (iv) a Mediator Score to reflect the number and amount of inflammatory mediators present (n=20).

Results: Thirty percent of the prolapses in this study were extrusions, 19% sequestrations and 51% protrusions. Sixteen of the 28 patients with gadolinium had nerve root enhancement (86% of the extrusions, 57% of sequestrations, and 43% of protrusions), whilst 19 had enhancement of or around the disc herniation itself (71% of the extrusions, 86% of sequestrations and 57% of protrusions). The Mediator Scores were highest for the sequestrations (as was the Surgical Score) and lowest for the protrusions, but extruded discs had most IL-1α and β, IL-6, TNFα and thromboxane. Extruded discs had the highest Clinical Score and sequestrated the lowest.

Conclusions: Mediators produced in prolapsed disc appear to play an important role in inflammation of adjacent tissue and nerve roots. The type of mediator present and proximity of the prolapse to the nerve root may be the important factors in determining which pro-lapses are the most painful.

Objective: To identify risk factors associated with patients that required revision surgery for sciatica.

Design: A retrospective study of 580 patients who underwent surgery for intractable sciatica attributable to pro-lapsed lumbar intervertebral disc from 1986 to 2000 inclusive.

Subjects: The study included a total of 580 patients. Of these seven patients had an operation at two levels, 25 patients had had a primary operation elsewhere and were therefore excluded; four sets of notes remain missing. The total number of primary operations analysed was therefore 558.

Outcome measures: Parameters such as gender, age, level and side of discectomy were entered into a database for analysis. Diagnostic and clinical parameters were also entered; these included the value of the angle of the straight leg raise recorded and absence or presence of neurological deficit (altered sensation, reduced motor power, and absent or diminished reflexes). Operative findings recorded and entered were the type of disc at operation (i. e. protrusion, extrusion and sequestration) and the presence of free cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), however minor, indicating a dural tear.

Results: The total number of primary discectomies was 558 of which 43 went on to require a second operation, giving a revision rate of 7.71%. Of the primary discectomies, 356 were protrusions, 92 extrusions and 110 sequestration. Of the 43 that went onto revision surgery, 35 were protrusions, two extrusion and six sequestration. A significant association was found with primary disc protrusions, this type of disc prolapse was almost three times more likely to go on to need revision surgery compared to extruded or sequestrated discs. Data analysed on primary protrusions showed these patients had a significantly greater straight leg raise angle and reduced incidence of positive neurological findings and so could be identified clinically.

Conclusions: This lead us to conclude that the group of patients with primary protrusions could be selected out and treated conservatively since they are three times more likely to require revision surgery.

Objective: The shape of articular chondrocytes regulates their function, changes in response to mechanical load and is altered in osteoarthritis. We aimed to identify the shape of intervertebral disc cells in pathological and normal tissue.

Design: Immunohistology of human intervertebral discs using cytoskeletal markers to examine disc cell shape.

Subjects: Intervertebral discs from patients with degeneration (n=3), scoliosis (n=3), spondylolisthesis (n=3) and from non-pathological cadaveric spines (n=3).

Outcome measures: (i). Cell shape and (ii). Organisation/ content of cytoskeleton.

Results: In degenerate and normal discs, cells of the anulus fibrosus were generally elongated and bipolar, whilst those of the nucleus pulposus were rounded/oval. However, in localised areas, cells were observed with multiple cytoplasmic processes that extended into the discal matrix. In central regions of scoliotic and, most markedly, spondylolisthetic discs, such cells were more frequent. Their processes were vimentin positive (but F-actin negative) and reached up to 80μm in length. F-actin was clearly present in endothelial cells of blood vessels but absent in disc cells. In contrast, vimentin was expressed by disc cells within the discs’ inner regions, but not towards the outer anulus fibrosus.

Conclusions: The altered shape of disc cells in pathological tissue may reflect areas of abnormal loading. These changes are also likely to affect/reflect altered cell function and therefore have a role to play in the pathological process.

We analysed prospectively 26 patients who had revision operations for ipsilateral recurrent radicular pain after a period of pain relief of more than six months following primary discectomy. They were assessed before the initial operation, between the two procedures and at a minimum of two years after reoperation. MRI was performed before primary discectomy and reoperation. Fifty consecutive patients who had a disc excision during the study period but did not have recurrent radicular pain, were analysed as a control group.

Of the study group 42% related the onset of recurrent radicular pain to an isolated injury or a precipitating event, but none of the control group did so (p < 0.001). T2-weighted MRI performed before primary discectomy showed that patients in the study group had significantly more severe disc degeneration compared with the control group (p = 0.02). Intraoperative findings revealed recurrent disc herniation in 24 patients and bulging of the disc in two, one of whom also had lateral stenosis. Epidural scarring was found to be abundant, intraoperatively and on MRI, in eight and in nine patients, respectively.

At the last follow-up, the clinical outcome was satisfactory in 85% of patients in the study group and in 88% of the control group (p > 0.05). Work or daily activities had been resumed at the same level as before the onset of symptoms by 81% of the patients in the study group and 84% of the control group. No correlation was found between the amount of epidural fibrosis, as seen intraoperatively and on MRI, and the result of surgery. The recurrence of radicular pain caused no significant changes in the psychological profile compared with the assessment before the primary discectomy.