Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 23 - 23
1 May 2015
Evans J Armstrong A Edwards S Wilson M
Full Access

The correct prescription of antibiotics for in-patients is paramount to patient safety. Trust policy states that all in-patients on antibiotics must have a start date, duration, and indication for antibiotics documented on the drug-card. On a single day all drug-cards were reviewed assessing whether documentation was in line with policy. In the initial audit, 28 antibiotic courses were prescribed; of these courses only 15 (53.5%) had an indication documented and 15 (53.5%) had a review/stop date documented.

A monthly league table, coined ‘The Champions League’, was created. This named individuals who had correctly or incorrectly prescribed antibiotics, following identification in the monthly audit. It was published monthly and displayed in the doctors' office, on wards and circulated to all Consultants. After two published league tables, 19 antibiotic courses were prescribed. Indication was documented in 18 (94.7%) and 16 (84.2%) had the review date documented. This improvement has continued to the present day.

Prescribing standards appear to have improved with the use of this novel motivational tool. The competitive nature of surgical trainees has led to the Champions League becoming a talking point. Top placed doctors are rewarded with Premiership rugby tickets and those who consistently underperform are sensitively offered remedial instruction.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 29 - 29
1 Mar 2008
Kapoor V Theruvil B Edwards S Taylor G Clarke N Uglow M
Full Access

The majority of diaphyseal forearm fractures in children are treated by closed reduction and plaster immobilisation. There is a small subset of patients where operative treatment is indicated. Recent reports indicate that elastic intramedullary nailing (EIN) is gaining popularity over plate fixation. We report the results of EIN for diaphyseal fractures of the forearm in 44 children aged between 5 and 15 years during a three-year period. The indications were instability (26), redisplacement (14), and open fractures (4). Closed reduction and nailing was carried out in 18 cases. A single bone had to be opened in 16 cases and in 10 cases both bones were opened for achieving reduction. Out of the 39 both bone forearm fractures, 35 patients had stabilisation of both radius and ulna and in 4 cases only a single bone was nailed (Radius 3, Ulna 1).

Union was achieved in all the 44 cases at an average time of 7 weeks with one delayed union. All patients regained full flexion and extension of the elbow and wrist. Pronation was restricted by an average of 20° in 30% patients.

Complications were seen in 10 patients (20%). 4 patients had prominent metal work which required early removal. There was refracture in one case, which was treated by nail removal and re-fixation. Two patients developed post operative compartment syndrome requiring fasciotomy. EIN of the radius alone in a patient with fractures of both the bones of forearm, led to secondary displacement of the ulna. This resulted in ulnar malunion and a symptomatic distal radio-ulnar joint subluxation. This was successfully treated by ulnar osteotomy.

Compared to forearm plating EIN involves minimal scarring, easier removal and less risk of nerve damage. We therefore recommend EIN for the treatment of unstable middle and proximal third forearm fractures.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 308 - 308
1 Sep 2005
Dare C Edwards S Stranks G Hobby J
Full Access

Introduction and Aims: The management of diaphyseal tibial fractures remains controversial. This paper looks at the use of an innovative, unlocked, inflatable intra-medullary nail (Fixion, Disc-O-Tech). The study aim is to assess the performance of this nail relative to a traditional locked nail.

Method: This study compares a prospectively recruited cohort of patients treated with the fixion nail to a consecutive series of patients treated with the Russel Taylor locked nail prior to the introduction of the new device. All the fractures were classified using the AO system. Operating time and the x-ray screening time were recorded, along with any peri or post-operative complications, and need for secondary procedures. Follow-up x-rays were assessed for time to radiological union.

Results: Thirty-six patients were identified, 17 undergoing fixion tibial nailing and 19 having locked Russell Taylor nails. AO classification of fractures ranged from 42-A1 to 42-C3 and was similar in the two groups. In the Fixion group were 15 males and two females with an age range of 15 to 76 years. Two cases required secondary procedures. In the locked nail group were 19 cases, 16 males and three females. Eleven of the cases required secondary procedures, principally removal of locking screws for dynamisation of the nail in cases of delayed bone union and four patients had the nail removed.

The mean operating time for the fixion nail was 58 minutes and 89 minutes for the locked Russell Taylor nail, a statistically significant difference (p< 0.002, unpaired t-test). There was also a significant difference in the need for secondary procedures with at least one further procedure in 11/18 Russel Taylor nails and only 2/17 Fixion nails (p< 0.006, Fisher’s exact test). There was no significant difference in image intensifier screening time between the two groups. There was a trend to reduced time to bone union with the Fixion nail which did not reach statistical significance in this small cohort (p = 0.06), but may do so as a larger number of patients are studied.

Conclusions: Our results show that operative time was significantly less with the fixion nail, there were many fewer secondary procedures and all fractures went on to union. Our study demonstrates that an unlocked, inflatable nail compares favourably with a locked nail and should be considered in tibial diaphyseal fractures.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 127 - 127
1 Feb 2003
Kane T Edwards S Hodkinson S
Full Access

Background

Studies have investigated driver reaction time (DRT) following hip replacement, knee replacement and arthroscopy. This study tests the null hypothesis that there is no difference in DRT between patients after right ankle fracture and healthy controls.

Methods

Patients with right ankle fractures were recruited and DRT was measured using a simulator (time taken to achieve a brake pressure of 100 Newtons after a visual stimulus).

Inclusion criteria: drivers aged 17–70 years with right ankle fractures. Patients were tested when first out of plaster (T0), two, four and six weeks subsequently. DRT was compared to controls matched for age, sex and driving experience (paired T test). The percentage reaching a “safe” DRT (0.7 seconds) was determined.

Results

There were 25 patients: 18 conservatively and seven operatively treated fractures. The age range of patients was 19 to 69yrs (mean 41.4yrs), and of controls: 19 to 68yrs (mean 41.8yrs). Conservative group DRT was significantly slower than controls at T0 (p< 0.001) but not thereafter. Operative group DRT was significantly slower than controls at T0 (p< 0.003) and two weeks (p< 0.005) but not thereafter

Conclusion

Following right ankle fracture and removal of cast, DRT is initially prolonged. This study suggests a return to normality within two weeks after conservatively treated fractures and four weeks after operatively treated fractures.