This paper reports a series of comparative tests in-vitro that examined how lateral meniscectomy and meniscal allografting affected tibio-femoral joint contact pressures. 8 Cadaver knees (age range 81 – 98 years) were loaded in axial compression in an Instron materials testing machine up to 700N for 10 seconds and pressure maps obtained from the lateral compartment using Fuji Prescale film inserted below the meniscus. This was repeated after meniscectomy, then after meniscal allografting with fixation by a bone plug for the insertional ligaments, plus peripheral sutures. Finally, the pressure when the allograft was secured by peripheral sutures alone was measured.

Meniscectomy caused a significant increase in peak contact pressures (p=0.0002). Both of the reconstructive methods reduced the peak contact pressures significantly below that of the meniscectomised knee (p=0.0029 with bone block; p=0.0199 with sutures alone). A significant difference was not found between the peak contact pressures after the reconstructions and that of the intact knee (p=0.1721 with bone block; p=0.0910 with sutures alone). The peak pressures increased slightly when the allografts were converted from bone block to suture-only fixation (p=0.0349).

The principal finding was that both of the meniscal allograft insertion techniques reduced the peak contact pressure significantly below that of the meniscectomised knee, so that it did not then differ significantly from the peak contact pressure in the intact knee. When the two fixation methods were compared, the loss of the bone plug attachment caused a small increase in peak pressure.

This study suggests that meniscal allografting should have a chondroprotective effect and that there is a small advantage from adding bony fixation to suture fixation.

One hundred and sixty-two patients with a diagnosis of scapholunate instability underwent a modified Brunelli procedure over a 7 year period. One hundred and seventeen were assessed with the help of a questionnaire and, of these, 55 patients attended for clinical evaluation. The mean follow-up was 4 (1-8) years. There were 72 patients with dynamic scapholunate instability and 45 patients with static instability. The average age was 38 years. There were 50 males and 67 females. 77 (62%) patients had no to mild pain with a mean visual analogue score of 3.67 (SD=2.5)). The loss in the arc of flexion-extension was due to a reduced range of flexion (mean 31% loss), while 80% of extension was maintained, compared with the contralateral side. The grip strength on the operated side was reduced by 20% of the non-operated side. There was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) in the range of movement or the grip strength between the static and dynamic group or the claims and non-claims group. Ninety (79%) patients were satisfied with the result of the surgery (good to excellent) and 88% of the patients felt that they would have the same surgery again. We feel that these results compare favourably with the early results published from this unit and recommend this procedure for dynamic and static scapholunate instability