This is a multicentre, prospective assessment of a proportion of the overall orthopaedic trauma caseload of the UK. It investigates theatre capacity, cancellations, and time to surgery in a group of hospitals that is representative of the wider population. It identifies barriers to effective practice and will inform system improvements. Data capture was by collaborative approach. Patients undergoing procedures from 22 August 2022 and operated on before 31 October 2022 were included. Arm one captured weekly caseload and theatre capacity. Arm two concerned patient and injury demographics, and time to surgery for specific injury groups.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to describe services available to patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF) in England and Wales, with focus on variation between centres and areas for care improvement. This work used data freely available from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) facilities survey in 2021, which asked 21 questions about the care of patients with PPFFs, and nine relating to clinical decision-making around a hypothetical case.Aims
Methods
Patients with A1 and A2 trochanteric hip fractures represent a substantial proportion of trauma caseload, and national guidelines recommend that sliding hip screws (SHS) should be used for these injuries. Despite this, intramedullary nails (IMNs) are routinely implanted in many hospitals, at extra cost and with unproven patient outcome benefit. We have used data from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) to examine the use of SHS and IMN for A1 and A2 hip fractures at a national level, and to define the cost implications of management decisions that run counter to national guidelines. We used the NHFD to identify all operations for fixation of trochanteric fractures in England and Wales between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021. A uniform price band from each of three hip fracture implant manufacturers was used to set cost implications alongside variation in implant use.Aims
Methods
Understanding of open fracture management is skewed due to reliance on small-number lower limb, specialist unit reports and large, unfocused registry data collections. To address this, we carried out the Open Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study, and report the demographic details and the initial steps of care for patients admitted with open fractures in the UK. Any patient admitted to hospital with an open fracture between 1 June 2021 and 30 September 2021 was included, excluding phalanges and isolated hand injuries. Institutional information governance approval was obtained at the lead site and all data entered using Research Electronic Data Capture. Demographic details, injury, fracture classification, and patient dispersal were detailed.Aims
Methods
The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study was performed to provide clarity in open fracture management previously skewed by small, specialist centre studies and large, unfocused registry investigations. We report the current management metrics of open fractures across the UK. Patients admitted to hospital with an open fracture (excluding phalanges or isolated hand injuries) between 1 June 2021 and 30 September 2021 were included. Institutional information governance approval was obtained at the lead site and all data entered using Research Electronic Data Capture software. All domains of the British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Open Fracture Management were recorded.Aims
Method
The purpose of this study was to determine the weightbearing practice of operatively managed fragility fractures in the setting of publically funded health services in the UK and Ireland. The Fragility Fracture Postoperative Mobilisation (FFPOM) multicentre audit included all patients aged 60 years and older undergoing surgery for a fragility fracture of the lower limb between 1 January 2019 and 30 June 2019, and 1 February 2021 and 14 March 2021. Fractures arising from high-energy transfer trauma, patients with multiple injuries, and those associated with metastatic deposits or infection were excluded. We analyzed this patient cohort to determine adherence to the British Orthopaedic Association Standard, “all surgery in the frail patient should be performed to allow full weight-bearing for activities required for daily livingAims
Methods
To compare the early management and mortality of older patients
sustaining major orthopaedic trauma with that of a younger population
with similar injuries. The Trauma Audit Research Network database was reviewed to identify
eligible patients admitted between April 2012 and June 2015. Distribution
and severity of injury, interventions, comorbidity, critical care
episodes and mortality were recorded. The population was divided
into young (64 years or younger) and older (65 years and older) patients.Aims
Patients and Methods
The outcomes of 261 nerve injuries in 100 patients
were graded good in 173 cases (66%), fair in 70 (26.8%) and poor in
18 (6.9%) at the final review (median 28.4 months (1.3 to 64.2)).
The initial grades for the 42 sutures and graft were 11 good, 14
fair and 17 poor. After subsequent revision repairs in seven, neurolyses
in 11 and free vascularised fasciocutaneous flaps in 11, the final
grades were 15 good, 18 fair and nine poor. Pain was relieved in
30 of 36 patients by nerve repair, revision of repair or neurolysis,
and flaps when indicated. The difference in outcome between penetrating
missile wounds and those caused by explosions was not statistically
significant; in the latter group the onset of recovery from focal
conduction block was delayed (mean 4.7 months (2.5 to 10.2)
We describe 261 peripheral nerve injuries sustained
in war by 100 consecutive service men and women injured in Iraq
and Afghanistan. Their mean age was 26.5 years (18.1 to 42.6), the
median interval between injury and first review was 4.2 months (mean
8.4 months (0.36 to 48.49)) and median follow-up was 28.4 months
(mean 20.5 months (1.3 to 64.2)). The nerve lesions were predominantly
focal prolonged conduction block/neurapraxia in 116 (45%), axonotmesis
in 92 (35%) and neurotmesis in 53 (20%) and were evenly distributed
between the upper and the lower limbs. Explosions accounted for
164 (63%): 213 (82%) nerve injuries were associated with open wounds.
Two or more main nerves were injured in 70 patients. The ulnar,
common peroneal and tibial nerves were most commonly injured. In
69 patients there was a vascular injury, fracture, or both at the
level of the nerve lesion. Major tissue loss was present in 50 patients:
amputation of at least one limb was needed in 18. A total of 36 patients
continued in severe neuropathic pain. This paper outlines the methods used in the assessment of these
injuries and provides information about the depth and distribution
of the nerve lesions, their associated injuries and neuropathic
pain syndromes.
