header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 201 - 201
1 May 2011
Loveridge J Gardner R Barnett A Davis N Dunkley A
Full Access

Suturing of portals following arthroscopic shoulder surgery is the standard method of closure, but may be unnecessary. We carried out a randomised controlled trial to compare patients whose arthroscopic portals were closed by suturing and those that were covered by a simple dressing. We randomised 60 patients undergoing diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy, arthroscopic subacromial decompression and arthroscopic acromio-clavicular joint excision.

At 10 to 12 days following surgery, patients attended the GP surgery for a wound check and removal of sutures as required. At 3 weeks and 3 months every patient was reviewed by a designated, blinded, observer and the wounds assessed. The patients completed a questionnaire including visual analogue scores to determine their satisfaction with wound appearance and any complications such as infection.

At 3 weeks and 3 months no patients had needed antibiotics with no wound erythema or signs of infection. The number of dressings needed was comparable in both groups (p=0.73). The difference in the level of patient satisfaction was not statistically significant in either group (p=0.46). The wound cosmesis score was not statistically different in either group (p=0.66)

We conclude that both closure techniques were equivalent but the non-suture technique is cheaper with lower morbidity. From our study there is no need to suture shoulder arthroscopy portal wounds


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 49 - 49
1 Jan 2011
Loveridge J Gardner R Barnett A Davis N Dunkley A
Full Access

Suturing of portals following arthroscopic shoulder surgery may be unnecessary. We carried out a randomised controlled trial to compare patients whose arthroscopic portals were closed by suturing and those that weren’t. We randomised 60 patients undergoing diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy, arthroscopic subacromial decompression and arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint excision.

At 10 to 12 days following surgery patients attended the GP surgery for a wound check and removal of sutures as required. At 3 weeks and 3 months every patient was reviewed by a designated, blinded, observer and the wounds assessed. The patients completed a questionnaire including visual analogue scores to determine their satisfaction with wound appearance and any complications such as infection.

At 3 weeks and 3 months no patients had needed antibiotics with no wound erythema or signs of infection. The number of dressings needed was comparable in both groups. The level of patient satisfaction was not statistically different in either group. (T-test 0.91, SD 15.16) The wound cosmesis score was not statistically different in either group. (T-test 0.29, SD 6.66)

We conclude that both closure techniques were equivalent but the non-suture technique is cheaper with lower morbidity. From our study there is no need to suture shoulder arthroscopy portal wounds