One of the key factors responsible for altered kinematics and joint stability following contemporary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is resection of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Therefore, retaining the ACL is often considered to be the “holy grail” of TKA. However, ACL retention can present several technical challenges, and in some cases may not be viable due to an absent or non-functional ACL. Therefore, the goal of this research was to investigate whether substitution of ACL function through an anterior post mechanism could improve kinematic deficits of contemporary posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retaining (CR) implants. This was done using KneeSIM, a previously established dynamic simulation tool based on an Oxford-rig setup. Deep knee bend, chair-sit, stair-ascent and walking were simulated for a contemporary ACL sacrificing (CR) implant, two ACL retaining implants, and an ACL substituting and PCL retaining implant. The motion of the femoral condyles relative to the tibia was recorded for kinematic comparisons. Our results revealed that, like ACL retaining implants, the ACL substituting implant could also provide kinematic improvements over contemporary ACL sacrificing implants by reducing early posterior femoral shift and preventing paradoxical anterior sliding. Such ACL substituting implants may be a valuable addition to the armament of joint surgeons, allowing them to provide improved knee function even when ACL retention is not feasible. Further research is required to investigate this mechanism in vitro and in vivo to verify the results of the simulations, and to determine whether kinematic improvements translate into improved clinical outcomes.
Dual Mobility (DM) implants have gained popularity for the treatment and prevention of hip dislocation, with increased stability provided by a large diameter mobile liner. However, distal regions of the liner can impinge on soft-tissues like hip capsule and iliopsoas, leading to anterior hip pain. Additionally, soft-tissue impingement may trap the mobile liner, leading to excessive loading of the liner rim, from engagement with the femoral stem, and subsequent intra-prosthetic dislocation. The hypothesis of this study was that reducing the liner profile below the equator (contoured design) can mitigate soft-tissue impingement without compromising inner-head pull-out resistance and overall hip joint stability ( The interaction of conventional and contoured liners with anterior soft-tissues was evaluated in 10 cadaveric hips (5 specimens; 2 male, 3 female; age 65 ± 10 yrs; liner diameter 42–48mm) via visual observation and fluoroscopic imaging. A metal wire was sutured to the deep fibers of the iliopsoas tendon/muscle, and metal wires were embedded in the mobile liners for fluoroscopic visualization Resistance to inner-head pull-out was evaluated via Finite Element Analysis (FEA) by simulating a full cycle of insertion of the inner head into the mobile liner and subsequent pullout. The femoral head, acetabular shell, and stem were modeled as rigid, while the mobile liner was modeled as plastically deformable. Hip joint stability was evaluated by dynamic simulations in for two dislocation modes: (A) Posterior dislocation (at 90° hip flexion) with internal hip rotation; (B) Posterior dislocation (starting at 90° flexion) with combined hip flexion and adduction. A 44 mm diameter conventional and a 44 mm contoured liner were evaluated during these tests.Introduction
Methods
Mechanical tissue properties of some ligaments and tendons have been described in the literature. However, to our knowledge no data exists describing the tensile properties of the Iliopsoas tendon. The iliopsoas complex is in very close proximity to the hip joint running through the psoas notch from the inner side of the pelvis to the lesser trochanter on the posterior aspect of the proximal femur. The tendon muscle complex wraps around the anterior aspect of the femoral head. Hip joint intervention such as total hip arthroplasty (THA) can interfere with iliopsoas function and contact mechanics, and thereby play a major role in the clinically known condition of anterior hip pain. For computer simulations such as finite element analysis (FEA) precise knowledge of soft-tissue mechanical properties is crucial for accurate models and therefore, the goal of this study was to describe the iliopsoas tensile properties using uniaxial testing equipment. Ten iliopsoas tendons were harvested from five specimens (2 male, 3 female; 82.4 yrs ±7.4 yrs) and then carefully cleaned from any fat and muscle tissue. Two freeze clamps were fixed to each end of the tendon sample. The clamps were submerged in liquid nitrogen for 30 seconds to prevent tendon slip and attached to the test frame and load cell via carabiners allowing the tendon to rotate around its long axis. Width, thickness and initial gauge length of each tendon were measured before testing. The test protocol included 10 cycles of preconditioning between 6 N and 60 N at 0.4 mm/s, followed by continuous distraction at 0.4 mm/s until failure. For each tendon the linear stiffness was determined by fitting a straight line to the liner region on the force-displacement curve (INTRODUCTION
METHODS
Dual Mobility (DM) implants have gained popularity for the treatment and prevention of hip dislocation, with increased stability provided by a large diameter mobile insert. However, distal regions of the insert may impinge on soft tissues like the iliopsoas, leading to groin pain. Additionally, soft-tissue impingement may trap the mobile insert, leading to excessive loading of the insert rim from engagement with the femoral neck and subsequent intra-prosthetic dislocation. To address this, an Anatomically Contoured Dual Mobility (ACDM) insert with a soft-tissue friendly distal geometry was developed Fluoroscopic imaging was used to evaluate soft-tissue interaction with ACDM and conventional DM inserts in four cadaver hips (Introduction
Methods
In Cruciate Retaining (CR) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), the Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) is preserved but the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) is sacrificed. In contemporary CR implants, failure to substitute for ACL function causes abnormal knee motion, with the femur being located excessively posterior on the tibia in full extension ( The kinematics of an ACL-preserving implant, the ASCR implant, and a contemporary CR implant during deep knee bend was simulated using LifeMOD KneeSIM software (Introduction
Methods
Femoral head diameter has a major influence on stability and dislocation resistance of the hip joint after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Dual Mobility (DM) implants can also reduce the risk of dislocation due the large diameter mobile liner which forms the femoroacetbular articulation. However, recent studies have shown that large head prostheses can directly impinge against native soft tissues, particularly the iliopsoas, leading to anterior hip pain. Dual mobility systems have emerged as a revision option in the treatment of failed metal on metal devices because of the high incidence of post revision instability secondary to abductor loss and need for capsulectomy. We hypothesized that an Anatomically Contoured Dual Mobility (ACDM) liner could provide joint stability while better accommodating the soft tissues surrounding the hip joint. The dislocation resistance of a 44 mm ACDM implant was compared to that of a 44 mm conventional DM liner. Both implants consisted of a 28 mm inner small diameter head and the liner was abducted to be in the worst case position for dislocation (Fig. 1). The ACDM liner was based on a 44 mm sphere with smaller radii used to contour the peripheral region below the equator of the liner. MSC Adams was used for dynamic simulations based on two previously described dislocation modes: (A) Posterior dislocation (at 90° hip flexion) with internal rotation of the hip and a posterosuperior directed joint force; (B) Posterior dislocation (starting at 90° flexion) with combined hip flexion and adduction and a posteromedial force direction (Fig. 2). Impingement-free motion (motion without neck impingement against the acetabular cup) and jump distance (head separation from acetabulum at dislocation) were measured for each implant. The acetabular cup was placed at 42.5° abduction and 19.7° anteversion, while the femoral component was anteverted by 9.75° based on published data.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
Large diameter femoral heads have been used successfully to prevent dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). However, recent studies show that the peripheral region of contemporary femoral heads can directly impinge against the native soft-tissues, particularly the iliopsoas, leading to activity limiting anterior hip pain. This is because the spherical articular surface of contemporary prosthesis overhangs beyond that of the native anatomy (Fig. 1). The goal of this research was to develop an anatomically shaped, soft-tissue friendly large diameter femoral head that retains the benefits of contemporary implants. Various Anatomically Contoured femoral Head (ACH) designs were constructed, wherein the articular surface extending from the pole to a theta (θ) angle, matched that of contemporary implants (Fig. 2). However, the articular surface in the peripheral region was moved inward towards the femoral head center, thereby reducing material that could impinge on the soft-tissues (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). Finite element analysis was used to determine the femoroacetabular contact area under peak in vivo loads during different activities. Dynamic simulations were used to determine jump distance prior to posterior dislocation under different dislocation modes. Published data was used to compare the implant articular geometry to native anatomy (Fig. 3). These analyses were used to optimize the soft-tissue relief, while retaining the load bearing contact area, and the dislocation resistance of conventional implants.Introduction:
Methods:
Dual Mobility (DM) hip implants have gained popularity for the treatment and preventions of instability. In DM implants a large diameter mobile insert matches the native femoral head size. However, studies have shown that the peripheral regions of such large diameter implants overhang beyond the native anatomy and can directly impinge against nearby soft tissues, especially the iliopsoas, leading to groin pain (Fig. 1). Soft-tissue impingement can also trap the mobile DM insert, leading to damage of its peripheral rim, which secures the small diameter inner head (Fig. 2). The goal of this research was to develop an anatomically contoured soft-tissue friendly DM insert. Various Anatomically Contoured Dual Mobility (ACDM) insert designs were constructed, wherein the outer articular surface extending from the pole to a theta (θ) angle, matched that of contemporary implants (Fig. 3). However, the articular surface in the peripheral region was moved inward towards the center, thereby reducing implant volume that could impinge on the soft tissue (Fig. 1 and Fig. 3). Finite element analyses were used to determine the insert-acetabular contact area under peak in vivo loads during different activities. Finite element analysis was also used to determine resistance to extraction of the inner head. Published data was used to compare the implant articular geometry to native anatomy. These analyses were used optimize the soft-tissue relief, while matching the load bearing contact area and the resistance to extraction of the inner head in contemporary implants.Introduction:
Methods:
Large diameter femoral heads provide increased range-of-motion and reduced dislocation rates compared to smaller diameter femoral heads. However, several recent studies have reported that contemporary large head prostheses can directly impinge against the local soft tissues leading to anterior hip pain. To address this we developed a novel Anatomically Contoured large diameter femoral Head (ACH) that maintains the profile of a large diameter femoral head over a hemispherical portion and then contours inward the distal profile of the head for soft-tissue relief. We hypothesized that the distal contouring of the ACH articular surface would not affect contact area. The impact of component placement, femoral head to acetabular liner radial clearance, and joint loading during different activities was investigated. A finite element model was used to assess the femoroacetabular contact area of a 36 mm diameter conventional head and a 36 mm ACH (Fig. 1). It included a rigid acetabular shell, plastically deformable UHMWPE acetabular liner, rigid femoral head and rigid femoral stem. The femoral stem was placed at 0°, 10° and 20° of anteversion. The acetabular shell and liner were placed in 20°, 40° and 60° of abduction and 0°, 20° and 40° of anteversion. The femoral head to acetabular liner radial clearances modeled were 0.06 mm, 0.13 mm and 0.5 mm. Three loading cases corresponding to peak in vivo loads during walking, chair sit and deep-knee bend were analyzed (Fig. 2). This allowed a range of component positions and maximum joint loads to be studied.Introduction
Methods
Dual mobility (DM) implants provide increased stability and range-of-motion through the use of a large diameter mobile liner articulating against an acetabular shell. However, recent studies have reported that such contemporary large head prostheses can directly impinge against the local soft tissues leading to anterior hip pain. To address this drawback, a novel Anatomically Contoured Dual Mobility (ACDM) liner was developed that maintains the outer spherical geometry over an approximately hemispherical portion and then contours inward the distal profile of the DM liner for soft-tissue relief. The extent of the inner profile encapsulating the small diameter head is increased to provide more coverage of the head and maintain the inner head pullout force. We hypothesized that the ACDM liner for soft-tissue relief would not affect retention of the small diameter inner head or liner-acetabular load-bearing contact area. A finite element model to evaluate head retention and contact mechanics was created with a rigid acetabular shell, a plastically deformable UHMWPE DM liner, a rigid femoral head and a rigid femoral stem. For the head retention analysis, the extent of head coverage (Fig. 1) was optimized to match the inner head pullout force of a conventional DM liner. Contact mechanics of a conventional DM and ACDM liner were analyzed at the maximum joint load of three activities: gait, deep-knee bend and chair sit. One set of simulations was completed with the mobile liner and head axes aligned and another with the axes mal-aligned so that the mobile liner rim was adjacent to the femoral stem neck and the potential area of contact was away from the mobile liner apex. This allowed a broader range of potential contact to be assessed including what was determined to be a worst-case alignment.Introduction
Methods
Femoral head diameter has a major influence on stability and dislocation resistance after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Although routine use of large heads is common, several recent studies have shown that contemporary large head prostheses can directly impinge against native soft tissues, particularly the iliopsoas which wraps around the femoral head, leading to refractory anterior hip pain. To address this, we developed a novel Anatomically Contoured large diameter femoral Head (ACH). We hypothesized that anatomical contouring of the ACH implant for soft tissue relief would not compromise dislocation resistance, and the ACH implant would provide increased stability compared to small heads. In this study the dislocation resistance of a 36 mm ACH was compared to that of 28 mm and 36 mm contemporary heads. The ACH implant was based on a 36 mm sphere with smaller radii used to contour the peripheral region below the equator of the head. MSC Adams was used for dynamic simulations based on two previously described dislocation modes: (A) Posterior dislocation (at 90° hip flexion) with internal rotation of the hip and a posterosuperior directed joint force; (B) posterior dislocation (starting at 90° flexion) with combined hip flexion and adduction and a posteromedial force direction (Fig. 1). Impingement-free motion (motion without neck impingement against the acetabular liner) and jump distance (head separation from acetabulum prior to dislocation) were measured to evaluate the dislocation risk of each implant. The acetabular cup was placed at 42.5° abduction and 19.7° anteversion, while the femoral component was anteverted by 9.75° based on published data.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
