Because of concerns regarding excessive wear and short-term failures attributed to the metal-on-metal bearings, the use of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MOMHRA) has been greatly reduced since 2008, despite great mid-term results for well-designed implants and in certain patient populations. The true cause of excessive wear was then unknown. Therefore, identification of true risk factors for the procedure became paramount to refine indications and improve survivorship outcomes. Over the last 10 years, a systematic search of the US national library of Medicine and National institutes of health with the key words “metal-on-metal” and hip resurfacing” was conducted and returned 2186 items. Of these items, 862 were deemed relevant to our research purposes and entered in our center's reference database from which this review was performed.Introduction
Methods
It has been suggested that metal ion levels are indicative of 182 patients (73 females and 109 males)with a unilateral Conserve Plus (WMT, TN USA) MMHRA and had who had provided blood for metal ion analysis data from December 2000 to June 2011 were retrospectively studied. Only measurements made more than 12 months after surgery were included in order to exclude hips that had yet to reach steady-state wear. For patients with multiple draws, the most recent qualifying draw was used. Activity level was assessed by the UCLA activity score. The mean age was 51.5 years (20.0 to 77.5 years). The mean follow-up time for the last blood draw was 70 months (range, 12 to 165). Serum cobalt (CoS) and chromium (CrS) levels were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry in a specialized trace element lab. Using acetabular abduction and anteversion measured by EBRA, component size, and reported coverage angle of the acetabular component, the CPR distance was calculated as previously described. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify significant relationships between high metal ion levels (7 μg/L or greater) and gender, activity and CPR distance. The median CoS level for the entire cohort was 1.13 μg/L (range, 0.15 to 175.30), and the median CrS level was 1.49 μg/L (range, 0.06 to 88.70). The average CPR distance was 13.8 mm (range, 3.2 to 22.1). There was a significant association between low CPR values and CoS and CrS. There was a 37-fold increase in the risk of CoS >7μg/L (p=0.005) and 11-fold increase in the risk of CrS > 7μg/L (p=0.003) when CPR distance was 10 mm or less. No associations were shown for gender and UCLA activity scores. CPR distance was found to be a reliable predictor of ion levels > 7μg/L and appears to be a useful indicator to evaluate the multi-factorial process of edge-loading and wear. Patients with a low CPR distance should be monitored for increased metal ion levels.