header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 17 - 17
1 Nov 2018
Dalgarno K Benning M Partridge S Tulah A Ahmed S Dickinson A Genever P Pearson R Feichtinger G Loughlin J Ferreira-Duarte A
Full Access

This paper reports on a proof of concept project funded by the UK National Council for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), with the aim of developing an in vitro model to recapitulate the human osteoarthritic joint, based on a multiple human cell type co-culture system, for research and drug development in OA. The targets were: (i) the development of a cell culture platform that could produce a mixed stable cell culture of cell types that represent the key components of the human joint: synoviocytes – type I and type II; osteoblasts; osteoclasts; chondrocytes/cartilage or cartilage-like matrix; adipocytes; and immune cells. (ii) demonstration of cell phenotype stability and viability for at least 72 hours. In order to establish the cell culture platform we have developed an eight-channel cell printer, capable of accurately and reliably printing the required cell types to create osteochondral and synovial cell types within a transwell system. Two different sets of cells have been developed and processed using the cell printer: a set based on using an immortalised hTERT MSC line to create osteoblasts, chondrocytes and adipocytes, with commercial cells lines providing the other cell types, and a set obtained from tissue excised during orthopaedic surgery. This gives both a repeatable set of cells with which to undertake mode of action studies, and a bank of cell sets which will be representative of different stages of osteoarthritis. The co-cultures have been immunohistochemically assessed in order to demonstrate maintenance of phenotype.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 2 | Pages 152 - 159
1 Feb 2016
Corbacho B Duarte A Keding A Handoll H Chuang LH Torgerson D Brealey S Jefferson L Hewitt C Rangan A

Aims

A pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (PROFHER) was conducted in United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) hospitals to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of surgery compared with non-surgical treatment for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus involving the surgical neck in adults.

Methods

A cost utility analysis from the NHS perspective was performed. Differences between surgical and non-surgical treatment groups in costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) at two years were used to derive an estimate of the cost effectiveness of surgery using regression methods.