Conservative treatment of minimally displaced distal radius fractures (DFR) remains controversial. Circumferential casting (CC) in the acute setting is believed to supply superior support compared to splinting, but is generally cautioned due to the limited capacity of a cast to accommodate ongoing limb swelling possibly leading to complications. However, there is no conclusive data on which to base these beliefs. Moreover, the appropriate management of cast complications while minimizing risk to fracture integrity remains unclear. This retrospective study of distal radius fractures treated conservatively with circumferential cast in the acute setting aims to: A. Determine demographic, fracture dependant or management risk factors for CC complications. B. Determine the natural history for both patients with CC and those with CC necessitating cast modification. Hospital records and radiographic data of 316 patients with DRFs treated with CC at a tertiary-care university hospital between the years 2006 to 2009 were reviewed. Our primary outcome was to access risk factors for cast complications including swelling, pressure sores, neuropathies and loss of cast immobilization. Our secondary outcome accessed reduction stability in patients undergoing cast re-manipulation.Purpose
Method
