Septic complications of long bone fracture are still a significant clinical problem. Although inflammatory process after intramedullary nailing is a rare complication, its treatment is complex. The aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of the treatment of septic complications of the long bone union with use of Reamer–Irrigator–Aspirator (RIA) technique and intramedullary antibiotic-coated PMMA nailing. An analysis of the effectiveness of treatment of 49 patients with septic non-union of long bones (12 femur, 37 tibia), in which the RIA method was applied with antibiotic cement impregnated intramedullary nailing. Treatment consisted of reaming of long bone canal using the RIA technique and the intramedullary cement coated nail with the targeted antibiotic. Treatment required second stage with nail exchange and PMMA removal after 6 weeks to prevent the resitant strains selection. In a group of patients treated with use of above-mentioned method the remission of inflammatory process was achieved in all cases. 32 (67%) patients developed bone union, 24 patients with tibial and 8 patients with femoral septic bone union disorders. The average duration of bone union obtainment with intramedullary nailing was 37 weeks. The most common inconveniences that occurred during treatment was prolonged wound discharge and pain.
Inflammatory complications of fractures in our material involved extensive injuries, usually high-energetic. Stabilization with intramedullary locked nail coated with antibiotic cement after debridement with RIA method is a convincing treatment. An essential element of biological bone union is to provide a good cover of the bone tissue with a soft tissue envelope and sequestrectomy. The success of the treatment of infected pseudoarthrosis may be obtained under condition of: radical removal of inflammation tissue, convincing biomechanical dynamized stabilization and antibiotic therapy.
The aim of the study was to assess an effectiveness of S53P4 bioglass in reconstruction of postinflammatory bone loss. We have also evaluated wound healing after the surgical dead space management with use of the bioglass. A group of 7 patients with bone loss due to active osteomyelitis and with purulent fistula treated with use of S53P4 bioglass is presented in the paper. All the treated patients were male with mean of age 40,5 years. Mean time of an active inflammatory process with purulent discharge from the wound prior the surgery was 587 weeks. Wound healing pattern with an X-ray evaluation of reconstructed void was performed in postoperative period as well as in 1, 3, 6 and 12 mounth follow-up. In 6 out of 7 cases we did not observed any signs of infection recurrence in 1-year follow-up. Starting from 1-month follow-up inflammatory serum markers remained in their reference values. In all the successfully treated cases wound healing was assessed by two independent surgeons as excellent or good. Starting from 3-month follow-up we have observed gradual blurring of granular bioglass structure on an X-ray scans. In 1 complicated case we observed recurrence of septic inflammatory process with purulent fistula that required revision procedure with removal of the bioglass and extended debridement of inflammatory focus. In this case we have faced posttraumatic malunion of the femur that substantially complicated surgical access to the inflammatory focus during primary procedure. S53P4 bioactive glass is an effective solution in reconstruction of postinflammatory bone loss. Properties of this biomaterial efficiently prevent from focal infection recurrence by inhibiting of bacterial bone growth and reduction of dead space. The product requires however meticulous debridement and the access to a vital bone as a source of osteoblast cells. Underestimation of surgical debridement will likely result in reopening of the fistula due to reinfection. The study group requires further evaluation.
