Currently 180 days is the target maximum wait time set by all Canadian provinces for elective joint replacement surgery. In Nova Scotia however, only 34% of Total Knee Arthroplasties (TKA) and 51% of Total Hip Arthroplasties (THA) met this benchmark in 2017. Surgery performed later in the natural history of disease is shown to have significant impact on pain, function and Health related Quality of Life at the time of surgery and potentially affect post-operative outcomes. The aim of this study is to describe the association between wait time and acute hospital Length of Stay (LOS) during elective hip and knee arthroplasty in province of Nova Scotia. Secondarily we aim to describe risk factors associated with variations in LOS.

Data from Patient Access Registry Nova Scotia (PAR-NS) was linked to the hospital Discharge Access Database (DAD) for primary hip and knee arthroplasty spanning 2009 to 2017. There were 23,727 DAD observations and 21,329 PARNS observations identified. Observations were excluded based on missing variables, missing linkages, revision status and emergency cases. Percentage difference in LOS, risk factors and outcomes were analyzed using Poisson regression for those waiting more than 180 days compared to those waiting equal or less than 180 days.

For primary TKA, 11,833 observations were identified with mean age of 66 years, mean wait time of 348 days and mean LOS of 3.6 days. After adjusting for controls, patients waiting more than 180 days for elective TKA have a 2.5% longer acute care LOS (p < 0.028). Risk factors identified for prolonged LOS are advanced age, female gender, higher surgical priority indicator, required blood transfusion, dementia, peptic ulcer disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, malignancy, ischemic heart disease and diabetes. Factors associated with decreased LOS are surgical year, use of local anesthetic, peripheral location of hospital and admission to hospital from home.

For primary THA, 6626 observations were identified with mean age of 66 years, mean wait time of 267 days and mean LOS of 4 days. Patients waiting more than 180 days for THA did not show a statistically significant association with LOS. Risk factors and protective factors are the same with exception of CVD and use of local anesthetic.

Our findings suggest a positive and statistically significant association for patients waiting more than 180 days for TKA and longer acute care LOS. Longer LOS may be due to deteriorating health status while placed on a surgical waitlist and may represent a delayed and indirect cost to the patient and the healthcare system. Ultimately with projected increase in demand for elective joint replacement surgeries, our findings are aimed to inform physicians and policy makers in management of surgical waitlist efficiency and cost effectiveness.

For any reader inquiries, please contact shahriar-s@hotmail.com

The purpose of this study was to determine the benefit and risk of NSAID-based prophylaxis for ectopic bone formation amongst patients undergoing total hip replacement (or revision) surgery.

A double-blind randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial, stratified by treatment site and surgery (primary or revision), was conducted in 20 orthopaedic surgery centres in Australia and New Zealand. 902 patients, undergoing elective primary or revision total hip replacement surgery, were randomly allocated to 14 days treatment with ibuprofen (1200mg daily) or matching placebo commenced within 24 hours of surgery. Patients were only excluded if there was, in the opinion of the responsible physician, a definite indication or contra-indication for treatment with an NSAID during the 14 day study treatment period. Outcomes were assessed six to 12 months after surgery and included changes in self-reported hip pain and physical function (WOMAC), physical performance measures and radiographic evidence of ectopic bone formation.

There was only a 6% loss to follow-up for self-report measures and a 12% loss to follow-up for radiographs. Six to twelve months after surgery, there were no significant differences between the ibuprofen and placebo groups for improvements in hip pain (mean difference, 95% confidence interval: −0.1, −0.4 to 0.2, p=0.6) or physical function (−0.1, −0.4 to 0.2, p=0.5), despite a much reduced risk of ectopic bone formation (relative risk 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 0.83) associated with ibuprofen. There was a significantly increased risk of major bleeding complications during the admission period (2.09, 1.00 to 4.39)

These data, from the largest-ever trial of prophylaxis against ectopic bone formation, do not support the use of routine NSAIDs-based prophylaxis for patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery.

Two cases of bilateral slipping of the upper femoral epiphysis in boys with end-stage renal failure due to megacystis and mega-ureter with severe renal osteodystrophy are reported. In one patient the lesion emerged after a dystonic reaction to drugs and in the other after bilateral nephro-ureterectomy. Neither showed marked elevation of growth hormone levels, but both had evidence of renal rickets with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. Both had a satisfactory response to bilateral internal fixation. The complication should be borne in mind in all young patients with renal osteodystrophy.