header advert
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_5 | Pages 14 - 14
1 Apr 2022
Dorman S Fernandes J
Full Access

Introduction

Acquired chronic radial head (RH) dislocations present a significant surgical challenge. Co-existing deformity, length discrepancy and RH dysplasia, in multiply operated patients often preclude acute correction. This study reports the clinical and radiological outcomes in children, treated with circular frames for gradual RH reduction.

Materials and Methods

Patient cohort from a prospective database was reviewed to identity all circular frames for RH dislocations between 2000–2021. Patient demographics, clinical range and radiographic parameters were recorded.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 123 - 123
1 May 2016
Dorman S Choudhry M Dhadwal A Pearson K Waseem M
Full Access

Introduction

The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming increasingly common in the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy. Standard RSA technique involves medialising the centre of rotation (COR) maximising the deltoid lever arm and compensating for rotator cuff deficiency. However reported complications include scapular notching, prosthetic loosening and loss of shoulder contour. As a result the use of Bony Increased Offset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) has been gaining in popularity. The BIO-RSA is reported to avoid these complications by lateralising the COR using a modified base plate, longer central post and augmentation with cancellous bone graft harvested from the patients humeral head.

Objectives

This study aims to compare the outcome in terms of analgesic effect, function and satisfaction, in patients treated with standard RSA and BIO-RSA.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 124 - 124
1 May 2016
Dorman S Dhadwal A Pearson K Waseem M
Full Access

Introduction

The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming increasingly common in the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy. In recent years indications for use have expanded to include elderly patients in whom either internal fixation is not possible due to fracture configuration, poor bone quality, or presence of a rotator cuff deficiency. There is however relatively little evidence to support its use in these circumstances.

Objective

This study aims to assess the viability of RSA as a salvage procedure in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures or irreducible dislocations, quantified in terms of functional outcome, complication rates and patient reported satisfaction.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 25 - 25
1 Jul 2014
Dorman S Maheshwari R George H Davies R James L
Full Access

We report our early experience with distracting external fixation used to offload the hip after avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head secondary to severe slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE).

A case series of five patients treated in a tertiary centre is reported. Electronic case records and radiographs were reviewed. Data recorded included demographics, initial presentation, timing of head collapse, timing and duration of distraction and outcome including referral to adult arthoplasty services.

Mean age at presentation was 12 years (range 12–15). 4 were females. Initial treatment in 4 cases was a delayed cuneiform osteotomy and pinning, one patient underwent serendipitous reduction and percutaneous pinning. Mean duration to initial surgery was 10 days (range 5–16). All patients had femoral head collapse at a mean of 148 days from time of presentation. 2 patients required backing out of screws due to intra-articular protrusion. All patients underwent distraction at a mean 193 days from presentation. Average distraction achieved was 10 mm and duration of application was 125 days (range 91–139)

All patients experienced improvement or resolution of pain but persistence of poor function, characterised by fixed adduction and limb length discrepancy. 3 patients were referred to adult arthroplasty services.

This may be an effective treatment option for pain associated with AVN post SUFE. However, in our experience normal anatomy and function of the hip is not restored if performed after collapse of the femoral head. Consideration should be given to application of the distractor either at the time of initial fixation or prior to femoral head collapse. Authors believe that timing of the application of the distractor is critical for a successful outcome and recommend a prospective study with large numbers.