To investigate the proprioceptive function of patients with an ACL rupture before and after reconstruction and correlate these findings with ligament laxity testing and clinical outcome measures. Fifty patients with an ACL rupture and 50 normal controls were recruited to the study. The Biodex Balance SD System was used to assess knee proprioception. This equipment measures proprioceptive function using an electronic platform. The balance of the subject is computed using stabilometry and an Overall Stability Index (OSI) is produced. A lower score reflects better proprioception. Knee stability was assessed clinically and with the Rolimeter knee arthrometer in all subjects. Participants were evaluated using the Tegner, Lysholm, Cincinnati and IKDC scoring systems. In the ACL group, 34 patients underwent ACL reconstruction and returned for their follow-up review 3 months post-operatively. The proprioceptive function of the injured knee of the ACL group (mean OSI 0.70) was significantly poorer compared to that of their uninjured knee (mean OSI 0.46, p<0.001, 95%CI 0.14, 0.34) and to the Normal Control group (mean OSI 0.49, p=0.01, 95%CI 0.05, 0.38). There was a significant improvement in proprioception of the injured knee following ACL reconstruction (mean OSI 0.47, p=0.003, 95%CI 0.10, 0.42). A significant correlation was found between pre-operative proprioception measurements and all the pre-operative knee outcome scores, however this correlation was not found post-operatively. No correlation was found between ligament laxity testing and either proprioception measurements or knee outcome scores.Purpose of Study
Summary of Methods and Results
We retrospectively studied the major complications occurring after one- and two-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR). Between 1999 and 2008, 911 patients underwent 1150 UKRs through a minimally invasive approach in our unit. Of these, 159 patients (318 UKRs) had one-stage and 80 patients (160 UKRs) had two-stage bilateral UKRs. The bilateral UKR groups were comparable in age and American Society of Anaesthesiology grade, but more women were in the two-stage group (p = 0.019). Mechanical thromboprophylaxis was used in all cases. Major complications were recorded as death, pulmonary embolus, proximal deep-vein thrombosis and adverse cardiac events within 30 days of surgery. No statistical differences between the groups were found regarding the operating surgeon, the tourniquet time or minor complications except for distal deep-vein thrombosis. The anaesthetic times were longer for the two-stage group (p = 0.0001). Major complications were seen in 13 patients (8.2%) with one-stage operations but none were encountered in the two-stage group (p = 0.005). Distal deep-vein thrombosis was more frequent in the two-stage group (p = 0.036). Because of the significantly higher risk of major complications associated with one-stage bilateral UKR we advocate caution before undertaking such a procedure.
