Assessment of skeletal age is important in children’s
orthopaedics. We compared two simplified methods used in the assessment
of skeletal age. Both methods have been described previously with
one based on the appearance of the epiphysis at the olecranon and
the other on the digital epiphyses. We also investigated the influence
of assessor experience on applying these two methods. Our investigation was based on the anteroposterior left hand
and lateral elbow radiographs of 44 boys (mean: 14.4; 12.4 to 16.1
) and 78 girls (mean: 13.0; 11.1 to14.9) obtained during the pubertal
growth spurt. A total of nine observers examined the radiographs
with the observers assigned to three groups based on their experience (experienced,
intermediate and novice). These raters were required to determined
skeletal ages twice at six-week intervals. The correlation between
the two methods was determined per assessment and per observer groups. Interclass
correlation coefficients (ICC) evaluated the reproducibility of
the two methods. The overall correlation between the two methods was r = 0.83
for boys and r = 0.84 for girls. The correlation was equal between
first and second assessment, and between the observer groups (r ≥ 0.82).
There was an equally strong ICC for the assessment effect (ICC ≤ 0.4%)
and observer effect (ICC ≤ 3%) for each method. There was no significant
(p <
0.05) difference between the levels of experience. The two methods are equally reliable in assessing skeletal maturity.
The olecranon method offers detailed information during the pubertal
growth spurt, while the digital method is as accurate but less detailed,
making it more useful after the pubertal growth spurt once the olecranon
has ossified. Cite this article:
This study is a retrospective monocentric analysis of changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment after in situ fusion of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. In situ fusion is a safety procedure with good functionnal outcome, but the consequences on the spinopelvic sagittal balance remains unclear. The aim is to evaluate the adaptative changes in the sagittal balance after such treatment. This is an analysis of 22 patients (mean age 13,5 years) with an average follow-up of 5,2 years (range 1–11 years). This study includes 6 grade II spondylolisthesis, 7 grade III and 9 grade IV. 13 patients were operated with a non instrumented posterolateral arthrodesis and 9 with a circumferential in situ fusion. Among the 13 grade II and III spondylolisthesis, 12 had a posterolateral arthrodesis and only 1 had a circumferential fusion. As for the grade IV spondylolisthesis 8 out of 9 had a circumferential arthrodesis and only 1 had a posterolateral fusion. Before and after surgery, all patients had lateral standing radiographs of the spine and pelvis. Different parameters were evaluated before surgery: pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, T9 sagittal tilt, L5 incidence, L5 slope and L5 tilt. After surgery, the pelvic parameters were not evaluated because of the difficulty to visualise the upper part of S1 after arthrodesis. The discs were evaluated by MRI. The functionnal outcome was evaluated with the Oswestry score. A global evaluation including all the patients doesn’t show any influence of the surgery on the sagittal alignment. But when evaluating the datas after classifying the patients in function of the severity of the spondylolisthesis, some differences raise. On one side, the patients with grade II and III spondylolisthesis keep a normal T9 sagittal tilt while slightly increasing lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis. On the other side, the patients with grade IV spondylolisthesis operated with a circumferential in situ fusion worsen the T9 sagittal tilt, increase the L5 incidence, decrease their lombar lordosis (L4/L5 discal kyphosis) and thoracic kyphosis. To conclude, we can say that patients with grade II and III spondylolisthesis have good functionnal outcome and keep a balanced spine. Patients with grade IV have a good clinical outcome as well but keep worsening their sagittal balance despite the circumferential in situ fusion. An unbalanced sagittal alignment might theorically compromise the long term clinical results, but the radiological outcome doesn’t seem to be linked to the functionnal outcome. A long term follow-up has to be done in order to evaluate the outcome of these unbalanced spines and compare it to the functionnal and radiological results obtained with reduced high grade spondylolisthesis.
There are many established database for estimating fetal femoral length ultrasonagraphically. There is little data however on radiological measurements of fetal femoral lengths. The aim of our study was to introduce radiologically measured fetal femoral lengths in order to improve our understanding of normal fetal femoral growth.
Using the standard growth curve there was a strong correlation between our radiological measurements and previously published ultrasonographic measurements (R2= 0.9492) The femoral growth velocity curve demonstrated a rapid growth acceleration phase peaking at 12 cm/annum at 16 weeks, followed by a rapid deceleration phase reducing to a growth rate of 5 cm/annum at birth. The growth remaining was calculated for each week. At 24 weeks the growth achieved is 10% thus giving a multiplying factor of 10. At birth the growth achieved is 20% giving a multiplying factor of 5.
The five cases of primary ischemia with absent pulse and a white hand were managed by emergency reduction followed by exploratory surgery and vascular repair which restored the radial pulse, excepting one case which required anterior fasciotomy.
Material and method: Among a series of 485 hips with LPCd, 148 (30.5%) with massive involvement were identified. Ninety-six (64.9%)severe forms were analyzed at the end of growth. Magnetic resonance imaging, scintigraphy and arteriography were used to better assess the femoral head and identify hips at risk. These hips were treated surgically: Salter osteotomy (SA), triple pelvis osteotomy (TO), or varus osteotomy (VA). Three groups of infants were identified according to age at diagnosis of LPCd: less than 6 years, 6–9 years, more than 9 years. Outcome was considered good (Stulberg 1 and 2, Mose good), fair (Stulberg 3, Mose fair), or poor (Stulberg 4 and 5, Mose poor).
Children presenting with Perthes’ disease before their sixth birthday are considered to have a good prognosis. We describe 166 hips in children in this age group. The mean age at onset of the disease was 44 months (22 to 72). Mild forms (Catterall I and II) were treated conservatively and severe forms (Catterall III and IV) either conservatively or operatively. The aim of the former treatment was to restrict weight-bearing. Operative treatment consisted of innominate osteotomy and was indicated by a Conway type-B appearance on the bone scan. All the patients were followed to skeletal maturity with a mean follow-up of 11 years (8 to 15). The end results were evaluated radiologically using the classifications of Stulberg and Mose. A total of 50 hips were Catterall grade-I or grade-II, 65 Catterall grade-III and 51 Catterall grade-IV. All hips with mild disease had a good result at skeletal maturity. Of the hips with severe disease 78 (67.3%) had good (Stulberg I and II), 26 (22.4%) fair (Stulberg III) and 12 (10.3%) poor results (Stulberg IV and V). Of the Catterall grade-III hips 38 were treated conservatively of which 31 (81.6%) had a good result, six (15.8%) a fair and one (2.6%) a poor result. Operative treatment was carried out on 27 Catterall grade-III hips, of which 21 (77.8%) had a good, four (14.8%) a fair and two (7.4%) a poor result. By comparison conservative treatment of 19 Catterall grade-IV hips led to ten (52.7%) good, seven (36.8%) fair and two (10.5%) poor results. Operative treatment was carried out on 32 Catterall grade-IV hips, of which 16 (50.0%) had a good, nine (28.1%) a fair and seven (21.9%) a poor result. We confirm that the prognosis in Perthes’ disease is generally good when the age at onset is less than six years. In severe disease there is no significant difference in outcome after conservative or operative treatment (p >
0.05). Catterall grade-III hips had a better outcome according to the Stulberg and Mose criteria than Catterall grade-IV hips, regardless of the method of treatment.
Poor results increase in older patients. After Orthopaedic treatment 60% of hips in children with LPC Disease appearing before the age of 6 find again its sphericity (Stulberg 1 or 2). About 30 % of hips in children with LCP Disease appearing between 6 and 9 years of age became “normal” (Stulberg 1 or 2) at the end of growth/Only 1 hip out of 10, in the oldest group of children (over 9 years), became spherical at the end of growth. Surgery increases the percentage of good results in all groups of patients.