At the end of 2018, the NZ Joint Registry introduced a “Surgeon Outlier” policy, whereby each year, if an individual surgeons’ lower 95% confidence interval of their revision rate, measured in revision/100 component years(r/ocys), was above the NZ mean (0.71 r/ocys), that surgeon was required to audit their results with a nominated peer. This study investigates whether outlier surgeons also have high early (1 month and 1 year) revision rates.

In 2018, 236 surgeons performed 9,186 total hip arthroplasties in NZ. At the end of 2018, 11 surgeons received notification they were outliers. Results from all surgeons for years 2016, 2017 and 2018 were combined to form the first (pre-notification) time interval, and results from years 2019, 2020 and 2021 were combined to form the second time interval (post-notification). Outlier surgeons performed 2001 total hip replacements in the first time interval and 1947 hips in the second. Early revision rates (1 month and 1 year) of both outlier and nonoutlier surgeons for both time intervals were analysed.

Non-outlier surgeons had a consistent mean early revision rate of 0.75% at one month and 1.6% at one year for both time intervals. The 11 outlier surgeons had a higher earlier revision rate of 1.35% at one month and 2.45% at one year for the pre-notification time interval. These values reduced for the post-notification time interval to a revision rate of 1.23% for one month and 2.36% for one year.

Poor joint registry results of individual surgeons are often attributed to a poor choice of prosthesis. This study shows early revision rates of outlier surgeons, where prosthesis selection has minimal influence, are also high.

A slight improvement in early revision rates of outlier surgeons since introduction of the policy shows it is working.

The Oxford hip score (OHS) at 6 months and five years of less than 27 has previously been reported as having a 5.2% chance of requiring revision of their total hip arthroplasty (THA) within 2 years. We determined whether the OHS obtained at 10 years after surgery would be a suitable screening tool in lieu of clinic visits to detect patients requiring closer monitoring.

We reviewed data from the NZ Joint Registry between January 1999 and December 2016. OHS at 10 years was available for 5,165 non-revised THA patients. Patients were separated into four categories based on their OHS: 3,483 (67%) scored 42–48, 1,023 (20%) scored 34–41, 373 (7%) scored 27–33, and 286 (5%) scored 0–26.

For patients with a 6-month OHS, revision risk within 2 years was 1.3% in the 42–48 group, 2.5% in the 34–41 group, 4.6% in the 27–33 group, and 10.2 % in the 0–27 group. If only patients with a grading of 33 or less were offered clinical follow-up, 659/5165 patients (12.7%) would require evaluation and of these, 46/659 (7%) could be expected to require revision within two years. Of those patients with an OHS > 34 not evaluated, only a small number, 72/4506 (1.6%), might require a revision.

The OHS at 10 years of patients with a THA who have a grading less than 27 is a much stronger predictor of revision than OHS at 6 months or 5 years. Use of the 10 year OHS as a screening tool for THA requires evaluation of only one in eight patients, with the chance of missing 1 in 63 patients not followed up who might require a revision.

Total hip joint replacement (THJR) for high riding congenital hip dislocation (CDH) is often performed in young patients, and presents unique problems with acetabular cup placement and leg length inequality.

A database and the NZ Joint Registry were used to identify 76 hips in 57 patients with a diagnosis of CDH who underwent THJR in the Wellington region between 1994 and 2015. Records and radiographs of 46 hips in 36 patients classified pre-operatively as Crowe II, III or IV were reviewed. Surgical technique used a direct lateral approach, the uncemented acetabular component was located in the anatomic hip center and a primary femoral stem was used in all but one hip. Whether a step-cut sub-trochanteric femoral osteotomy was performed depended on degree of correction, tension on the sciatic nerve, and restoration of leg length.

For the 36 patients classified as Crowe II or higher, the average age at operation was 44 years (26 – 66), female:male ratio was 4.5:1 and follow-up averaged 10 years (2 – 22.3). Of the 15 hips classified as Crowe IV, 10 required a step-cut sub-trochanteric femoral osteotomy to shorten the femur, but 5 were lengthened without undo tension on the sciatic nerve. Nine Crowe IV hips received a conventional proximally coated tapered primary femoral component. Oxford hip scores for 76% of patients was excellent (> 41/48), and 24% had good scores (34 – 41). All femoral osteotomies healed. Five hips have been revised, one at 2 years for femoral loosening, one at 5 years for dislocation, two at 12 years for liner exchanges, and one at 21 years for femoral loosening.

THJR using primary prostheses for CDH can provide durable long-term results.