Materials and Methods

A simplified acetabular bone model was used for a series of insertion experiments. The bone model consisted of polyurethane solid foam blocks (Sawbones #1522-04 and #1522-05) into which a hemispherical cavity and cylindrical wall, representing the acetabular rim, were machined using a computer numerically controlled (CNC) milling machine (Haas Automation Inc., Oxnard, CA, USA). Fig. 1 depicts the bone model and setup used. A total of 10 insertions were carried out, 5 on a low density block, 5 on a high density block. The acetabular cups were press fitted into the bone models by succeeding hammer hits. The acceleration of the implant-insertor combination was measured using 2 shock accelerometers mounted on the insertor during the insertion process (PCB 350C03, PCB Depew, NY, USA). The force applied to the implant-insertor combination was also measured. 15 hammer hits were applied per insertion experiment. Two features were extracted from the acceleration time signal; total signal energy (E) and signal length (LS). Two features and one correlation measure were extracted from the acceleration frequency spectra; the relative signal power in the low frequency band (PL, from 500–2500Hz) and the signal power in the high frequency band (P Hf, from 4000–4800 Hz). The changes in the low frequency spectra (P Lf, from 500–2500 Hz) between two steps were tracked by calculating the Frequency Response Assurance Criterion (FRAC). Force features similar to the ones proposed by Mathieu et al., 2013 were obtained from the force time data. The convergence behavior of the features was tracked as insertion progressed.

Material and Methods

A Profemur Gladiator modular stem (MicroPort Orthopedics Inc. Arlington, TN, USA) and two artificial femora (composite bone 4th generation #3403, Sawbones Europe AB, Malmö, Sweden) were used. One artificial femur was instrumented with three rectangular strain gauge rosettes (Micro-Measurements, Raleigh, NC, USA). The rosettes were placed medially, posteriorly and anteriorly proximally on the cortical bone. Five paired implant insertions were repeated on both artificial bones, alternating between standard hammering and Woodpecker insertions. During the insertion processes the vibrational response was measured at the implant and Woodpecker side (fig. 1) using two shock accelerometers (PCB Piezotronics, Depew, NY, USA). Frequency spectra were derived from the vibrational responses. The endpoint of insertion was defined as the point when the static strain stopped increasing during the insertion.

Methods

A Profemur R modular revision stem (MicroPort Orthopedics Inc. Arlington, TN, United States of America) and artificial femora (composite bone 4th generation #3403, Sawbones Europe AB, Malmö, Sweden) prepared by a surgeon were used.

The micromotions were measured in proximal-distal, medial-lateral or anterior-posterior directions at four locations situated in two transverse planes, using pin and bushing combinations. At each measuring location an Ø8mm bushing was attached to the bone, and a concentric Ø3mm pin was attached to the implant [Fig.1 and 2]. A supporting structure used to hold either guiding bushings or linear variable displacement transducers (LVDT) is attached to the proximal part of the implant. The whole system was installed on a hydraulic force bench (PC160N, Schenck GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) and 250 physiological loading cycles were applied [Fig.3].

Materials and Methods

Acoustic measurements of the stem insertion hammer blows were taken intra-operatively during 7 cementless primary (Wright Profemur Primary) and 2 cementless revision surgeries (Wright Profemur R Revision). All surgeries were carried out by the same experienced surgeon. The sound was recorded using 6 microphones (PCB 130E2), mounted at a distance of approximately 1 meter from the surgical theater. The 7 primary implants were inserted without complication, 1 revision stem induced a fracture distally during the insertion process. Two surgeons were asked to listen independently to the acoustic sounds post-surgery and to label the hits in the signal they would associate with either a fully fixated implant or with a fracture sound. For 3 out of 7 primary measurements the data was labeled the same by the two surgeons, 4 were labeled differently or undecided and both indicated several hits that would be associated with fracture for the fractured revision case. The acquired time signals were processed using a number of time and frequency domain processing techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A biaxial test setup [Fig. 1] was developed to mechanically load the glenoidal assembly (base plate + glenosphere) of 5 Depuy^® Delta Xtend 38 prostheses. The setup allows applying a cyclic loading pattern to the glenoidal component with a constant actuator load of 750 N. Each of the 5 samples was tested for 5000 cycles on 3 defects: an interpositioning of 150 µm thick (0.48 mm³⁾ and two local underreaming defects, pushing one side of the glenosphere up 0.5 mm and 1 mm respectively, hence causing a misalignment. The relative movement was recorded using 4 Linear Variable Differential Transducers (LVDTs). The cycling frequency is 1 Hz.