The NZ Standards of Service Provision for Sarcoma patients were developed by the NZ Sarcoma working group and published by the Ministry of Health (MOH) in 2013. Although not formally enacted by the MOH we aimed to determine the impact of these published standards and referral pathways on disease-specific survival of patients with soft-tissue sarcoma in NZ. The Middlemore Musculoskeletal Tumour Unit database was searched. Patients referred for treatment in our centre with a diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma in the five-year period before (n=115) and after (n=155) were included. We excluded patients with bone sarcomas and retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas. The rate of referral after inappropriate treatment reduced after implementation of the Standards (24% vs 12%, p=0.010). The number of patients referred with tumours larger than 50mm decreased (74.8% vs 72.3%, p=0.021) and fewer had metastases at diagnosis (11.3% vs 3.2%, p=0.017). Mortality was lower in the group after introduction of the Standards (45% vs 30%, p=0.017). The estimated disease-specific survival curve between the two groups shows a trend towards increased survival in the post-standards group, although not reaching statistical significance. Local recurrence rate and metastasis rate after definitive treatment were similar between the two groups. Patients had a shorter duration of symptoms before referral in the post-Standards group although this was not statistically significant. Since implementation of the Standards, patients have been referred more promptly, with fewer inappropriate treatments. The time to mortality curve indicates a trend towards improved disease-specific survival. We conclude that the pathway for investigation and referral for this condition has become clearer, supporting the ongoing use of the Sarcoma Standards, and that these should be formally implemented by the MOH.
A number of studies suggest revision of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) to total knee replacement (TKR) is straightforward. We hypothesise that this is not always the case in terms of complexity, cost and clinical outcome. We identified 23 consecutive patients revised from UKR to TKR by 2 consultant surgeons (2005–2008). These were matched by age, sex and comorbidity to a cohort of primary TKRs (42 patients) performed during the same period. Data were collected regarding demographics, cost (surgical time & implants) and 1 & 5-year follow-up of clinical outcome (OKS) and outpatients attended. There was no statistically significant difference in cost of implants for revision UKR to TKR vs. primary TKR (p=0.08), however operative time was significantly higher in the revision group. One year mean OKS was significantly higher in the primary TKR group (mean 30 vs. 23 p=0.03), but 5-year follow up showed no significant difference (mean OKS 27 vs. 32 p=0.20). The revision group had statistically significantly greater number of follow-up appointments (mean 6 Vs. 2 p<0.0001). Revision of UKR to TKR is not a universally straightforward procedure, carrying significant overall cost implications. Clinical outcomes, although significantly different at 1 year are almost the same at 5 years.
Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an established treatment for single compartment end-stage knee arthrosis with good recorded survivorship. Although often used in more active, younger patients, patient selection remains controversial. To identify risk factors for early failure we compared patients with UKR failure requiring revision to total knee replacement (TKR) with a control group. Between September 2002 and 2008, 812 Oxford Mobile Bearing Medial UKRs were implanted. 21 implants (20 patients) required revision to TKR within 5 years. The leading cause for revision was lateral compartment disease progression (11 patients). In the revision group, 17 patients were female (81%), average age at index surgery was 64.1 (range 48–81) and average BMI 31.8 (range 24.4–41.5). Our UKR patients with early failure requiring revision were more likely to be female (p=0.0012) whilst age and BMI were similar between groups. Although the change in tibio-femoral valgus angle was similar, control group patients started in varus becoming valgus post-operatively, whereas revision group patients started in valgus and became more valgus post-operatively. This might explain lateral compartment disease progression as our leading cause of early failure. We believe females with medial compartment disease but valgus alignment are at greater risk of early failure and it is particularly important not to overstuff the medial compartment.
The Femoro Patella Vialli (FPV) is indicated for isolated patello-femoral joint replacement (PFJR). It is now the second most commonly used PFJR in the UK, however there are limited studies evaluating its outcome. Key differences include a larger component sulcus angle of 140 degrees which more closely mimics the normal knee. Between 2006 and 2012, we performed 53 consecutive FPV patellofemoral arthroplasties in 41 patients with isolated patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis. Mean age was 62.2years (39–86) and mean follow-up was 3.5 years. Mean Oxford Knee scores improved from 19.7 to 37.7 at latest follow-up. Ninety four percent of patients were happy or very happy with their knees. Progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis was seen 12% of knees. 2 knees required revision to TKR at 7 months post-operatively, which we attribute to poor patient selection. There were no cases of maltracking patella or patella dislocations at final follow-up, which we attribute to the larger sulcus angle. There were no cases of radiological loosening. Our findings suggest the FPV patellofemoral prosthesis has good mid-term functional outcomes.
A retrospective review of all patients transferred by helicopter ambulance to the Great Western Hospital over a 20-month period between January 2003 and September 2004 was undertaken to establish the case-mix of patients (trauma and non-trauma) transferred and the outcome of their admission and length of hospital stay. Details of all Helicopter Emergency Ambulance Service (HEAS) transfers to this unit in the study time period were obtained from the three HEAS providers in the area and case notes for all patients (where available) were reviewed.Background
Methods
To assess the efficacy and ease of use of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in soft tissue knee pathology. In a prospective study, we compared the OKS against the International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 (IKDC) and the Lysholm Scores (Lys). We also assessed the OKS with retrograde (Reversed OKS: 48=worst symptoms, 0=asymptomatic) and antegrade (as currently used in Oxford) numbering. All patients completed 3 questionnaires (OKS, Lys, and IKDC, or RevOKS, Lys, and IKDC) stating which was the simplest from their perspective. We recruited 93 patients from the orthopaedic and physiotherapy clinics. All patients between the ages of 15 and 45 with soft tissue knee derangements, such as ligamentous, and meniscal injuries were included. Exclusions were made in patients with degenerative and/or inflammatory arthritidis. Patients who had sustained bony injuries or underwent bony surgery were also excluded.Aim
Method
To devise a simple clinical risk classification system for patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (PTKR) to facilitate risk and cost estimation, and aid pre-operative planning. We retrospectively reviewed a series of consecutive PTKRs performed by the senior author. A classification system was devised to take account of principal risk factors in PTKR. Four groups were devised: 1) Non complex PTKR (CP0): no local or systemic complicating factors; 2) CPI: Locally complex: Severe or fixed deformity and/or bone loss, previous bony surgery or trauma, or ligamentous instability; 3) CPII Systemic complicating factors: Medical co-morbidity, steroid or immunosuppressant therapy, High BMI, (equivalent to ASA of III or more); 3) CPIII: Combination of local and systemic complicating factors (CPI+CPII). The patients were grouped accordingly and the following were compared: 1) length of stay, 2) post-operative complications, and 3) early post-discharge follow-up assessment. The complications were divided into local (wound problems, DVT, sepsis) and systemic (cardiopulmonary, metabolic, and systemic thromboembolic) complications.Aims
Methods
Referral to centres with a pelvic service is standard practice for the management of displaced acetabular fractures. The time to surgery: (1) is a predictor of radiological and functional outcome and (2) this varies with the fracture pattern.Background
Hypothesis
