National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines
state that cemented stems with an Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel
(ODEP) rating of >
3B should be used for hemiarthroplasty when treating
an intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. These recommendations
are based on studies in which most, if not all stems, did not hold
such a rating. This case-control study compared the outcome of hemiarthroplasty
using a cemented (Exeter) or uncemented (Corail) femoral stem. These
are the two prostheses most commonly used in hip arthroplasty in
the UK. Data were obtained from two centres; most patients had undergone
hemiarthroplasty using a cemented Exeter stem (n = 292/412). Patients
were matched for all factors that have been shown to influence mortality
after an intracapsular fracture of the neck of the femur. Outcome
measures included: complications, re-operations and mortality rates
at two, seven, 30 and 365 days post-operatively. Comparable outcomes
for the two stems were seen. There were more intra-operative complications in the uncemented
group (13% This study therefore supports the use of both cemented and uncemented
stems of proven design, with an ODEP rating of 10A, in patients
with an intracapsular fracture of the neck of the femur. Cite this article:
Current literature supports the use of total hip replacement (THR) for the treatment of displaced intra-capsular proximal femoral fractures (DIPFF). Case series of patients receiving this treatment show dislocation rates higher than that of patients who have THR to treat osteoarthritis. Large diameter THR have mechanical advantages in terms of dislocation and their role in PFF has yet to be assessed. To assess the role of large-diameter total hip replacements on the rate of dislocation when used to treat displaced intra-capsular proximal femoral fractures. Design: Single surgeon, case series Setting: Level I trauma centre Inclusion criteria: Displaced intra-capsular proximal femoral fracture (Garden III & IV). Independently mobile pre-operatively for distances greater than a mile, with no more than 1 stick as a mobility aid. Abbreviated mental test score of 9/10 or greater Exclusion criteria: Patient under 60 Pathological fractures Additional fractures of the femur Outcomes Mortality Morbidity (Including dislocation) Oxford Hip Score SF12 Patients/Participants: Retrospective study to assess patients who presented between May 2006 and December 2008 and met the requirements had a CPTÒ (Zimmer) cemented femoral stem, using 3rd generation cementation techniques, and large diameter Duronò (Zimmer) head and cup (uncemented) inserted as a primary procedure via a modified Hardinge technique. Follow up was via routine clinic appointments, letter to GP and phone conversation with patient.Introduction
Objectives
We studied prospectively a consecutive series of 50 patients with chronic osteomyelitis. Patients were allocated to the following treatment groups: 1) wide resection, with a clearance margin of 5 mm or more; 2) marginal resection, with a clearance margin of less than 5 mm; and 3) intralesional biopsy, with debulking of the infected area. All patients had a course of antibiotics, intravenously for six weeks followed by orally for a further six weeks. No patients in group 1 had recurrence. In patients treated by marginal resection (group 2), 8 of 29 (28%) had recurrence. All patients who had debulking had a recurrence within one year of surgery. We performed a survival analysis to determine the time of the recurrence of infection. In group 2 there was a higher rate of recurrence in type-B hosts (p <
0.05); no type-A hosts had recurrence. This information is of use in planning surgery for chronic osteomyelitis.
