Acetabular component orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA)
influences results. Intra-operatively, the natural arthritic acetabulum
is often used as a reference to position the acetabular component.
Detailed information regarding its orientation is therefore essential. The
aim of this study was to identify the acetabular inclination and
anteversion in arthritic hips. Acetabular inclination and anteversion in 65 symptomatic arthritic
hips requiring THA were measured using a computer navigation system.
All patients were Caucasian with primary osteoarthritis (29 men,
36 women). The mean age was 68 years (SD 8). Mean inclination was
50.5° (SD 7.8) in men and 52.1° (SD 6.7) in women. Mean anteversion
was 8.3° (SD 8.7) in men and 14.4° (SD 11.6) in women. Objectives
Methods
The routine use of a fixed distal femoral resection angle in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) assumes little or no variation in the angle between the anatomical and mechanical femoral axes (FMA angle) in different patients. The aims of this study were threefold, firstly to investigate the distribution of FMA angle in TKA patients, secondly to identify any correlation between the FMA angle and the pre-operative coronal mechanical femoro-tibial (MFT) angle and in addition to assess post-operative MFT angle with fixed or variable distal femoral resection angles. 277 primary TKAs were performed using either fixed or variable distal femoral resection angles (174 and 103 TKAs respectively), with intramedullary femoral and extramedullary tibial jigs. The variable distal femoral resection angles were equal to the FMA angle measured on pre-operative Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) digital radiographs for each patient. Outcomes were assessed by measuring the FMA angle and the pre- and post-operative MFT angles on HKA radiographs. The FMA angle ranged from 2° to 9° (mean 5.9°). Both cohorts showed a correlation between FMA and pre-operative MFT angles (fixed: r = -0.499, variable: r = -0.346) with valgus knees having lower FMA angles. Post-operative coronal alignment within ±5° increased from 86% in the fixed angle group to 96% when using a variable angle, p = 0.025. For post-operative limb alignment within ±3°, accuracy improved from 67% (fixed) to 85% (variable), p = 0.002. These results show that the use of a fixed distal femoral resection angle is a source of error regarding post-operative coronal limb malalignment. The correlation between the FMA angle and pre-operative varus-valgus alignment supports the rational of recommending the adjustment of the resection angle according to the pre-operative deformity (3°-5° for valgus, 6°-8° for varus) in cases where HKA radiographs are not available for pre-operative planning.
