Fractures of the navicular can occur in isolation but, owing
to the intimate anatomical and biomechanical relationships, are
often associated with other injuries to the neighbouring bones and
joints in the foot. As a result, they can lead to long-term morbidity
and poor function. Our aim in this study was to identify patterns
of injury in a new classification system of traumatic fractures
of the navicular, with consideration being given to the commonly associated
injuries to the midfoot. We undertook a retrospective review of 285 consecutive patients
presenting over an eight- year period with a fracture of the navicular.
Five common patterns of injury were identified and classified according
to the radiological features. Type 1 fractures are dorsal avulsion
injuries related to the capsule of the talonavicular joint. Type
2 fractures are isolated avulsion injuries to the tuberosity of
the navicular. Type 3 fractures are a variant of tarsometatarsal
fracture/dislocations creating instability of the medial ray. Type
4 fractures involve the body of the navicular with no associated
injury to the lateral column and type 5 fractures occur in conjunction
with disruption of the midtarsal joint with crushing of the medial
or lateral, or both, columns of the foot.Aims
Patients and Methods
The purpose of this study was to compare symptomatic treatment
of a fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal with immobilisation
in a cast. Our null hypothesis was that immobilisation gave better patient
reported outcome measures (PROMs). The alternative hypothesis was
that symptomatic treatment was not inferior. A total of 60 patients were randomised to receive four weeks
of treatment, 36 in a double elasticated bandage (symptomatic treatment
group) and 24 in a below-knee walking cast (immobilisation group).
The primary outcome measure used was the validated Visual Analogue
Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) Score. Data were analysed by a clinician,
blinded to the form of treatment, at presentation and at four weeks,
three months and six months after injury. Loss to follow-up was
43% at six months. Multiple imputations missing data analysis was performed.Aims
Patients and Methods
The study evaluated and compared the three-dimensional (3-D) changes in geometry of the first metatarsal following scarf osteotomy. All osteotomies were performed on standardised Sawbone® models by consultant orthopaedic surgeons with a sub-specialist interest in foot and ankle surgery. The study considered the inter-surgeon variances in interpretation and performance of the scarf osteotomy with respect to intra-surgeon variances. The analysis used an accurate digitising system to measure and record points on the Sawbone® models in 3-D space. Computer software performed vector analysis to calculate 3-D rotations and translations of the first metatarsal head as well as the inter-metatarsal angle. Bone cut lengths and displacements were measured using a digital Vernier caliper. One surgeon performed the osteotomy ten times to form an intra-surgeon control dataset, while ten different surgeons each did one scarf osteotomy to form an inter-surgeon test dataset. Both surgical groups produced reductions in the 3-D inter-metatarsal angle with non-significant differences between the groups (p>
0.05). In contrast, the test group demonstrated highly significant (p=0.000) greater variance compared with the control dataset for all of the variables (bone cut length, proximal and distal metatarsal displacements plus angulation of the distal fragment) associated with surgical technique. In addition, there were highly significant (p=0.02 and p=0.002) greater variances in the interpretation of the degree to which the metatarsal head should be translated medially (X) and inferiorly (Z). There was also a significant (p=0.001) increase in variances in the rotations about the dorsi/plantarflexion (X) axis. The only significant differences (all p=0.000) attributable solely to differences in mean values were in proximal-distal (Y) translation, pronation (Y) rotation and medial (Z) rotation. The test group applied greater medial and plantarflexion rotation of the metatarsal head than the control surgeon and significantly less (p=0.000) shortening of the first metatarsal than the control surgeon. The results of this geometric study demonstrate the versatility of the scarf osteotomy. In addition, it indicated notable out-of-plane metatarsal head rotations and translations effected by the scarf osteotomy. As a result of the multi-planar nature of the osteotomy, there is a potential risk of producing unintended rotational mal-unions in all three planes. These rotational mal-unions may account for some of the poorer outcomes documented within the literature.
