Conferences centered around surgery suffers from gender disparity with male faculty having a more dominant presence in meetings compared to female faculty. Orthopedic Surgery possibly suffers the most from this problem of all surgical specialties, and is reflective of a gender disparity in the field. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of “manels”, or male-only sessions, in eight major Orthopedic Surgery meetings hosted in 2021 and to quantify the differences in location of practice, academic position, years of practice, and research qualifications between male and female faculty.

Eight Orthopedic conferences organized by major Orthopedic associations (AAOS, COA, OTA, EFORT, AAHKS, ORS, NASS, and AOSSM) from February 2021 to November 2021 were analyzed. Meeting information was retrieved from the conference agendas, and details of chairs and speakers were obtained from Linkedin, Doximity, CPSO, personal websites, and Web of Science. Primary outcomes included: one) percentage of male faculty in all included sessions and two) overall percentage of manels. Secondary outcomes included one) percentage of male speakers and chairs in all included sessions, two) overall percentage of male-chair and male-speaker only sessions. Comparisons for outcomes were made between conferences and session topics (adult reconstruction hip, adult reconstruction knee, practice management/rehabilitation, trauma, sports, general, pediatrics, upper extremity, musculoskeletal oncology, foot and ankle, spine, and miscellaneous). Mean number of sessions for male and female were compared after being stratified into quartiles based on publications, sum of times cited, and H-indexes. Data was analyzed with non-parametric analysis, chi-square tests, or independent samples t-tests using SPSS version 28.0.0.0 with a p-value of < 0 .05 being considered statistically significant.

Of 193 included sessions, 121 (62.3%) were manels and the mean percentage of included faculty that was male was 88.9% Apart from the topics of practice management/rehabilitation and musculoskeletal oncology, male representation was very high. Additionally, most included conferences had an extremely high percentage of male representation apart from meetings hosted by the COA and ORS. Non-manel sessions had a greater mean number of chairs (p=0.006), speakers (p < 0 .001), and faculty (p < 0 .001) than manel sessions. Of 1080 total included faculty members, 960 (88.9%) were male. Male faculty were more likely to be Orthopedic surgeons than female faculty (p < 0 .001) while also more likely to hold academic rank as a professor. Mean number of sessions between male and female faculty within their respective quartiles of H-indexes, sum of times cited, and number of publications did not reach statistical significance. Mean years of practice between male and female faculty was also not significantly different.

There is a high prevalence of manels and an overall lack of female representation in Orthopedic meetings. Orthopedic associations should aim to make efforts to increase gender equity in future meetings.

Tibial shaft fractures have a high incidence of delayed and non-union, often requiring multiple procedures. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation is a safe and effective treatment for tibial non union but little is known about the efficacy of PEMF in preventing non-union in acute fractures.

Between August 2005 and December 2008, eligible patients presenting at six major metropolitan hospitals with acute tibial shaft fractures (AO classification 4-2) were included. Participants were randomised by an independent allocation centre to identical active or inactive PEMF devices, both prescribed to be worn ten hours daily for twelve weeks. Baseline data were collected, and patients and surgeons were surveyed serially via post and/or phone at three, six and twelve months. Participants, data collectors and data analysts were blinded. The main outcome was any surgical intervention for delayed/non union.

Data from 150 patients (76 active and 74 inactive) were available for analysis (12 month follow up 78%). There was no between-group difference in age, gender, mechanism of injury, open grade, smoking status, or compliance with the device (hours of use). Overall compliance was moderate (5.7 hours daily use). Fifteen of 76 (20%) of active device patients required surgery for delayed/non-union vs. 8 of 74 (11%) in the placebo group; odds ratio of surgery=2.03, p=0.13, 95% CI 0.80 to 5.12. An intention to treat analysis adjusted for open grade and hours the device was used showed an odds ratio of requiring surgery of 1.78 (p=0.24, 95% CI 0.68 to 4.64). A sub-group analysis of 80 compliant patients (defined a priori as a minimum average of six hours daily use) was performed. Nine of 35 (26%) patients with an active device required surgery for delayed/non-union vs. 3 of 45 (7%) in the placebo group; odds ratio of surgery=7.60 (p=0.017, 95% CI 1.43 to 40.24).

Based on these unexpected initial results, PEMF stimulation does not prevent revision surgery for delayed/non-union in acute fractures of the tibial shaft.