Aim: To assess medium term results of MOJE arthroplasty for degenerative Hallux Rigidus.

Materials and Methods: Patients over 18 years of age with symptomatic degenerative hallux rigidus, with at least three years follow up were included in the study. Patients who had previous surgery for hallux rigidus were excluded. A press fit Moje ceramic on ceramic prosthesis was implanted using the standard technique. Patients were non-weight bearing for the initial two weeks followed by physiotherapy according to the Moje protocol. All patients were assessed radiologically and clinically using the AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) and Foot Function Index (FFI – R, short form) as the primary outcome measure and a Visual Analogue Pain score (VAS) as the secondary outcome measure. Radiological assessment was carried out independently by two authors. Prosthesis loosening was defined as more than 5mm subsidence (sum of proximal and distal components), implant tilting and presence of osteolytic lesions. Revision of arthroplasty was taken as an end point to define failure.

Results: 27 Moje replacements of the first metatarso-phalangeal joint in 25 patients operated by one surgeon were included in the study. There were 22 female and 3 male patients with a mean age of 61 (range: 48–83). Mean preoperative range of movement (sum of dorsi and plantar flexion) was 310 (range: 10–65). Mean preoperative FFI – R score was 100 (range: 53–183); mean preoperative AOFAS score was 45 (range: 28–64); mean preoperative VAS was 8 (range: 3–10). The average follow up was 49 months (range: 36–60). There were no wound complications. Postoperatively, 5 joints (19%) required closed manipulation and 3 joints (11%) required open arthrolysis to improve the range of movement. Three joints (11%) drifted into valgus, two of them requiring a corrective Akin osteotomy of the proximal phalanx. One patient (4%) required open reduction for dislocation and one patient required excision of the medial sesamoid for persistent pain. In all, 12 replacements (44%) were symptomatic enough to require a further procedure. None of the joints required revision. The mean postoperative range of movement was 350 (range: 15–60, p=0.85, Relative Risk=1.069, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.72–1.59). There was improvement in postoperative FFI–R score (mean: 41, Range: 27–66, p=0.007, RR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.34–0.83), AOFAS score (mean: 83, range: 68–100, p=0.07, RR: 1.5, 95% CI: 0.98–2.38) and VAS (mean: 1, range: 0–5, p=0.04, RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.0.66–0.97). Radiologically, there were signs of loosening of prosthesis in 4 joints (15%) without an adverse outcome in pain and functional scores.

Discussion: There is a high incidence of stiffness requiring further surgical procedure to improve the range of movement following this replacement. Although pain and function scores improve with Moje arthroplasty, patients should be counselled that their range of movement may not improve and annual long-term clinical and radiological surveillance would be necessary to assess the integrity of this prosthesis. Further studies including larger number of patients with longer follow up are required to assess the long-term results of this procedure.

Hip and knee arthroplasty has been associated with relatively high rates of thromboembolic events and the majority of UK orthopaedic surgeons use at least one form of prophylaxis. Of the many different subgroups of thromboembolic rates that are commonly presented in the literature, symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis (spDVT) and fatal pulmonary embolism (fPE) are perhaps the most important clinical outcomes.

To determine the effectiveness of common chemical and mechanical prophylactic methods in preventing spDVT and fPE in patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasty. A systematic review of the literature from 1981 to December 2002 was performed. Predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Studies where more than one method of prophylaxis was used were excluded from analysis. For each individual method of prophylaxis, data was extracted, combined and converted to give estimates of the rates of spDVT, fPE and major bleeding events. Absolute risk reduction estimates for spDVT, fPE and major bleeding events were calculated by comparing the thromboembolic rates for each method of prophylaxis with using no prophylaxis of any kind.

992 studies were identified of which 162 met the inclusion criteria. No method of prophylaxis was statistically significantly more effective at preventing spDVT and fPE than using nothing. There were at least as many major bleeding complications as spDVTs. The number of fPEs prevented was very small.

When complications such as major bleeding are considered, the evidence behind the use of any prophylaxis is unconvincing.

Aim: Intracapsular hip fractures in young adults have a significant risk of fracture healing complications. Consequently, some authors advocate urgent and/or open fracture reduction. Our aim was to analyse outcomes following such fractures with reference to influence of fracture displacement, timing of surgery and method of reduction (open/closed) on the incidence of non-union (NU) and avascular necrosis (AVN).

Methods: Specific search terms were used to retrieve relevant published studies from 1966 to May 2003.

Results: Eighteen studies involving 564 fractures were analysed. The overall incidence of NU was 50/564 (8.9%) and AVN was 130/564 (23.0%). There was a higher incidence of NU and AVN following displaced than undisplaced fractures. NU occurred more frequently after open reduction than closed reduction (10/89 [11.2%] versus 13/275 [4.7%])

There was an increased incidence of AVN after closed than open reduction but this became not statistically significant when one study with a markedly higher reported incidence of AVN was excluded.

The difference in the incidence of NU and AVN following early (< 12 hours) or late (> 12 hours) surgery was not significant for either NU or AVN.

Conclusion: Early or open reduction of these fractures may not reduce the risk of NU or AVN. There is a suggestion of a higher incidence of NU following open reduction than closed reduction. Randomised studies with two year follow-up are required to report on a larger number of patients before definite conclusions on treatment can be made.

Aims: The re-dislocation rates in adults (< 30 years) in the initial 12 months after FAT (first,anterior,traumatic) shoulder dislocations treated non-operatively vary from 25% to 95%. Some surgeons advocate early arthroscopic surgery following such dislocations as this appears to reduce recurrent instability. The purpose of this study was to establish if arthroscopic surgery reduces the incidence of recurrent instability after such dislocations when compared to non-operative treatment.

Material and Methods: Specific search terms were used to retrieve relevant studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL extending from 1966 to October 2003. Guidelines for reporting of meta-analysis, adapted from QUOROM statement were followed. Adults under 30 years of age, with clinical and radiological confirmation of anterior dislocation following trauma with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included. Patients with previous shoulder problems, generalised joint laxity, neurological injury, impingement and a history of substance abuse were excluded.

Results: 13 studies involving 433 shoulders were reviewed.

Group A included 84 shoulders treated by arthroscopic lavage without stabilisation. There were no subluxations. The re-dislocation rate was 14.3% (12/84).

Group B had 179 shoulders treated by arthroscopic stabilisation. The incidence of subluxation was 5.02% (9/179) and dislocation was 6.14% (11/179).

Recurrent instability (subluxation /dislocation) following arthroscopic lavage (12/84 – 14.3%) was significantly higher than after arthroscopic stabilisation (20/179 – 11.2%). [p= 0.04, Relative risk = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.07 to 5.05]

Group C involved 170 shoulders treated non-operatively. The incidence of subluxation was 8% (12/150) and dislocation was 62% (93/150). The overall incidence of recurrent instability was 70% (119/170).

Recurrent instability following arthroscopic intervention (32/263 – 12.2%) was significantly lower than following non-operative treatment (119/170 – 70%) [p< 0.0001, Relative risk = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.24].

Conclusion: Early arthroscopic surgery reduces recurrent instability during the initial 12 months after FAT shoulder dislocation in young adults (< 30 years) when compared to non-operative treatment. Arthroscopic treatment should be offered to young, athletic patients especially those involved in contact sports or defence personnel, who are at a high risk of recurrent instability after initial shoulder dislocation. Further randomised control trials reporting on a larger number of patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years are required before one can draw firm conclusions on the ability of arthroscopic intervention to influence the natural history of FAT shoulder dislocation.

Aim: Compressive forces on the medial femoral cortex and tensile forces at the lateral femoral cortex along with cortical comminution lead to a high risk of failure of surgical fixation of subtrochanteric fractures. The purpose of the study was to correlate the incidence of fracture healing complications to the surgical stabilisation method used.

Methods: A comprehensive search of various data sources extending from 1966 to October 2003 was conducted to identify appropriate studies using specific search terms. We also scanned the reference lists of eligible studies for potentially relevant reports. Articles of all languages were considered. Studies with a follow-up of less than six months, pathological fractures, fractures treated non-operatively and studies reporting on less than ten fractures were excluded. Abstracts were also excluded. Each eligible study was independently reviewed by authors for methodological quality. A methodological scoring system adapted from that of Detsky was used. Guidelines for reporting of meta-analysis, adapted from QUOROM statement were followed.

Results: 39 studies including 1835 fractures were analysed. For extramedullary devices, the incidence of non-union (35/673 – 5.2%), delayed union (11/221 – 4.7%), implant breakage ( 24/444 – 5.1%) and deep infection (14/459 – 3.0%) was statistically significantly higher than non-union (14/506 – 2.7%), delayed union (5/529 – 0.94%), implant breakage (12/628 –1.9%) and deep infection (9/764 – 1.2%) for intramedullary devices. Mortality and superficial infection were higher for extramedullary than intramedullary devices. However, this was not statistically significant. Malunion, shortening and implant cut out were higher for intramedullary than extramedullary devices. This was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: The incidence of fracture healing complications appear to be significantly less with intramedullary than extramedullary devices. Based on this study, we advocate the use of intramedullary surgical fixation devices for subtrochanteric fractures.

Background: Intracapsular hip fractures in young adults under 50 years of age have a significant risk of fracture healing complications which has led some authors to advocate urgent fracture reduction and/or open reduction. As these fractures are infrequent, limited information is available from published studies to advocate a particular method of treatment to reduce the risk of complications. The purpose of this study is to analyze outcomes following such fractures with particular reference to the influence of the degree of fracture displacement, timing of surgery, method of reduction (open/closed) on the incidence of non-union and avascular necrosis.

Methods: Specific search terms were used to retrieve relevant studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL extending from 1966 to May 2003. Guidelines for reporting of meta-analysis, adapted from QUOROM statement were followed.

Results: Eighteen studies with 564 fractures were identified for analysis. The overall incidence of non-union was 50/564 (8.9%) and avascular necrosis (AVN) was 130/564 (23.0%). There was a higher incidence of non-union and AVN following displaced than undisplaced fractures. Non-union occurred more frequently after open reduction than closed reduction (10/89 [11.2%] versus 13/275 [4.7%], P=0.04, RR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.93).

There was an increased incidence of AVN after closed than open reduction (P= 0.0005, RR = 2.77, 95% CI: 1.45 to 5.29) but this became not statistically significant when one study with a markedly higher reported incidence of AVN was excluded (P = 0.07, RR= 1.85, 95% CI: 0.93 to 3.68).

The difference in the incidence of non-union and AVN following early (< 12 hours) or late (> 12 hours) surgery was not significant for either non-union or AVN (13/110 [11.8%] versus 3/60 [5.0%], p=0.18, RR2.36, CI 0.70 to 7.97 for non-union, 15/110 [13.6%] versus 9/60 [15.0%], p=0.82, RR=0.91, CI 0.42 to 1.95 for AVN).

Conclusion: Early (< 12 hours) or open reduction of these fractures may not reduce the risk of non-union or avascular necrosis. There is a suggestion of a higher incidence of non-union following open reduction than closed reduction. Randomized studies or prospective observational studies with a minimum follow-up of two years are required to report on a larger number of patients in this age group before definite conclusions on treatment can be made.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the various subtrochanteric fracture classification systems particularly in relation to their predictive value for choice of treatment and outcome.

Methods: A comprehensive search of various data sources extending from 1966 to October 2003 was conducted to identify appropriate studies using specific search terms. Articles of all languages were considered. From these articles and those referenced within them, the use of, and any description of fracture classifications were recorded. Abstracts and studies reporting on less than ten fractures were excluded. A methodological scoring system adapted from that of Detsky was used to assess the quality of studies. For each classification system, features such as proximal and distal margin of subtrochanteric fractures, number of subdivisions, advice for fractures which cross the described anatomical boundaries, number of publications using that classification system, published articles showing value in predicting outcome and published articles showing inter-observer variation were analysed.

Results: 110 studies involving 2725 fractures were identified. 16 different classification methods were analysed. The actual length of femur defined as the subtrochanteric zone varied from 3 cms to12 cms. There was no agreement between the different classifications regarding the proximal and distal borders, or for classifying fractures that traverse anatomical boundaries. None of the classifications systems was shown to be of value in determining treatment or for predicting outcome.

Conclusion: There is a need for a universally accepted definition for subtrochanteric fractures and sub-classifying such fractures is questionable. Indicators to a simple yet valid classification system which takes into account the variations of this fracture and which would assist in determination of treatment and prediction of outcome are proposed.

Aim: The re-dislocation rates in adults (< 30 years) in the initial 12 months after first, anterior, traumatic (FAT) shoulder dislocations treated non-operatively vary from 25% to 95%. The purpose of this study was to establish if arthroscopic surgery reduces the incidence of recurrent instability (failure) after such dislocations when compared to non-operative treatment.

Material and Methods: Specific search terms were used to retrieve relevant studies from various databases extending from 1966 to May 2004. Guidelines for reporting of meta-analysis, adapted from QUOROM statement were followed.

Results: 13 studies involving 433 shoulders were reviewed. Group A included 84 shoulders treated by arthroscopic lavage without stabilisation. There were no subluxations. The re-dislocation rate was 14.3% (12/84). Group B had 179 shoulders treated by arthroscopic stabilisation. The incidence of subluxation was 5.02% (9/179) and dislocation was 6.14% (11/179). Failure following arthroscopic lavage (12/84 – 14.3%) was significantly higher than after arthroscopic stabilisation (20/179 – 11.2%). [p= 0.04, Relative risk = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.07 to 5.05]. Group C involved 170 shoulders treated non-operatively. The incidence of subluxation was 8% (12/150) and dislocation was 62% (93/150). The overall incidence of failure was 70% (119/170). Failure following arthroscopic intervention (32/263 – 12.2%) was significantly lower than following non-operative treatment (119/170 – 70%) [p< 0.0001, Relative risk = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.24].

Conclusion: Early arthroscopic surgery appears to reduce recurrent instability during the initial 12 months after FAT shoulder dislocation in young adults (< 30 years) when compared to non-operative treatment. Arthroscopic stabilisation may be considered for young, athletic patients and those involved in contact sports or defence personnel, who are at a high risk of recurrent instability after FAT shoulder dislocation. RCTs reporting on a larger number of patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years are required before one can draw firm conclusions on the ability of arthroscopic intervention to influence the natural history of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation.